The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 

More Clearly Understood. 

B O O K O N E 

The Introduction 

With Supporting Documents, Details, and Historical Facts, 

Derived From Mostly Jewish Sources, 

Or Sources favorable to Jewish Views, 

And Judicious and Rather Timely Commentary by 

The Compiler & Editor of This Book, 

Ronald J. Gardner 

Copyright June 28, 1996, May, 2009 

by Ronald J. Gardner 

http://gardner.christogena.org 

info@gardner.christogenea.org 

All Rights Reserved, 

For the Annotated Text, Commentary, etc., except as such 

Copyright(s) as may be held by Sources relied upon.* 

There is no “Copyright” Registration 

That is Known to Exist at This Time 

For the Protocol’s “Original Text,” 

commonly labeled as “The Protocols of Zion,” or 

“The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” 

“The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion,” etc. 

* All “Copyright” for cited or quoted Books, Articles, Printed Materials, etc., reside with those 

Authors or those holding such Copyright, and are presented here freely and within the parameters 

of the Copyright Act of 1976, Title 17, U.S.C., § 107, regarding “fair use,” which allows limited use 

of copyrighted material to reproduce, report, teach, or criticize, or for scholarship or review, and 

offered non-profit, without requiring permission from the Copyright holders, with Attribution of the 

Author(s) and Source(s) plainly mentioned. 

Permission is granted to the Reader and User hereof to quote portions of this Book within the limits 

of the above described doctrine of “fair use,” provided that when so done there is accurate quotation, 

reference, and citation accompanying that usage, to permit the Reader thereof to know of and find 

that source. 

This Introductory Work of The Protocols may be cited as: 

“Gardner, Ronald J., The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, More Clearly Understood, Book 

One, Introduction, Part __, § __, p.__, at n.__”. 

The Reader should consult the Introduction of This Book, in The Compiler & Editor’s Preface, 

at § A Cautionary Note Regarding Emphasis In The Text, regarding the “emphasis” placed upon

BOOK ONE — INTRODUCTION 

certain words and phrases, and the elypsis (or, “...”), and Paragraph Numbering, as will be found 

in this Annotation of the “Original Text.” 

THE COMPILER & EDITOR’S PREFACE 

After observing the title of this book, and its commentary, some ill-informed or prejudiced 

people will accuse The Compiler & Editor and/or his Work(s) as being “anti-Semitic.” If by that 

term these Accusers mean that The Compiler & Editor is opposed to the Jews as a race or as a 

people, The Accused denies the allegation. But if the Accuser means that the Accused is 

opposed to a coterie, or intimate and often exclusive group, of inter-nation-al Jewish 

revolutionaries, political “activists,” financiers, bankers, and other types of subversive operatives 

and groups which are intent on — if not by that time, already — ruling the world, whether ruling 

over Gentile or non-Jewish peoples and properties and circumstances, worked by applying the 

power of subtly, aggressive suggestion, threat, violence, gold and/or by every other means 

available to that Jew; or if the Accusers mean that The Compiler & Editor is opposed to an internation-al 

Jewish form of “Commune-ism,” then The Compiler & Editor of This Book pleads 

guilty to the accusation; for to do otherwise would be to deceive the other honest people in the 

world: Jews, non-Jews, the true Israelites, and the Gentiles, all alike as to the matter of this 

Truth. 

R.J. Gardner, as 

The Compiler and Editor of this Book 

[ ========================= ] 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

BOOK ONE. — INTRODUCTION 

THE COMPILER & EDITOR’S PREFACE 

QUALIFYING STATEMENTS REGARDING THIS WORK: 

A WORD ABOUT THE “SOURCES” RELIED UPON 

A CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EMPHASIS IN THE TEXT 

REFERENCE WORKS FOR SPECIFIC WORD DEFINITIONS 

EDITIONS OF THE PROTOCOLS RELIED UPON 

ENGLISH LANGUAGE SOURCES 

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -2

“ZION, ZIONISM,” DEFINED 


JEWISH RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR SOURCES 

S E C T I O N O N E 

Part 1. HELPFUL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE READER 

Part 2. CONCERNING VICTOR MARSDEN 

The Translator of The Present Document, The Protocols of The Learned 

Elders of Zion, After He Translated Such Document From the Russian 

into the English Language 

Part 3. CONCERNING SERGYEI NILUS 

The Translator of the original Protocols From the Russian language into 

English 

Part 4. EXCERPTS FROM NILUS’ PROTOCOLS, FROM VARIOUS CITED 

SOURCES 

Part 5. CONCERNING THE PROTOCOLS DOCUMENT, WHICH “FIT THE 

SITUATION.” 

Part 6. THE WORD “PROTOCOL,” DEFINED 

Part 7. THE PROTOCOLS IN HISTORY AS WRITTEN BY THE JEWS 

Part 8. THE PROTOCOLS IN PRE-SOVIET RUSSIA 

Part 9. CLAIMS OF “FORGERY” DISPROVED — AND, DISMISSED 

Part 10. ALLEGED “PROOF” OF FORGERY 

Part 11. SOME OTHERS INVOLVED WHO ARE SUGGESTED AS PROMOTING 

“ANTI-SEMITISM” 

Part 12. FORGERY, DEFINED BY “LAW.” 

Part 13. WILLFUL MISLEADING OF THE UNKNOWING “GENTILES” 

Part 14. THE “PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS.” 

Part 15. THE TERM “THE (LEARNED) ELDERS” DEFINED 

Part 16. WHO ARE “THE ELDERS”? 

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -3-


Part 17. WHO WROTE THE PROTOCOLS? 

Part 18. ENCYCLOPEDIA JUDAICA’s HISTORY OF THE PROTOCOLS 

Part 19. SOME BRIEF DEFINITIONS OF WORDS USED BY THE “JEWISH” 

AUTHOR OF THE PROTOCOLS 

Part 20. THE “SYMBOLIC SNAKE” OF JUDAISM 

Part 21. BIBLE-BASED SOURCES REGARDING THE “SYMBOLIC SNAKE” 

Part 22. SOME JEWISH ANSWERS TO A “JEWISH WORLD CONSPIRACY” 

Part 23. THE “OPINIONS” OF RUSSIA’s CZAR NICHOLAS ABOUT THE 

PROTOCOLS, ACCORDING TO JEWISH SOURCES 

Part 24. THE “PRINCE” SYSTEM OF JUDAISM OR ZIONISM 

Part 25. THE PROTOCOLS IN ARAB LANDS, ACCORDING TO JEWISH SOURCES 

Part 26. AN APPROXIMATE CHRONOLOGY OF APPEARANCES OF THE 

PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION 

Part 27. A REVIEW OF SAN DIEGO NEWSPAPER ARTICLES MAKING 

REFERENCE TO “THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION” 

S E C T I O N T W O 

Part 1. A BRIEF, RELEVANT BIOGRAPHY OF HENRY FORD AS IT RELATES TO 

THE INTERNATIONAL JEW “APOLOGY”-INCIDENT 

Part 2. A BRIEF, RELEVANT BIOGRAPHY OF GERALD L.K. SMITH 

Part 3. Prefaces to the Four Volume Book Editions of Henry Ford’s Publication of The 

International Jew 

Part 4. A Listing of the Chapters As They are Titled in Ford’s Four Volume Book Set, 

The International Jew 

S E C T I O N T H R E E 

Part 1. IMMIGRANT JEWS IN THE ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRATION. 



Part 2. THE ROOSEVELT “NEW DEAL” AND ITS DEALER-AUTHORS. 

S E C T I O N F O U R 

Part 1. JUDAISM AS AN INFLICTED MENTAL ILLNESS. 

Part 2. COMMENTARY UPON “THE TRADITIONS OF THE ELDERS,” MORE 

CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD 

Part 3 HOW “St. PAUL” — BEING A JEW, OR AT LEAST A JEWISH TOOL — 

DECEIVED ANCIENT CHRISTIANITY. 

Part 4. DON JUAN, A PORTION OF THE POEM BY, LORD BYRON, CANTO 12, V 

AND VI; WHEREIN THE JEWS ARE MENTIONED. 

A B I B L I O G R A P H Y 

BOOK TWO — THE ANNOTATED TEXT. 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, More Clearly Understood, 

With Annotations, Comments, etc. 



QUALIFYING STATEMENTS REGARDING THIS WORK 

A WORD ABOUT EDITORIAL COMMENTARY 

There has been an attempt, not always successful, by The Compiler and Editor of This 

Book to say as little as possible where opinion is concerned; what few comments of his there 

may be are marked thusly: “(Ed.).” When the document speaks well enough for itself, there is 

little need to add more to it. 

However, when needed — and it was needed at all times during the preparation of This 

Book, it will be upon Jewish sources, Jewish authors, and Jewish details that 90% of the 

resources listed or found in this book to discuss The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion will 

depend. 

A WORD ABOUT THE “SOURCES” RELIED UPON 

The Jewish sources, et al., offered into The Reader’s court of conscience as “evidence, 

have been used to overcome any taint of so-called “anti-Semitism” thrown at either This Book or 

its Compiler & Editor. How can The Adversary of all Christianity, Catholicism, Islam, 

Buddhism, etc., condemn such a document when their own Works have been relied upon for 

verifying the facts, opinions, and historical details herein. 

When citing the several Sources, there has been the unusual inclusion in the citation of 

that Source’s “chapter,” if any, since oft-times a chapter-title will, in the fewest words, provide 

The Reader with insight greater than the words quoted from that book’s chapter. 

EDITIONS OF THE PROTOCOLS RELIED UPON 

Only two editions of The Protocols available to the Editor: The Protocols of the Learned 

Elders of Zion, an undated, probably pre-A.D.1965 Christian Nationalist Crusade pamphletedition 

(which does not have Protocol “ 7.6”), and, The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, 

Milton William Cooper’s paperback book edition in his book Behold A Pale Horse (Light 

Technology Pub. Sedona, Ariz., 1991), Chp. 15, (which does have Protocol 7.6). 

The Nationalist Christian Crusade version does not cite an original source, but provides 

historical background, much of which was adopted into this Introduction. Portions of the text 

found in The Introduction to This Book are derived from an edition of The Protocols as 

published by the Christian nationalist Crusade, one of the few — though now apparently 

defunct — publishers of The Protocols. Cooper’s book at large appears fraught with irrelevant 

oddities in its other chapters, which reduces the believability of the more truthful matters he 

presents therein, and it does not cite the source of The Protocols relied upon in that book. If there 

are any errors in the “Introduction,” or in the text of any part of The Protocols, The Compiler & 

Editor will be quick to blame these two now demised Sources — it is easy to kick the dead. 



Henry Ford had publicly asked that his name not be associated with his publications in 

either news articles in his personally published newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, and/or his 

four-volume compilation of those newspaper articles into The International Jew, nonetheless 

references to Ford’s publications — which are now exceeding any “copyright” laws and thus 

placed in the public access and use — are commonly made to the titled Works of Ford, as “Ford, 

The International Jew, etc., but let it be known that Ford did retract his name from those Works, 

and is such Works here are cited merely for the convenience of The Reader, to distinguish Ford’s 

Work from that of Gerald L.I. Smith’s publications under the same title of The International 

Jew. However, a retraction of ones’ name from the title page does not render that Work 

meaningless nor unusable or untrue. 

The Reader is reminded that as of A.D. 1996, and now 2009, a significant majority 

(perhaps 98% at least) of all public libraries do not have any publication listed in their catalogues 

titled, by any variation, whether as the Protocols of Zion, or The Protocols of the Learned Elders 

[or, Wise Men] of Zion; or The Great in the Small — in which a text of The Protocols were 

Appended; and regardless of those which do list it, none of those libraries have that publication 

on their shelf nor in their library storage possession. On that basis, it is difficult to overcome 

Jewish authors who can quote so profusely and comment in such historical detail to allege the 

“forgery” of The Protocols when no one else seems to be able to find these Works for their 

review and confirmation of that “forgery.” (And yet, the claim of forgery implies that it is a 

deceptively yet perfectly re-presented image of the “original”). 

A CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EMPHASIS IN THE TEXT 

The Text of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, presented for The Reader’s 

consideration, was found in two different publications, both of which were in most all details 

exactly the same, except as noted in the “Annotated Text” of This Book. The Reader will note 

that in the Text presented in This Book’s “Original Text” is the same as the “Annotated Text” — 

being the same exact Text as the “Original,” but with added Sources, Facts, Details and Timely 

Commentary. 

In the “Annotated Text” of This Book, The Reader shall find some helpful explanatory 

text, presented in CAPITAL LETTERING, and placed within brackets “[ — ]”, which shall give 

some prompting as to the general topic discussed by the Author of The Protocols. These 

bracketed words are not part of the “Original Text,” and should not be quoted as part of the 

“Original Text.” 

There are for some reason certain kinds of “emphasis,” placed upon words and/or phrases 

found in the “Original Text;” emphasis such as: CAPITAL LETTERING, or, Italicized Words. 

This is how these words and phrases appeared in the two Sources upon which The Compiler & 

Editor of This Book relies, and there is no original nor any other reliable, confirmed Protocols 

document with which to compare for accuracy. It is doubtful that such emphasis was present in 

the first publication of The Protocols, but that is not as yet possible to prove. 

However, any kind of word-emphasis may, for better or worse, not be advantageous. 

Such emphasis may direct The Readers attention to some important point, believed the 



predecessor of The Compiler & Editor of This Book; however, such emphasis also can easily 

draw that same Reader away from a more important point, which would have been more readily 

discovered, had there been no emphasis at all. 

The Paragraph Numbering, such as “Protocol 1.1, Protocol. 1.2,” etc., has been applied in 

Book Two as a convenient reference point for the Reader in citation; the first Number is the 

Protocol, and the second number is the paragraph within that Protocol. This numbering system 

was not found in any source’s “original text” of The Protocols. 

“...” Concerning any appearance in this version/edition (and in most other editions) of 

The Protocols which are showing the elypsis, or “...”, this is apparently indicating that some of 

the original text — from whatever notes were taken, at whatever meeting they were obtained — 

was deleted prior to the present Compiler & Editor’s coming into possession of this version of 

The Protocols text(s). The present text is from two very similar versions from two distinctly 

different publisher-sources, and yet the two documents read almost exactly like, except for one 

paragraph. (Compare: Protocol No. 3.3 (“issues contend... A little”) and 3.5 (“our agentur... 

Republican”)). 

A reasonable explanation of why this apparently deleted material was not reported may 

be that: 

A) the original secretary, or notetaker did not finish and/or update his (or her?) notes; 

B) the missing text of the speech(es) from which that particular Protocol text was derived 

may have ben deemed by that notetaker as not be worthy of notation; 

C) the missing text was of even more importance than what was written, and therefore as 

secretive, it was not to be put in any writing; 

D) the notetaker, after recording such comments, and being cautioned of the importance 

of the speech(es), deleted such notes; 

E) the notetaker may have somehow (though unlikely) missed these opportunities of 

making complete notations, while desiring not to be observed by anyone else present as the 

notetaker took these now (in)famous notes, or as likely, 

F) the notetaker was not able to keep up with the speaker’s oral delivery, and he was 

fortunate to record what he was able to write. Only an examination of the “original text” of The 

Protocols, or an in-person interview of the notetaker, secretary, etc. — a near impossibility at 

this time — would reveal the reason for the missing text. 

But also, the unusual availability of that original Protocol text to the Jewish author(s), 

speaker(s), attendees, et al., but not to non-Jews, increasingly prevents that discovery. 

Therefore, The Reader must exercise caution in that regard. (Ed.). 

REFERENCE WORKS FOR SPECIFIC WORD DEFINITIONS 

Concerning what a specific word may mean to the average Reader of This Book — who may be 

a Jew but most likely is a non-Jew, and among those, more than likely a so-called “Christian” — 

the following resources have been relied upon for those words which the Compiler and Editor 

believed would need specific definition because of their unique usage in the text, or the 



infrequent use in the daily life of the average reader; or words which, upon textual and thereafter 

definitional examination, revealed a surprising explanation that enhanced greatly one’s 

understanding. However, if a Reader of This Book passes by even one word he or she does not 

understand, that one word could be the influence obstructing the way out of a lack of knowledge 

regarding what is being read. Reference materials include: 

ENGLISH LANGUAGE SOURCES: 

Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition Unabridged, G. & C. Marriam 

Co., Springfield, Mass., 1960 (This edition was said by the more elderly librarians and 

lexicons to this Compiler/Editor as the most reliable). 

Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, West Pub. Co St. Paul, Minn. 1968. 

“ZION, ZIONISM,” DEFINED. 

It helps to also understand what “Zion” and “Zionism” means; here the Reader will find 

only a few of many definitions and comprehensions. 

“‘Zionism’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ are blood brothers. Both terms are reactionary* and 

inimical** to the interests of the working class. It sometimes happens that people of non-Jewish 

nationality trip up on this slippery ground and slide either toward favoring the Zionists, who are 

reactionaries, or toward becoming anti-Semites, who are equally reactionary.” Nikita 

Kruschchev, former premier of the Soviet Union, Khrushchev Remembers; The Last Testament, 

Talbott, Transl./Ed., Boston, Little, Brown & Co. 1974, Chp. 8, p. 178-79. (It is a common trick 

among Jewry to accuse anyone opposed to the methods of modern Jewry to be “anti-Semetic.” 

Ed.). 

* REACTIONARY: favoring return to the older order; to undo the political progress. 

Webst. Int’l. Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 2070. 

** INIMICAL: unfriendly; unfavorable; Webst. Int’l. Dict., 2nd Ed.., p. 1279. 

Zion: The original name of the Jebusite stronghold on the southern part of the eastern hill 

of Jerusalem; after the conquest by the Israelites, it became the royal residence of David and his 

successors, the place of the temple, and the center of Hebrew government, worship and national 

life. Hence, the chosen people, the Israelites. (Webster’s Int’l Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 2982). 

Zionism: Among the modern Jews, [it is] a theory, plan, or movement for colonizing 

their own race in Palestine, the land of Zion, either for religious or nationalizing purposes. (id.). 

Zion is “a synonym for Jerusalem, especially after the destruction of the First Temple, in 

expressing the yearning of the Jewish people for its homeland.” Encycl. Jud., vol 16, p. 1032; 

Potok, 143-147. 

The modern term “Zionism” first appeared at the end of the 19th Century, denoting the 

movement whose goal was the return of the Jewish people to “Erez Israel” [or, the Hebrew name 

for `Land of Israel’] after the First Zionist Congress. (Encycl. Jud., Vol. 16, p. 1032). After the 



destruction of the Second Temple, “Erez Israel” meant “appellation of Promised Land.” (Encycl. 

Jud., Vol. 6, p. 837)]. 

The term “Zionism” was coined by Nathan Birnbaum in his journal Selbstemanzipation 

(April 1, 1890). Birnbaum later expanded the term (in a letter of Nov. 6, 1891, as the 

“establishment of an organization of the national political Zionist party in juxtaposition* to the 

practically oriented party that existed until now [i.e., until 1891].” (Encyc. Jud., Vol. 16, p. 

1032). * Juxtaposition: side-by-side. Webst. Int’l Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 1349. 

Nationalism is the very heart of Zionism. Zionism, by Richard J.H. Gottheil, (Jewish 

Publ. Society of America, Phila., 1914), Chp. “Theodor Herzl,” p. 105. Sometimes described as 

“bourgeois Utopianism.” The Course of Modern Jewish History, Howard Sachar, World Pub. 

Co., N.Y., 1958, p. 293. “A nation within a nation, the czars called it.” id., at 261. 

The Zionisits are part-authors of the anti-Semitism which they profess to slay. Laurie 

Magnus, Aspects of the Jewish Question, London, 1902, p. 18; cited in Zionism, by Richard J.H. 

Gottheil, Jewish Publ. Society of America, Phila., 1914, p. 101. 

Journalist Harold R. Piety observes that “the ugly cry of anti-Semitism is the bludgeon 

used by the Zionists to bully non-Jews into accepting the Zionist view of world events, or to 

keep silent.”. Paul Finley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions confront Israel’s 

Lobby, (Chicago, Lawrence Hill Books, 1985, 1989), p. 296. It has been described by Jewish 

proponents of Zionism as “a usual trick,” which fools the ignorant goyim almost every time. 

“...remembering that though the Jews may seem to be dead, they never really are.” This 

was the Italian fascist ruler Mussolini’s Reply in 1939, in response to the Italian Governor of 

Lybia regarding The Jewish Question and the disasters upon the Jews there, whose subordinate 

advisory comment to Mussolini was: “...the Jews are already a dead people [in Lybia, i.e., so few 

of them, thus of no consequence]; there is no need to oppress them cruelly,....” Norman A. 

Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands in Modern Times, New York (The Jewish Publication Society, 

5751-1991), Part Two, Sources, Chp. 6., World War II and Its Impact, § The Governor of Lybia 

Advises Mussolini to Modify the Application of Italy’s Anti-Jewish Laws in Lybia, p. 420. 

JEWISH RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR SOURCES: 

More than a few publications relied upon in the research prior to publishing this version 

of The Protocols. Works cited herein are of Jewish authors and/or Jewish publishers. Mr. Ted 

Pike — a Christian knowledgeable in Judaism and one devoted to enlightening Sephardic or 

Sephardim, Ashkanazi or Ashkenazim, and other styled Jews about the ills of Talmudic Judaism 

— has this to say about Judaism, and his words reflect the beginning of enlightenment of the true 

meaning and intent of The Protocols of Zion” (or whatever other name that document or that 

document’s intent may have as its label): 

Is there something about Judaism itself that acts as an abrasive upon this 

land [and upon all the people on it]? To answer that question, we don’t need to 

make [yet] another pilgrimage to Palestine; we don’;t need to visit historic sites or 


Jewish shrines. Instead, since Judaism is very much a religion of its literature, we 

need to go where its most sacred teachings are preserved. We need to go to a 

synagogue, in particular, to the library of the synagogue. In every synagogue 

library, we find hundreds of books, but there are a few which tower over the rest 

in authority. These include the Encyclopedia Judaica, the Universal Jewish 

Encyclopedia, and the Jewish Encyclopedia. In the oldest of these, the Jewish 

Encyclopedia, we encounter fascinating new perspectives on the inner teachings 

of Judaism. Perspectives which are well known to most religious Jews, but 

unknown to Christians. Most Christians believe that the Judaism of the Old 

Testament is very similar to J today. Yet the Jewish Encyclopedia, in its article 

on “Judaism,” says modern Judaism and the Judaism of the Old Testament are 

very different.” (Ted Pike, The Other Israel, 1987 video, Box 203, Oregon City, 

Oregon 97045). 

This quote should inspire The Reader to visit any large city public library, at least, to find 

the books relied upon by The Compiler and Editor of This Book, to prove the truthfulness of the 

allegations made herein and to further understand “The Jewish Question” and its “Christian 

Answer” — which should be: Expose Judaism as an “inflicted mental illness,” and bring the 

deceived Jews out of their own unseen though very much plainly felt bondage, a bondage 

imposed upon them by their spiritual leaders. 

========================================= 

Part 1. 

HELPFUL INFORMATION 

CONCERNING THE READER 

of This Book 

The book which is now held in the hands of The Reader, is One of the many Translations 

of the famous (or infamous) document, variously titled also, officially or otherwise, as The 

Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion, or, The Protocols of the Wise Men of 

Zion, or, The Protocols of Meetings of the Wise Men of Zion, or simply, The Protocols of Zion. 

Many times in this Book, the Reader will see it referred to simply as The Protocols. 1/ The Name 

is less significant than The Message. 

The Reader of this Book must be forewarned: the Contents of this Publication address a 

very sensitive Topic. Many who will now read This Book — and many millions who have not 

or will not — have been totally unaware of the provable Truths expressed herein. This is so, 

merely because non-readership of these people either don’t know, or they often chose to 

continue in ignorance rather than consider the truth. “Ignorance” can be defined many ways, as 

in: a) lack of knowledge, or not knowing of it — a genuine situation for anyone regarding any 

particular subject-matter about which they are uninformed, or b) “ignore-ance,” the act of 

ignoring, — an act which is a deliberate rejection of, or consideration of, any such knowledge, 

1 SIMPLY AS THE PROTOCOLS. The “evidence” is more persuasive and supportive of the 

accusation that The Protocols of Zion are Jewish in origin, when considering the name used to 

label it, i.e.: “Protokoll,” meaning, “minutes, record.” Klatt & Golze, Langenscheidt’s German- 

English Dict. (New York, Washington Sq. Press, 1929, 1952) p. 175. 

Page -11-


based upon some prejudice — and, it presumes a prior knowledge of the topic, limited though 

that knowledge may be, to “justify” that rejection or inconsideration. 

Because of a heavy pre-conditioning of the individual mind and thought process, induced 

by The Adversary, its Government, and Its well-regulated Public School System — and 

thereafter reinforced by the constant Influence of the daily “Programmed” News and 

Entertainment Media, the average individual thinker in this century — and as it now goes, into 

the next century — has been sensitized to Insensitivity; to reject all but the “Programmed 

Opinion,” the “politically correct” stand, which would be acceptable thereto — and therefore, 

such individuals would be, in a wholesale and a very unconscious manner, cooperative in a nonresponse 

manner to any other Understanding, even if it would awaken them to The Truth. To 

those, The Reader must for the moment, turn away quietly. They will see The Light soon 

enough or never. Leave them. 

This means plainly that to understand this Book and its Accompanying Texts and Notes 

— even to complete the Reading of it, the individual, as The Reader of This Book, must disabuse 

Himself or Herself of any preconceived Notions of “What is Truth.” 2/ To do this, one 

must simply read and question the words plainly found in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of 

Zion, and then question the intent of the text and question the individual’s thoughts generated by 

those words. Compare the words and thoughts to the reality one sees in the “news and 

information media” (i.e., radio, newspapers, television; editorials, articles, “theatrical” 

productions, advertisements, etc.); and in practical life itself; then, compare these same to the 

comprehension one has to that media. It will not be too long before The Reader of This Book 

sees the theories of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion played out right there before 

their own eyes in those news and information medias. Too many times The Compiler & Editor 

of This Book has seen this borne out as true, and the course of immediate history, as with ancient 

history, has always followed this Protocol Plan to an uncanny obedience; unless non-Jews 

awaken to this ill-begotten threat, these Plans will continue into the future. 

“Whether they [The Protocols] were genuine in an historical sense or not was not the 

issue. Their inner truth was what made them so convincing.” 3/ 

The following phrases have been found in Zionism (Movements in Judaism), Richard 

J.H. Gotthiel (Phila., The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1914), at Notes, p. 217, 225- 

227: 

“Protokoll des Ersten Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes [of the] First Zionist-Congress 

“Protokolle und Aktenstuck der Zweiten Rabbiner-Versammlung,” 

Minutes and records [of the] Second Rabbi-Assembly 

2 WHAT IS TRUTH. The classic Question of Pilate put to Jesus Christ, yet written only in The 

Gospel According to John, Chp. 18, verse 38. 

3 THEIR INNER TRUTH WAS WHAT MADE THEM SO CONVINCING.. Levy, A Lie & A 

Libel, p. 30, re: Segel, p. 46, at n. 10, quoting Hermann Rauschning, Gespräche mit Hitler 

(Zurich, 1940, reprint Vienna, 1973), p. 225. 



“Protokoll des Dritten Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes [of the] Third Zionist-Congress 

“Protokoll...des Funften Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes [of the] Fifth Zionist-Congress 

“Protokoll...des Sechsten Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes...[of the] Sixth Zionist-Congress 

“Protokoll des Siebenten Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes [of the] Seventh Zionist-Congress 

“Protokoll des Achten Zionisten-Kongresses,” 

Minutes [of the] Eighth Zionist-Congress 

“Protokoll des Neunten Zionisten-Kongresses.” 

Minutes [of the] Ninth Zionist-Congress. 

Part 2. 

CONCERNING VICTOR MARSDEN, 4/ 

The Translator of The Present Document, 

The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion, 

After He Translated Such Document 

From the Russian into the English Language 

This Translation has been ably accomplished by the late Victor E. Marsden. Mr. 

Marsden was himself a victim of the Russian Bolshevik Revolution of 1918, and continued for 

long afterwards to be a Victim of that Jewish Revolution against the Lawful Government of 

Russia. Mr. Marsden had lived for many years in Czarist Russia, and was married to a Russian 

lady. Among his other Activities in Russia, he had been for a number of years Russian 

Correspondent of the English newspaper, The Morning Post, a position which he occupied when 

the Bolshevik Revolution occurred. His vivid descriptions of the Events in Revolutionary Russia 

will still be in the recollection of many of the Historical Readers of that Journal and/or History in 

general, as they search for the chronology of those Truths. 

Naturally, because of this close contact with both the Czarist Russia and the Translation 

of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Mr. Marsden was singled out to receive the 

anger of the new Jewish “Soviet 5/ .” He was arrested and thrown into a Bolshevik prison, 

expecting every day to have his name called out for execution. Execution, however, he escaped, 

and eventually he was allowed to return to England, very much a wreck in bodily health. He 

4 CONCERNING MARSDEN. Much of the information on Marsden has been gained from an 

undated book by Gerald L.K. Smith (Nat’l Dir. of The Christian Nationalist Crusade), titled The 

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, pp. 3-4. (Christian Nationalist Crusade, P.O. Box 

27895, Los Angeles, Calif. — a closed P.O. box); information has not been confirmed. (Ed.). 

5 

The “Soviet” or, Council of representatives, in Bolshevik U.S.S.R. (Webster’s Int’l Dict. 2nd 

Ed., (1960) p. 2406). 



recovered under treatment and the devoted care of his wife and friends. One of the first things 

he undertook as soon as he was able was this translation of The Protocols the Reader now holds. 

Mr. Marsden was eminently well qualified for the work. His intimate acquaintance with 

Russia, the Russian life and the Russian language, and his mastery of a terse literary English 

style, placed him in a position of advantage and authority which few others could claim. The 

consequence is that we have in his version of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion an 

eminently readable work; and though the subject-matter is somewhat formless — probably the 

result of the incomplete material which he translated, Mr. Marsden’s literary touch reveals the 

thread running through the twenty-four Protocols known extant. 

It may be said with truth that this work of translating The Protocols was carried out at the 

cost of Mr. Marsden’s own life. He told the writer of the Preface to The Protocols edition 

presented by the Christian Nationalist Crusade 6/ that he could not tolerate more than an hour at a 

time of his work on it while at the British Museum: “the diabolical spirit of the matter which he 

was obliged to turn into English made him positively ill,” it is written. 

Mr. Marsden’s connection with the Morning Post was not severed by his return to 

England, and he was as well enough to accept the post of special correspondent of that journal in 

the suite of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales (NAME) while on his Empire tour. From this tour Mr. 

Marsden returned with the Prince, apparently in much better health, but within a few days of his 

landing he was taken suddenly ill, and died after a very brief illness. 7/ 

“May this work be his crowning monument!” as it has been sought. In that Work, he has 

performed an immense service to the Christian world in general, and to the English-speaking 

world in particular. There can be little doubt that this edition of The Protocols will takes its 

place in the first rank of the English versions of this same The Protocols of The Learned Elders 

of Zion. 

Because Mr. Marsden was a master in both English and Russian, his translation of The 

Protocols is generally regarded as being thoroughly accurate and dependable. It is Mr. 

Marsden’s translation which The Reader of This Book will have for consideration. 

Part 3. 

CONCERNING SERGYEI NILUS 8/ 

The Translator of the original Protocols 

From the Russian language into English 

6 CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST CRUSADE. The address at one time was the “Christian 

Nationalist Crusade, P.O. Box 27895, Los Angeles 27, California.” It is now expired, with no 

forwarding address as of March, 1996. 

7 SUDDENLY ILL.... Winrod, The Truth About the Protocols, Preface, p. 4. Consider Protocol 

15.9, n. ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED,... 

8 CONCERNING NILUS. Much of the information on Nilus has been gained from an undated 

booklet by Gerald B. Winrod (Editor of The Defender), titled The Truth About The Protocols, 

pp. 17-23 (Liberty Bell Pub., Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 25270), and that information has not 

been confirmed. (Ed.). 



About The Protocols of the Meetings of The Learned Elders of Zion themselves, little 

need be said to those aware of the matters, in the way of introduction. The book first presenting 

them, titled The Great in the Small, or The Advent of the AntiChrist and the Approaching Rule of 

the Devil on Earth, 1st Ed., 1901, in which these protocols are embodied as an appendix, was 

published by Sergyei (or, Sergi) Nilus, accomplished in Russia in dates which are not easily 

confirmed; anywhere from 1905 to 1907; and, in subsequent editions thereafter. 9/ The Protocols 

were themselves merely related to that larger Nilus Work, which described the Jewish — and 

perhaps limited only to Zionist — plans for world domination. 

A copy of Nilus translation of The Protocols document itself — whether titled The Great 

in The Small or, The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion — may be found in the British Museum 

bearing the date of its reception into the Museum’s possession as: August 10, 1906. It is alleged, 

but not confirmed by The Compiler & Editor of This Book, that its library catalogue number or 

“Call Number” is: “C 37.C31,” and that number may be different, today. 

Mr. Nilus has also written other books on the topic of “The Jewish Question.” On the 

pages of The Protocols The Reader would find twenty-four documents, or chapters, which 

purport to reveal the inner workings of a plot by certain international Jewish leaders of late 

1890’s to enslave the non-Jewish world through a dictatorship based upon the power of gold; 

though not merely by gold alone, but by every means available — including but not limited to 

the Press, the Political (Government) Institution(s), the religious establishments, etc. (Much of 

the present day “Christian” church doctrines, Catholic and Protestant, have by ignorant acts — 

based upon “instruction” from The Seminary” 10/ adulterated the “Original Intent” of the Gospel, 

to the point where only a concerted effort could have gained such a twisted result). 

Mr. Nilus first published The Protocols is alleged to have occurred in 1905, although the 

document(s) had come into his hands four years earlier. Nilus regarded his work of translating 

the document as a patriotic and religious duty to give The Protocols the widest possible 

circulation. From the beginning of Judaism’s desire to keep the birthright which was stolen from 

the True Nation of Israel — being none other then the present day Christian peoples in America, 

and continuing through the years, and the centuries right down to the present hour, the plot 

which these documents disclose had been fulfilled, step-by-step. In these acts, we can see the 

steady advancement and the unfoldment of the economic and political history of the Jewish and 

Gentile nations of this world. 

9 PUBLICATION DATE. There are conflicting dates of publication of The Protocols; some say 

it was in 1890’s, or in 1902; others, in 1905 or 1907. As is the case with any instrument political 

of design, it should be the intent, and the historical events derive from the instrument, that 

affirms the truthfulness of that instrument. (Ed.). 

10 THE SEMINARY. A good friend of The Compiler & Editor of The Book, the late Rev. Capt. 

Lenny Bell, of San Diego, had used the more descriptive, though probably unintentional erring, 

word “Cemetery” — i.e, àfter one went to cemetery school.’ The interpretation here being in 

this sense: the true impulse of Christian service has been destroyed by the meaningless rituals of 

modern Judeo-Christianity, which is an abnormal mixture of Judaism and Christianity — an act 

which destroys the Christian ethics in favor of neutrality, to the advantage of Judaic desires. See 

the Part regarding “Paul” as the Deceiver of early Christians. (Ed.). 



All copies of The Protocols that were known to exist in Russia were alleged to have been 

destroyed in the Kerensky 11/ regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy of it by 

anyone in Soviet-land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner’s being executed, apparently 

literally on-sight. That fact is in itself certainly persuasive proof of the genuineness of The 

Protocols and of its danger to those individuals and groups exposing anyone using it as their 

template for obtaining world domination. 

The Compiler & Editor’s search of the many libraries, public, university and other, fails 

to find any of the Nilus — or of any other — version of The Protocols on its shelves, even 

though most of them have the book listed in its catalogue, by title and by author. The Work is 

said by library employees to be “missing or stolen,” and unless this edition of The Protocols is 

placed with those libraries, it will never again be seen by its patrons. 

Part 4. 

EXCERPTS FROM NILUS’ PROTOCOLS, 

FROM VARIOUS CITED SOURCES 

(Most of them Being Jewish). 

The following are some of the few excerpts of text from Introductions, Prefaces, etc., 

from Nilus’ Works. These quotations are from entirely Jewish sources, as cited, and if the Jews 

say it is so, and if they make no objection to the exactness of the words they complain of as 

“anti-semitic,” who then are we to complain on that point? AS mentioned many times in This 

Book Series, the availability of any Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion documents is scarce, 

so we will accept the Jewish offerings. 

Nilus stated in his 2nd edition of 1905: 

In the Year 1901 I came into my possession through the agency of a friend 

a handwritten manuscript. In it is an unusually detailed and truthful 12/ account of 

the development of a world-spanning Masonic-Jewish conspiracy that shall lead 

11 KERENSKY. Alexander Foedorovich Kerensky (1881-1970) was an early leader of the 

Russian Revolution of 1917 in Russia. As a lawyer, he was famous for court-defenses of those 

accused by the Czar of revolutionary activities. After the Revolution, Kerensky became premier, 

but failed to keep it — the Communist Bolshevik Revolution overthrew his nàive government 

within 6 months. He fled Russia, ultimately to the United States, where he eventually was on the 

staff of The Hoover Institution, for Russian Revolution studies. (World Book Encycl., Vol. 11, J- 

K, p. 234, Chicago, 1973). Mr Kerensky’s optimism may be compared to Theodor Herzl, the 

alleged founder of the Zionist Congresses and supposed author of The Protocols: they both had 

high ideals which were undermined by strongmen who had other, more selfish, plans. (Ed.). 

12 UNUSUALLY DETAILED AND TRUTHFUL. How would Nilus know the extend of any 

“details” more or less than exist in the original document, or know of the “truthfulness” of that 

document which had not been verified or proven by the original or other reliable source? The 

Compiler & Editor asks The Reader to consider that very few people have ever seen an original 

edition of The Protocols, so not even the text can be verified by us as “truthful.” We must, then, 

consider the message, unverified. (Ed.). 



our ruined world to its inevitable destruction. This manuscript, entitled the 

Protocols of the Elders of Zion, I transmit to all those who will to hear, to see, and 

comprehend.” 13/ 

Also in his 1905 edition of The Great in the Small, Nilus writes: 

In 1901, when I came into possession of the manuscript, it was like the miracle of 

a blind man seeing again. The manuscript was titled The Protocols of the Elders 

of Zion, and I received it from the late leader of the Tchernigov nobility, 

Alexander Nikolaievich Sukhotin. He related to me that he had obtained it from a 

lady, an expatriate. He told me her name, but I have forgotten it 14/ ...He said that 

this lady had received the manuscript in a somewhat mysterious way, by theft, I 

believe...When I became acquainted with the contents of the manuscript, I was 

convinced that its horrible cruelty, its implacable truthfulness, bore witness to its 

true origins — the Elders of Zion. 15/ 

From Nilus’ 1911 edition, two quotes: 

In 1901 a now deceased acquaintance.... 

The educated non-Jewish reader will see in his daily life and in the lightning-like 

events that have struck Russia and all of Europe a fullness of evidence for the 

authenticity of the Protocols. Whoever can think logically will soon be 

convinced of its genuineness. 16/ 

In the 1917 edition of his The Protocols, Nilus says: 

My book with all the Protocols is now appearing in its fourth edition, but now for 

the first time I have learned from authoritative Jewish sources that the Protocols 

is nothing but the strategic plan of world conquest whereby the world will be 

brought under Israel’s yoke, the enemy of God. The plan, worked out by leaders 

of the Jewish people during the many centuries of the Diaspora, was finally 

disclosed to the Elders of the Prince of the Exile, Theodor Herzl, at the time of the 

first Zionist Congress in Basel [held in August, 1897]. 17/ 

13 NILUS’ 2ND EDITION PARAGRAPH. Levy, A Lie and A Libel, re: Segel, “History,” at p. 

111. 

14 

A CONTACT-SOURCE’S NAME FORGOTTEN. For a matter this important — or 

unimportant, the name of a contact person would be best forgotten, to protect them. That is an 

age-old strategic ploy, more effective than any “federal witness protection program.” (Ed.). 

15 

NILUS’ QUOTATION ON SOURCES. See: Levy, A Lie & A Libel, in Segel’s “History,” at 

p. 72. Which edition of Nilus’ Works is not known mentioned by Segel. 

16 THE EDUCATED NON-JEWISH READER. Levy, A Lie & A Libel, re: Segel, “History,” p. 

72. 

17 NILUS’ ON HIS 1917 EDITION. See: Levy, A Lie & A Libel, id., p. 72. 



At this, Binjamin Segel, the Jewish “historian” of The Protocols suggests Nilus had no 

idea of any connection between The Protocols and the “Herzl Zionists of Basel”, 18/ even though 

world events were quickly confirming their predictions, as Henry Ford had stated — one reason 

why Mr. Ford published articles regarding The Protocols in his newspapers. Segel suggests that 

Nilus’ (1917) edition also stated the theft of The Protocols was perpetrated in 1901 against the 

author of them — Herzl himself, and at his home. Herzl is said to consider it apparently as an 

“indiscretion.” Nilus, writing apparently about Herzl, said: 

It has not been established in what ways this document, containing the holiest of 

Israel’s ambitions and the centuries-old mystery of its leaders, mad its way into 

the world of the uninitiated. As already mentioned, it was handed over to me in 

1901. In that year, Theodor Herzl confirmed in circular no 18 that certain 

confidential information, despite stern warning to the contrary, had not remained 

secret but rather had been given undesirable publicity. 19/ 

According to the “conclusion” of a Nilus associate, The Protocols are alleged to have 

been “signed by the representatives of Zion, not to be confused with the representatives of the 

Zionist movement,” 20/ but no one has mentioned that nor provided any names. 

It is most interesting that the Jewish “historian” Binjamin Segel, and later perhaps his 

“editor and translator,” Richard Levy, can find all these books on or about The Protocols, while 

so many others — i.e., non-Jews — cannot find them, because of the scarcity of those books, or 

for their strangely short library shelf-life, if any existed there at all. It is difficult for either side 

to portray the truth of the matter when the Jewish Adversaries do not use more than occasional 

quotations of The Protocols in their defense, and probably steal all the Works their Adversaries 

would use to confirm those quotations. We as non-Jews, however, have as full a text as is 

known, derived from as reliable a source as is available — and again, It is their Inner Truth that 

makes them so convincing; the Message matters most. 

Part 5. 

CONCERNING THE PROTOCOLS DOCUMENT, 

WHICH “FIT THE SITUATION” 

Second to The Holy Bible, this Protocols volume having been translated into many 

different languages of the world, has also been said to be ont of the most widely read documents 

in existence. 21/ The Superintendent of the British Museum has previously stated that he 

constantly receives inquiries about The Protocols, from all parts of the world. 

18 NILUS’ QUOTATION ON SOURCES. See: Levy, A Lie & A Libel, in., at p. 72 

19 NILUS’ (1917) RE: “CIRCULAR NO. 18.” No “circular no. 18” has been found to support 

that Nilus-claim — but how would it be, if it was circulated only among the “Herzl Zionists.” 

See: Levy, A Lie & A Libel, in., at p. 73. 

20 PROTOCOLS, SIGNED. Levy, id., citing Buhmi, at p. 74 

21 THE MOST WIDELY READ DOCUMENT. Despite its absurdities, it has been distributed in 

millions of copies, and must rank very near to the Bible in the number of languages into which it 

has been translated. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. 8, “War Against the Jews,” at p. 108, 

n. 37, citing Cohn, Warrant for Genocide. 



The book was received by the British Museum — England’s greatest library, on August 

10, 1906. It was purchased through regular trade channels, and there was nothing extraordinary 

about the manner i which it reached the Museum. 

The Protocols are alleged to have originated from the secret operations of the ancient 

Jewish Kahal, and the rebirth of Jewish nationalism, involving the building of Zionism and 

Communism, and also 

This is not the first of any such Protocols, or instructions, for the Jews. In 1492, Chemor, 

the Chief Rabbi of Spain wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, then located in Constantinople (today 

that city is called Istanbul) for advice on how to handle certain problems he had. The response 

received indicates The Sanhedrin was even then holding sway over the Jewish people. Napoleon 

called the Jews to assemble The Sanhedrin to solidify his power. 22/ However, some Jews insist 

that The Sanhedrin does not exist. 23/ 

The Protocols addressed in this book had apparently originated at a “world-wide” 

(actually, European-wide) meeting of a small number of influential Jews at the first Zionist 

Congress, held at Basil, Switzerland, in 1897. This event, followed annually by other Zionist 

Congresses, is generally considered as the pivot point on which the rebirth of Jewish nationalism 

turned. 24/ 

The first translation from the Russian language into the English language was published 

in 1920, by Eyre & Spottiswood, the official printers of the British government. Victor E. 

Marsden made another translation at about the same time, who had previously. 

Mr. Henry Ford. Sr., the founder of the automobile production line and thereafter The 

Ford Motor Company, discussed The Protocols in an interview published in The New York 

World, 25/ February 17th, 1921, wherein he put the case for the Nilus publication of The Protocols 

tersely and convincingly, saying: 

The only statement I care to make about The Protocols is that they tie in with 

what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world 

situation up to this time. They fit now. 26/ 

22 

NAPOLEON AND THE SANHEDRIN. See, Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, p. 581-83 (1971 

ed.); The New Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 127-28 (1962 ed); Sachar, Course of Modern Jewish 

History, chp. V., “Rise of Zionism,” p. 271-272. 

23 THE SANHEDRIN, “ABOLISHED.” “Around 425 C.E....[t]he Sanhedrin came to an end.” 

Chaim Potok, Wanderings: History of the Jews, Book Two, “Through Classical Paganism,” 

“Palestine: Rabbis from Yavneh,” p. 232. 

24 THE PIVOT POINT OF ZIONISM. [cites needed]. 

25 THE NEW YORK WORLD. See, The New York World (Owner: J. Pulitzer), February 17th, 

1921, p. . 

26 . THEY FIT NOW. For what “fits,” see The International Jew: The world’s Foremost 

Problem, and the in the 4 volume set, published by The Dearborn Publishing Co., Dearborn, 

Michigan, 1920-1922; reprinted by Liberty Bell Publ., P.O. Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 

25270. 



Part 6. 

THE WORD “PROTOCOL,” DEFINED. 

The word “protocol” 27/ signifies a “precis” 28/ gummed on to the front of a document; or, a 

draft of a document, or, minutes of a proceeding. In this instance, “protocol” means the minutes 

of the proceedings of “The Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion,” also known as “The 

Meetings of the Wise Men of Zion.” These protocols, or minutes, give the substance of 

addresses delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion. 29/ Often, this Zion-entity may 

be titled “The World Jewish Congress,” or “The International,” or other Jewish labels for groups 

bent on, or appearing to be bent on, ultimately obtaining a world domination by the Jews. 

The Protocols, when read objectively, reveal the concerted plan of action of the Jewish 

Nation, developed through the ages and edited by The Elders themselves to this date. Parts and 

summaries of the plan have been published from time to time during the centuries, as the secrets 

of The Elders have leaked out — for whatever reason. 

Part 7. 

THE PROTOCOLS IN HISTORY, 

AS WRITTEN BY THE JEWS 30/ 

Nilus’ book has been described by recent Jewish historians as being: 

“an addendum to a hopelessly confused religious tract written by Serge Nilus, a 

czarist civil servant. 31/ According to Nilus, the wise men of Zion 32/ had entered 

27 PROTOCOL, defined. A “protocol” is the first leaf glued to the rolls of papyrus and the 

notarial documents, on which an account of the manuscript was written. (Webster’s Int’l Dict. 

2nd Ed., p. 1991); a record or register; a writing at the head of the first page of a paper used by 

the notaries or tabelliones. (Black’s Law Dict., 4th Ed. Rev., (1968, St. paul, Minn.), p. 1388). 

28 PRECIS, defined. A concise epitome or abstract, as a book or case; a brief summary of 

essential points, statements, or facts. Webster’s Int’l Dict., 2nd Ed., (1960, Springfield, Mass.), 

p. 1944. 

29 ZION, defined. See above in this Book One, at § Zion, Zionism, Defined. 

30 HISTORY WRITTEN BY THE JEWS. See also, the Levy, A Lie and a Libel, above. 

31 NILUS, THE CZARIST CIVIL SERVANT. Mr. Nilus was never a civil servant of the 

Russian Czar, and none of the reference material the Compiler & Editor of this Book has 

suggested he was; it is, however, a convenient statement of justification made in a history book 

written for Jewish students. The Introduction, Concerning Mr. Nilus, found at the fore of this 

Book, will describe and confirm his employ as a only reporter for English newspaper, The 

Morning Post. “Mis-information” is part of a ploy, and has been used in many other ways of 

deception. 

32 THE WISE MEN OF ZION. The Reader will note that the author of this Jewish historical 

source dies not deny the existence of any such religious-styled deliberative or legislative body 

known as “the wise men of Zion.” 



into a `secret’ plot to enslave the Christian 33/ world. The leaders of the Jewish 

world government, who were variously identified as the chiefs of the twelve 

tribes of Israel 34/ and the leaders of world Zionism, planned to employ the 

institutions of liberalism and socialism to ensnare and befuddle the simpleminded 

“goyim.” In the event of the Gentile’s discovery of the plans of 

international, revolutionary Jewry, the Jewish Elders apparently had plans for 

blowing up all the capitals of Europe. 35/ The implication was plain: that resistance 

to liberalism and socialism was vital if the world was to be rescued from a 

malevolent Jewish conspiracy. 

In 1921 the London Times exposed the Protocols as a crude forgery of a 

lampoon on Napoleon III, written as far back as 1864. Notwithstanding the 

exposure, it was the interest of reactionaries 36/ everywhere to promote the 

circulation of the Nilus pamphlet. In the United States, Boris Brasol, a czarist 

émigré, persuaded a group of American business leaders, among them the motor 

magnate Henry Ford, to publicize the Protocols. Ford was a capable enough 

automobile manufacturer; but his understanding of world affairs was 

astonishingly limited, and even more profoundly illiberal and bigoted. For 

several years his private newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, quoted liberally 

from the Protocols and issued repeated warnings against the Jewish menace. Not 

until 1927, when a Jewish attorney, Aaron Sapiro, brought a libel suit against The 

Dearborn Independent, did Ford repudiate his anti-Semitism and issue a public 

apology.” 37/ 

33 

ENSLAVE THE CHRISTIAN WORLD. Here, the Jewish historians will push the religious 

“hot-button,” by referring only to the “Christian” enslavement, not to the enslavement of any 

other religion; perhaps Jewish historians in this manner desire to obtain the (un)Christian 

reaction they need to provoke more of their own “anti-semitism.” (See above, at § Zion, 

Zionism, Defined, and elsewhere, regarding the Jewish view that adherents and promoters of 

“Zionism” willingly create many of the Jewish troubles). 

Further, It is apparent from reading Mr. Nilus’ translation of The Protocols that it is not 

merely the “Christian world” that was intended to be “enslaved,” but all non-Jews — the goyim 

— as well; no prejudice can be seen, regarding who will be and who will not be enslaved, on the 

part of these “Wise or Learned Men.” 

34 THE CHIEFS OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL. This usual reference by Jewish 

writers — that “Israel” is Jewish — is a bold-faced lie, designed “to ensnare and befuddle the 

simple-minded “goyim.” They have been successful, and can be easily proven a lie, unless the 

Reader has not critically read the Old and New Testaments, having been brought up in the 

modern-day “Judeo-Christian” church and its “lower than the Jew” ethics. (Ed.). 

35 BLOWING UP ALL THE CAPITALS OF EUROPE. Lenin: Àccuse your enemies of what 

you are guilty of.’ [Cites needed]. 

36 

REACTIONARIES. All Jewish liberals and activists are considering themselves to be 

“reactionaries,” probably in the idea of returning world power back to their control. [cites 

needed] 

37 

RECENT JEWISH HISTORIANS AS A SOURCE. The Course of Modern Jewish History, 

Howard M. Sachar (World Pub. Co., N.Y., 1958) p. 340-341. 



Regardless of the above Jewish historian’s rhetoric, there are no direct references of 

violent destruction of buildings, etc., found in The Protocols of the Learned (or, Wise) Men of 

Zion, even though the Jews have on many occasions resorted almost at first the violent means of 

destruction of non-Jewish peoples and possessions to make their often Zionist arguments. Even 

so, this idea of Jewish terrorist activities against non-Jewish governments is also set forth in 

more recent books by Jewish authors: 

“Among the strange `secrets’ revealed in the book [The Protocols] is that...the 

Jews ordered the building of underground railways in the major cities of Europe 

so that when the time comes they can blow up any capital which resists their 

[Jewish] rule.” 38/ 

That statement is enough to make most any non-Jew laugh — yet few non-Jews would 

have believed the Jews capable of callously blowing up the King David Hotel in Palestine in 

A.D. July, 1946, with over 100 dead, merely to emphasize a Jewish determination to establish a 

Jewish “State of Israel” — a conduct which that Jewish “State” now attempts, by its historical 

hypocrisy, to prohibit when such terrorism and senseless violence is applied by the Palestinian 

peoples to obtain their own “State of Palestine.” Nor do those who believe in the Protocols find 

it odd that the Jews, in their own secret writings, should cast themselves in the role of agents of 

evil, and should moreover do so in the specific terminology of Christian anti-Semitism.” 39/ 

Despite these and “many other similar absurdities,” The Protocols have been distributed 

in millions of copies, and according to the Jewish source relied upon for this Edition, The 

Protocols must rank very near to the Bible in the number of languages into which it has been 

translated. 40/ “Ìt was incomparably done,’ Hitler was to write in Mein Kampf.” 41/ 

Even so, The Protocols plainly are description, in part, of a Jewish “terrorist” attack plan 

— something which the modern-day pre- and present-Jewish “State of Israel” has been, and 

continues to be, preeminently qualified to plan and execute. History shows that fact to be true, 

and any who imitate that plan, such as today’s “Palestinian Liberation Organization” (P.L.O.), 

are hypocritically condemned by Jews — a.k.a. “Israelis” — as “terrorists.” 

The above quoted Jewish historian continues: 

38 BLOW UP ANY CAPITAL WHICH RESISTS. This idea is repeated in 1986 by Bernard 

Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, id., Chp. 4, Anti-Semites, at p. 108; Levy, A Lie and a Libel, id., 

re: Segel’s “History” comments at p. 93 and at n. 30, Levy’s editorial comments. 

39 JEWS IN THE ROLE OF AGENTS OF EVIL. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. Four, 

“Anti-Semites,” at p. 108. 

40 

NUMBER OF LANGUAGES TRANSLATED. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, at p. 108, n. 

37, citing Cohn, id., Warrant for Genocide. 

41 IT WAS INCOMPARABLY DONE. Lucy S. Davidowicz, The War Against the Jews: 1933- 

1945 (New York, Bantam, 1975), p. 20. See also, Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, (London, Hurst & 

Blackett, Ltd., 1942, James Murphy, Translator), Book I., Chp.XI., pp 423-424. 



However, the confluence 42/ of all these factors — American provincialism 43/ , rural 

suspicion of the cities, the eugenics theory 44/ the fear of alien radicalism, even, 

42 CONFLUENCE. The act of flowing, running, or coming together; combined. Webst. Int’l. 

Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 561. 

43 

PROVINCIALISM. “Provincialism” is the exclusive interest in, or the overwhelming to one’s 

own province; in defence to that which is alien, unfamiliar, or diverse. (Webster’s Int’l Dict., 

2nd Ed., p. 1994). There is nothing wrong with provincialism, since it allows the local people to 

control their own life — something which is totally adverse to the “world/global power” desired 

by the international Jews. It is only consistent that Jewish historians criticize the long-standing 

American desire for “provincialism,” or, `local-control through local attitudes.’ 

44 EUGENICS THEORY. The theory of “eugenics” is the science which deals with influences, 

primarily those admitting of social control, that improve inborn or hereditary qualities in a series 

of generations of a race or breed, esp. in the human race. (Webst. 2nd Int’l. Dict. (1060) p. 880. 

By 1914, Americans were becoming aware that Jews, as a race, were a race apart from 

the traditional “White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant” (WASP) race that made America great; that 

Jews were “Semitic” as distinguished (i.e., considered separately) from “Aryan” race. WASP 

intellectuals John R. Commons, Edward A. Ross, Henry Pratt Fairchild, etc., encouraged 

“eugenics” so that “Anglo-Saxons would avoid admixture with ìnferior’ breeds.” (Sachar, 

Course of Modern Jewish History, Chp. XVI, “Russian Jewry’s `Liberal’ Tradition in America,” 

p. 340; also, Ford, The International Jew, Vol. III, “Jewish Influences in American Life, Chp. 

LV., “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 167; Dearborn Independent, May 14, 1921. 

See also, Intro. of This Book, at note, THEY WERE NOT WELCOME ANYWHERE ELSE). 

“In the Soviet Union, Jews are officially considered to comprise a `nationality,’ just like 

the Russians, Latvians, or Georgians.” Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament, Talbott, 

Transl./Ed., Boston, Little, Brown & Co. 1974, Chp. 9, p.187, n. 9. 

The “eugenics” theory is not appreciated by pure-raced peoples, until the moment 

dreaded in the heart of every father and mother when their daughter or son marries — or 

propagates children by — a member of another race, i.e., white, black, yellow, brown, red mixed 

together. When the children of that “union” are seen and show features offset from their parental 

model, the society of each race rejects that child, and rightly so. Thereby, the prophecy of 

Exodus, Chp. 20:5 is then realized: “visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the 

third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me”. (In Accord: Exodus Chp 34:7; Lev. 20:5; 

26:39-40; Num. 14:18, 33; 1st Kings 21.29; Job 5:4, 21:19; Ps. 109:14; Is. 14:21; 65:7. But there 

is hope. Ps. 79:8). It is not as though we have not been told, from “time out of mind,” of this 

necessary act of racial purity of the Israelite blood; and the Jews — imposer-Israelites — know 

this. However, there are enough books written on the subject of racial purity and its benefits; 

read them. (Ed.). 

The Jews strictly limit their own marriages to “Semites” — upon expulsion from the 

Jewish “family” at-large of any Jew violating that unwritten “rule,” and Jews demand the entire 

world respect their marriage-laws; at the same time, these same Jews complain bitterly when 

other races of people, i.e., the non-Jews, attempt to accomplish the same “pure blood” of their 

children. There is nothing wrong with parents of any race desiring their children to appear just 

like they do — and all their ancestors have. (Ed.). 

See also, The Protocols regarding Jewish claim of “genius,” at Nos. 1.18, 1.26, 2.2, 5.6, 

5.11, 10.2, 10.6. Eugenics, is in this instance, purely an improvement of Jewish qualities which, 

for “time out of mind,” humanity had rejected. (Ed.). 



perhaps, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion 45/ — had its cumulative impact. It 

was felt not simply in the steady growth of the Ku Klux Klan, nor even in the 

anti-immigration legislation of 1921 and 1924 which closed America’s doors to 

the fugitives of southeastern Europe; it was felt, too, in the adoption of nationwide 

Jewish “quotas” by colleges and professional societies... Eventually 

employment agencies and large corporations adopted the same practice. Soon the 

exclusionist policy was extended to the field of housing. Though voluntary 

covenants of real-estate owners, large areas of many cities were abruptly closed to 

persons of “Hebrew descent.” 46/ 

Part 8. 

THE PROTOCOLS IN PRE-SOVIET RUSSIA 

It is alleged that for some time, The Protocols were used only in Russia. It had little 

influence even there and none at all outside Russia. Its world wide fame began with the Jewish 

Bolshevik (“Russian”) Revolution of 1917. During those tremendous “civil wars” between 1918 

and 1921 involving the rebellious “Red Russians” 47/ versus the incumbent “White Russians,” 48/ 

45 THE PROTOCOLS, as a title. Here, we see a name which differs form that of other titles, such 

as “the Wise Men of Zion.” Even the Jewish historians and chroniclers have not been able to 

decide which title should be used for this Protocols Document. However, the phrase “learned 

elders” appears in The Protocols at 1.26, 5.6, 15.4, 15.8, 24.2, 24.6, 24.11, and therefore is 

persuasive evidence of the more accurate title. (Ed.). 

46 PERSONS OF HEBREW DESCENT. Here again, is the subtle Jewish mis-information and 

dis-information program enforced in books designed for Jewish student consumption, designed 

to lead the student to a conclusion — without mentioning that wrongfull conclusion: that the 

Jews, not the true Israelites, really should be considered as the only “Hebrew” people. The 

opposite is true: the White, Caucasian peoples of today are those Chosen People, and by their 

overall conduct , this fact is made evident and true. That, however, is another ‘long story’ to be 

happily told at another time. 

Further, here is a Jewish complaint that the non-Jews — recognizing the risks in a 

“tolerance” of Jewish presence — are acting in their own non-Jewish self-defense to protect their 

property and lives, using the very same “legal” means that the Jews now use to bind non-Jews to 

the “tolerance” of all that destroys the non-Jewish life. (Ed.). 

47 THE “RED RUSSIANS.” he Communists were known as “Reds,” probably because of their 

“flag” color, with the hammer-&-sickle. They were at first the “Russian Social Democratic 

Labor party,” then the “Communist Party.” The peasants believed they would lose their lands to 

their old landlords if the “Whites” won, so they supported the “Reds.” Compared to the “White” 

Russians, the Reds “were successful because of their effective organization, their appeal to the 

people, their willingness to act, and the clever leadership of Lenin.” World Book Encycl., (1973) 

Vol 16-Q-R (1973), p. 522; id., Vol 4. Ci-Cz, p. 725. See n. WHITE RUSSIANS. 

48 THE “WHITE RUSSIANS.” The poorly organized anti-Communists were called the 

“Whites.” They were very sparsely helped by military assistance from France, Great Britain, the 

United State, and Japan — an old Russian enemy; the First World War was just ending, and 

none but the Reds desired another war. “The aid probably did the Communists more good than 

harm.” World Book Encycl. (1973), Vol 16 Q-R, p. 522-23, because of intense Jewish presence 

in those governments. See: n. RED RUSSIANS. 



the leaders of the White Russians used The Protocols extensively to persuade the Russian people 

that the so-called “revolution” was no more than the execution of a minority Jewish plot to 

impose a Jewish government upon the majority Russian people, the rebellion being only another 

step toward the ultimate aim of a Jewish dominion of the world. 49/ 

The Protocols and the doctrines, which were used to expose or explain current events, 

had their effect in the brutal massacres of Jews during these Russian civil wars; 50/ however, 

whenever anyone as a combatant is killed in a war they ultimately lose, these are often alleged 

by their survivors as being innocent bystanders. 

During this same time, the White Russian agents carried The Protocols into all the countries of 

Europe and North and South America, as evidence of the significance of the Bolshevik 

revolution in Russia, and the nature of the new government which forced its way into power in 

Moscow. In this effort, it is said the White Russians achieved “quite extraordinary success.” 51/ 

In England, the London Times and the Morning Post (to which Mr. Nilus reported) gave The 

Protocols extensive reports, and The Spectator (until recently a long-published 

newspaper/magazine) even demanded a royal commission to decide whether the British Jews 

were in fact “subjects of a secret government.” 52/ 

However, if the Jews had such control over British finance and etc., as economic history 

shows they did, then surely the Jews had sufficient editorial control over some of these 

newspapers that by this time such a demand for a British royal inquiry could be a smokescreen to 

demand what the demandants already know — and have carefully covered up: the Jews were in 

fact ultimately subject to some other government — a Jewish world government and that The 

Protocols were an (un)official guideline for that Jewish government’s agenda — leaked out by 

whomever for whatever reason. 

The antagonists working against The Protocols suggest that from this time onward only 

in the English-speaking world were The Protocols confined to “the lunatic fringe,” but in 

Germany under the National Socialists, this document became allegedly a major theme in Nazi 

anti-Semitic propaganda, and in imitation of the White Russians, described above, “the Nazi 

peddlers of anti-Semitism were instrumental in distributing The Protocols all over the world.” 53/ 

49 ULTIMATE AIM OF A JEWISH DOMINION. See: Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, p. 108. 

50 MASSACRES OF JEWS. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, at 109. Also called “pogroms.” 

51 EXTRAORDINARY SUCCESS. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. 4, “Anti-Semites,” p. 

109. 

52 JEWS AS SUBJECTS OF A SECRET GOVERNMENT. Lewis, Semites &Anti-Semites, p. 

109. 

53 THE NAZI PEDDLERS OF ANTI-SEMITISM. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, p. 109. 

It seems that if the Jews have nothing else to say — or they are caught in a truth, one 

sarcastic “Semitic” reference to a “Nazi (something)” will turn the attention of the listener/reader 

away from Jewish-vacancy, towards remembrances of Nazi Germany, cruel people, and war 

movies, violent as is possible, with scripts written by Jews, produced by Jews, directed by Jews, 

and often acted by Jews — who, to their everlasting Jewish delight, get to `kill goy Germans’ 

and `play dead goy Germans.’ Surely, if there is such a thing as “anti-Semitism” — which there 

is — the Jews practice, on a “global” basis and with impunity to this date though not much 

further, a societaly acceptable form of prejudice and race-hatred greater than any put against the 

Jews, which we label: “anti-Teuton,” “anti-Anglo,” “anti-Saxon,” anti-Germanic,’ etc. By doing 



Part 9. 

CLAIMS OF “FORGERY” DISPROVED — AND, DISMISSED 

The claim of the Jews that The Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their 

genuineness, 54/ for they never attempt to answer the facts corresponding to the threats, the intent, 

and/or the plans which The Protocols contain, reveal, or discuss; nor do the Jews deny the 

correspondence between its prophesy and its (to this date, partial) fulfillment, which are too 

glaring and to obvious to be set aside or obscured by obfuscation of The Adversary. 

The Jewish people, their leaders and writers and journals, of course, say that the 

uncontrolled editions of The Protocols circulating about are a “forgery,” 55/ leaving the unsaid to 

be understood, by people who are easily directed, that Mr. Nilus had concocted them for his own 

— and unexplained — purposes. 56/ If it is true that “uncontrolled editions” are forgeries, then 

logic will determine that there are “originals” which are not forgeries. 

Even the Jewish encyclopedias themselves describe The Protocols in their semi-official 

publications as an “anti-Semitic forgery aimed at showing the existence of international Jewish 

aspirations bent on world power.” 57/ 

The uniqueness of the claim of “forgery” is that such an accusation is almost a uniform 

response by the opponents (or by the true author(s)) of The Protocols. Almost without fail, any 

Jewish-oriented publication that references The Protocols will also include the comment that the 

document is a “forgery,” although a few will say it is “spurious,” or the like. Let it be 

understood that a “forgery” is not a falsehood. 

For a painting or photograph, being one of great value, to be declared a forgery, it must at 

first be so convincingly thought to me made by that famous painter it purported to be by, that the 

exactness of its detail, and the setting, the back- and fore-ground, the shading and brushstrokes, 

etc., must be so convincing to the viewer that it could in fact be an accurate representation of the 

“picture” of the objects, scenes, or individuals painted; so that, even if a fake, that painting or 

photograph was an accurate representation or the original, nonetheless — no additions, no 

deletions, no misrepresentations of the image of painting or photograph itself; only the painter, 

or the author, not being the original one, would be in question. 

so, the Germanic peoples would never know of that Jewish prejudice, and therefore would never 

be free of whatever was the past; nor can the Jew, at that rate. (Ed.). 

54 AN ADMISSION OF THEIR GENUINESS. Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, (London, Hurst & 

Blackett, Ltd., 1942, James Murphy, Translator), Book I, In Retrospect, Chp. XI, “Race & 

People,” p. 174. 

55 UNCONTROLLED EDITIONS OF THE PROTOCOLS ARE A “FORGERY.” “With groans 

and moans, [the Jewish press] repeats again and again that these are forgeries.” Adolph Hitler, 

Mein Kampf, (London, Hurst & Blackett, Ltd., 1942, James Murphy, Translator), Book I, In 

Retrospect, Chp. XI, “Race & People,” p. 174. 

56 MR. NILUS HAD CONCOCTED THEM FOR HIS OWN. [Source, cite, needed]. 

57 FORGERY CLAIMS IN JEWISH ENCYCL. See, i.e., Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, p. 581- 

83 (1971 ed.); The New Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 127-28 (1962). 



Part 10. 

ALLEGED “PROOF” OF FORGERY 

In 1921, the London Times published some articles received from its Istanbul [formerly, 

Constantinople, Turkey] correspondent, who had discovered a copy of the original French 

Protocols pamphlet, and in this manner it is suggested by Jewish writers that The Protocols were 

exposed as a forgery. According to one Jewish writer, 

“Anis Mansur, an Egyptian journalist specializing in reporting on anti-Jewish 

polemics, has his own way of explaining the discoveries of the Times 

correspondent”: Ànti Semitism reached its peak with the publication of the secret 

plan to rule the world. The Times correspondent in Istanbul revealed in 1929 that 

the Jews had composed a book called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, when 

their first Zionist Congress met in Bâle [Basel] in Switzerland, and that at this 

Congress they had agreed on their devilish plan to rule the whole world. This 

book was translated in all the countries of the world. It was translated four times 

in Egypt, and I myself was the first to draw attention to it and translate parts of it 

25 years ago [i.e., in the early 1950’s].’” 58/ 

Mr. Lewis, author of Semites & Anti-Semites, id., states that Mr. Mansur is “wrong in 

every particular. The achievement of Philip Graves, the Times correspondent in Istanbul, was 

not to `reveal’ the Protocols, which were already widely circulated at the time, but to expose 

them as a forgery. The year was not 1929 but 1921.” Mr. Mansur’s claim to be the first to draw 

attention to them in the Arab lands is unfounded, according to Mr. Lewis; Arabic translations 

appeared in Palestine in 1926 and in Egypt in about 1927. 59/ Philip Grave’s Times articles have 

been reprinted in his book titled The Truth about The Protocols, London, 1921. This Compiler & 

Editor has not seen Mr. Grave’s book, for confirmation of any facts alleged therein. 

Mr. Lewis further informs The Reader, by journalistic complaint, that Mr. Mansur is also 

the author of The Wailing Wall and the Tears, “which has run through many editions, repeating 

all the standard accusations of Nazi anti-Semitism, and adding a few words of his own,” i.e., 

“that Jews are instructed by the Talmud to have all other religions and are told they are free to 

commit any crime or offense against the followers of other religions.” 60/ 

58 ANIS MANSUR, EGYPTIAN CORRESPONDENT’S DISCOVERY. Lewis, Semites & Anti- 

Semites, p. 109, n. 38 1, quoting Mansur, Wajc fi qalb Isra il, Cairo, 1977, at p. 140. 

59 ARABIC TRANSLATIONS APPEARED IN PALESTINE. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, 

at Notes. p. 265, n. 38, 2. 

60 

JEWS ARE INSTRUCTED BY THE TALMUD. Lewis, id., at p. 216. Consider also, 

Talmud,.... 



Mr. Mansur writes in his book, citing occasionally from Canon Rohling’s Talmud Jew 61/ 

as well as The Protocols, 62/ commenting upon that very unusual though perceptive, etherial 

presence non-Jews get when in the personal or business proximity of practicing Jews: 

“[S]windling a non-Jew is not a swindle but is an obligation since the Jew regards 

all money in the pocket of any other person as being his [the Jew’s] of right, and 

taking possession of this money amounts to recovering it, and such recovery by 

any means is a lawful act [according to Jewish/talmudic law]. Therefore stealing 

from a Muslim [or, in the case of The Reader, from a Christian or other non-Jew] 

is not stealing and the only theft is theft from another Jew....The immorality 

which the Jews direct in Europe and America and which they were the first to 

introduced in an organized form when they entered the Land of Canaan coming 

from Iraq is not considered a moral or social crime, because it is the duty of the 

Jew to rape women of other religions. Similarly when a Jewish girl gives herself 

to a Muslim or a Christian, this is not considered a kind of fornication, since 

fornication can only take place between human and human, and the Jews regard 

anyone other than themselves as animals. Therefore there is no moral crime [if a 

Jew commits an act] between an “animal” and a “human.” 63/ 

[THE WORLD HATES THE JEW BECAUSE THE JEW HATES THE WORLD.] 

Martin Luther, the Reformer, plainly makes his comments on the Jews taking advantage 

of “basic honesty of Anglo Saxon ways.” 64/ 

Part 11. 

SOME OTHERS INVOLVED WHO ARE 

SUGGESTED AS PROMOTING “ANTI-SEMITISM” 

It seems not even the Jewish historians can get it right, but it all depends on perspective 

and intent. To make it appear so unlikely that it would be ignored by “broad-minded” people 65/ 

61 ROHLING’s Talmud Jew (Der Talmudjude). Canon August Rohling, nineteenth century 

professor at the Imperial University of Prague. “The numerous misrepresentations and 

falsifications in his book were at once challenged and disproved, not only by Jewish but also by 

Christian scholars...His forced resignation encouraged the book’s enormous success.” See: 

Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. 4, “Anti-Semites,” p. 106. 

62 MR. MANSUR, CITING OCCASIONALLY FROM. Mr. Mansur refers to he Protocols as 

“the secret constitution of the Jews.”, and it “advises Jews to become obstetricians and to 

specialize in abortion, which in fact they do in all the world and which they used to do in 

Egypt...the reason for this is that abortion is a means to reduce the number of non-Jews — one 

thousand, and a hundred thousand.” Lewis, id., p. 217, at n. 23, quoting Mansur, Al-Ha it wa `ldumu 

c (Cairo, 1972), pp. 15 ff. 

63 QUOTES FROM THE WAILING WALL AND THE TEARS, MR. MANSUR. Lewis, Semites 

& Anti-Semites, Chp. 8, “The War Against the Jews,” p. 216. With a Jewish attitude like that, 

why should the world not war against such a twisted idea? THE WORLD HATES THE JEW 

BECAUSE THE JEW HATES THE WORLD. Therefore, it does war against them. (Ed.). 

64 HONEST ANGLO SAXON WAYS. Luther’s Works, Vol 47, “The Christian in Society,” 

(Part 4) “On the Jews and Their Lies.” 

65 BROADMINDED PEOPLE. See, for example: Ford, Int’l Jew., Vol. I, “The World’s 

Foremost Problem,” Chp. XIII, “`Jewish’ Plan to Split Society by Ideas,” p. 150; Dearborn 



of supposed “common sense” — until it is too late — is the best way; but if that wasn’t work, the 

more confusing for The Adversary, the better: “the Jews have always counted confidently on the 

fact that if the whole truth were told in one comprehensive utterance, no one would believe it.” 66/ 

Jewish writers have said: “The Protocols [are] actually a compilation of various anti- 

Semitic writings from the late nineteenth century, claiming to be a record of a conclave of 

Jewish leaders from throughout the world who met in Switzerland sometime around the 

seventeenth century. During this meeting their leaders plotted to take over the world and destroy 

all other religions. The “Protocols” were collected and published in one volume by the Czar’s 

secret police and used to justify pogroms against Jews.” 67/ Another Jewish Historian says “Czar 

Nicholas II commissioned Nilus, a monk, to come up with something damming to the Jews.” 68/ 

“Henry Ford began publishing the Dearborn Independent, a newspaper that 

printed every conceivable staple of contemporary anti-Semitism, including the 

Protocols of the learned Elders of Zion. The hate that filled the columns of the 

Independent was some of the most vile anti-Semitism ever to be published in this 

country [America]. Ford himself was forthright about the purpose of his little 

newspaper, claiming that Bolsheviks and Jews were the two main threats to the 

United States, and he was embarked upon a crusade to rid the country of them 

both. In his view, “Jewish power” attacked the American economy from above 

through the Rothschilds, while Marx and Trotsky subverted it from below, all at 

the behest of the ìnternational Jew.’ Henry Ford and his anti-Semitic hate-sheet 

illustrated that point perfectly: one of his friends was Rabbi Leo Franklin, who 

puzzled Ford by refusing to join in his `crusade against the international Jew.’” 69/ 

During the 1930’s, “the infamous Coughlin [New York City’s Father Charles Coughlin] 

called for a `Christian front’ that would not fear being called anti-Semitic “because...the term 

anti-Semitic is only a pat phrase in Communism’s glossary of attacks.” He went on to say that 

the authenticity of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was irrelevant, since `We cannot 

ignore the news value of their strongly prophetic nature.’” at p. 37. And, in the 1940’s, 

Congressman Hamilton Fish of New York allowed the “Silver Shirts” (a neo-fascist American 

anti-Semitic organization), to distribute copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

under his congressional frank (or, postage-free mailings to constituents), plus pamphlets about 

“Fight For Freedom” (which was a prominent pre-World War II interventionist group), calling it 

Independent, August 14, 1920. Mr. Ford encourages us many times in his Works to have that 

“straight and narrow” mind, to keep within the limits of good moral behavior. Ford, Int’l Jew. 

66 

NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE IT. See: Ford, The Int’l Jew, Vol. III, “Jewish Influences in 

American Life,” Chp. LX, “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 167; Dearborn 

Independent, May 14, 1921. 

67 

POGROMS AGAINST THE JEWS. Ernest Wolkman, A Legacy of Hate: Anti-Semitism in 

America (New York, Franklin Watts, Pub., 1982), p. 10, at footnote. 

68 CZAR NICHOLAS II COMMISSIONED NILUS, A MONK. Max I. Dimont, Jews, God, and 

History (New York, Signet/Times Mirror, 1962), p. 321. No sources are given, but Mr. Dimont 

says it “is so fantastic that the truth itself is hardly believable.” id., at 321. Does this mean to say: 

Ìt is true, but....’. (Ed.). 

69 

CRUSADE AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL JEW. Wolkman, A Legacy of Hate at p. 32- 

33. 



“The Fight for Jewdom.” When questioned about it, Fish is reported to have replied, “It doesn’t 

bother me any...There’s been too much Jewism going around anyway.” 70/ 

Adolph Hitler is frequently quoted as saying: “If the Jew did not exist, we would have to 

invent him,” as part of the German idea of Schlagwort, which in English would be “slogan,” 

except the nearest it can be literally translated into English is: “hitting words.” 71/ 

It is also believed by some people that it was the Eastern Christians who had introduced 

anti-Semitism (and presumably later, The Protocols) to the Middle East, because “they [Arabs] 

had an easier access to Western literature but not enough judgment to exercise critical and 

discriminating choice.’”. 72/ And yet, Mr. Lewis fails to produce any evidence to counter his — 

or anyone elses’ — claim of The Protocols being a “forgery,” other than to refer to someone 

elses’ “evidence.” 

The Protocols, however successful they are believed to be, were not known in the early 

days of the American Republic, when in a speech at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, 

Benjamin Franklin is alleged to have urged the Founding Fathers not to admit Jews into the new 

republic, and warned them of the dire consequences if they disregarded his words. 73/ Of course, 

this speech is said to be a “total fabrication, but was not without its effect.” 74/ 

The Protocols have been “repeatedly condemned in the Christian world...as a fake,” 

[Lewis, 199] but by whom it is not mentioned. A “fake,” of course, is “a counterfeit or 

imitation,” 75/ implying the image presented is otherwise true except for its not being authorized 

by the writer(s) thereof, like a “forgery” would be. 

Part 12. 

FORGERY, DEFINED BY “LAW.” 

In Law, a forgery is “the false making or material altering, with intent to defraud, of any 

writing [for example] which, of genuine, might apparently be of legal efficacy [or, legal effect] 

or the foundation of a legal liability.” 76/ Without that premise or motive, there is no forgery. A 

70 

THERE’S BEEN TOO MUCH JEWISM GOING AROUND ANYWAY. Wolkman, A 

Legacy of Hate at p. 42, 132. 

71 SCHLAGWORT, AS “HITTING WORD.” See, Leonard Baker, Days of Sorrow and Pain: 

Leo Baeck and The Berlin Jews, Chp. 7, “The Enemy,” p. 136. 

72 ARAB ACCESS — BUT NOT JUDGMENT. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, at Notes. p. 

265, n. 38, 3. That should be considered an “anti-Arabic” prejudice; there is no evidence that a 

peoples who survived as long as the Arabs have, are lacking “judgment.” Only a “superior race” 

thinks that. (Ed.). 

73 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN. Said to be in the notes of the Convention by delegate Charles 

Pickney of South Carolina. 

74 TOTAL FABRICATION, NOT WITHOUT ITS EFFECT.” Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, p. 

109. 

75 

FAKE: A COUNTERFEIT OR IMITATION. Webst.Int’l.Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 912. 

76 FORGERY, DEFINED. Black’s Law Dict., 4th ed. Rev., (1968) p. 779. 



copy of the original, which is ascribed to its author is not a “forgery;” it could be considered an 

“unauthorized” reproduction of it, but not an offense. The words are true, the author is correctly 

named, but simply not permitted to be published by whomever printed and/or circulated the 

document. 

In Jewish religious law, it is said that: “Since the essential characteristic of a forgery is its 

intent to deceive,... forgery of documents is not, either in biblical or in talmudic law, a criminal 

offense...None the less, it is a recognized evil which the law is called upon to prevent.” 77/ 

Therefore, if there is no intent to deceive when publishing what is known as the most accurate 

and truthful representation of a document — i.e., if that document is complained of not as being 

inaccurate or deceptive but merely an unauthorized reproduction of the undisclosed original, 

there is no cause for Jews or non-Jews to take offense at this non-offense; and, there is no cause 

for the laws of Jews or non-Jews to litigate nor to protect. 

It should be noted that apparently in all forms of “law,” a “forgery” is not a “fake” nor 

“false.” A forgery, in this sense, is an accurate though unauthorized or unapproved reproduction 

or facsimile of the original — a false making; and unless objected to, could be assumed to be a 

correct representation of the original which it seeks to display. “Forgery” does not necessarily 

mean a fabrication of evidence or a deceitful arrangement of the facts designed to create an 

erroneous impression of a false inference in the minds of those who may observe them. A 

forgery could also be considered a “counterfeit,” and would of necessity be such that it had in its 

content every detail necessary to convince those familiar with it that the “forgery” was similar 

and convincing enough as to be offered as an accurate copy or imitation without authority or 

right, by passing the copy or thing forged on to others, who would believe it to be an original, or 

genuine, or at least a copy based upon the details of the original. It has never been seen by this 

present editor that The Protocols were ever decried as anything else but a “forgery” or some 

other evasive phraseology tending to avoid answering The Question: Are The Protocols true?’ 

This lends to the understanding that The Protocols herein presented are nothing more than an 

unauthorized though accurate rendering of a true document, which truly describes historical 

plans of someone, and which plans we see unfolding before our very eyes. 

Part 13. 

WILLFUL MISLEADING OF THE UNKNOWING “GENTILES” 

To throw fuel on the flames, ignorance and emotional zeal with unsupported assertions, 

which would not withstand a moment in a court-of-law, are thrown on to the matter with no 

regard for factual evidence in support. At the San Bernardino (California) Public Library, 78/ a 

77 JEWISH LAW REGARDING FORGERY. The Jewish Encycl., Vol 6 (Di-Do), p. 1431-32. 

78 SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC LIBRARY. Coincidently, that library is named as a memorial 

to Norman F. Feldheym (1906-1985), a local commune-unity leader. (Ed.). In the county of San 

Diego, where The Compiler & Editor of This Book lives, many if not most public judicial 

“government” buildings are named after Jews. This ordinarily would not be objectionable, until 

one observes that San Diego, in the 1990’s, had become a very Jewish-oriented city. Few other 

races or ethnic origins are as “represented” in the places and names of power & control. This 

bodes poorly for the Jew. (Ed.). 



book-search, using the name The Protocols of the Learned Elders (or, Wise Men) of Zion in the 

library’s computerized card catalogue, showed nothing there relating to that title. Finally, as a 

result of a search under the “Protocols of Zion,” only one entry for a popular magazine was 

found. True to form, that entry states, in an unofficial summary, that The Protocols of Zion was 

to “detail a supposed conspiracy among Jews to conquer the world. Its publication had incited a 

wave of anti-Semitism...and caused the death of millions before it was uncovered to be a 

fraud.” 79/ Nothing further in that summary is offered as evidence to establish the truth of that 

suggestion, and the summary disregards the fact that The Protocols, under whatever title, have 

been denied by Jews, and alleged to have been uncovered as a fraud by Jews, long before any 

`death of millions’ or the so-called “holocaust” in the Europe of the 1940’s. 

The Jews remain steadfast at denying The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as a 

“forgery,” etc., saying “Careful and documented exposures of its fraudulent origin behave 

relegated it, in the free world, to the lunatic fringes, but have done little to diminish its 

effectiveness elsewhere. Because of its enormous impact, and the actions taken by those who 

believe in it, it has been accurately described as à warrant for genocide.’” 80/ If unenlightened 

Readers would believe anything in print at the truth, The Adversary will have its way. 

All this the Jews well know and therefore evade in their peculiar and characteristic 

manner — by putting up a strong offense against their supposed attackers (more rightly, 

revelators) to protect their own un-defendable position, rather than to debate the truth of the 

matter. 

If The Protocols are “forgeries,” as most Jews assert, then it surely is a paradox that 

everything which those documents outline should be now coming to pass as existent, right before 

our very eyes. Henry Ford, quoted above, was right: “[The Protocols] have fitted the world 

situation up to this time. They fit now.” 

Part 14. 

THE “PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS.” 

The presumption is strong that The Protocols were issued, or reissued, at the First Zionist 

Congress held at Basel, Switzerland, 81/ on August 27, 1897, for three days, 82/ with 204 

“delegates” form “all corners of the world,” including 80 from Russia — over one-third of them 

79 

LIBRARY CATALOGUE CITE. From an Abstract, Summary of an article, “This Lie will not 

Die,” by Lawrence Elliot, Reader’s Digest (Canada), Vol. 146, June, 1995, p. 57. 

80 

“A WARRANT FOR GENOCIDE.” Bernard Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, (1986 W.W. 

Norton & Co., New York) p. 23 at n. 8, quoting Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide: The Myth 

of the Jewish World-Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, (London, 1967). 

81 FIRST ZIONIST CONGRESS HELD AT BASEL, SWITZERLAND. “It had been intended 

to hold the First Congress in Munich [Germany]. That it met in Basel was due to the opposition 

of the official Jewish community in the first-named city [Munich].” Gottheil, Zionism, Chp. V., 

“The Jewish Congress,” p. 113. 

82 

FIRST ZIONIST CONGRESS HELD IN AUGUST, 1897. Gottheil, id, Chp. V., “The Jewish 

Congress,” p. 114; Sachar, p. 272. 



all, 83/ assembling under the presidency of the Father of Modern Zionism, the late Theodore 

Herzl. 

There has been published a volume of Herzl’s Diaries, a translation of some passages 

which appeared in The Jewish Chronicle of July 14, 1922, 84/ though unseen by the Compiler and 

Editor of This Book. In that diary, Herzl gives an account of his first visit to England in 1895, 

and his conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a Christian, and an officer in 

the English Army, and at hear a Jew Nationalist throughout all that time. Goldsmid suggested to 

Herzl that the best way of expropriating the English aristocracy and so destroying their power to 

protect the people of England against Jewish infiltration and eventual domination, was to put an 

excessive tax upon the land. Herzl thought this to be an excellent idea, and it is now found 

definitely embodied in “Protocol No. 4.” 

The above extract from Herzl’s Diary, if the Reader could ever find a copy of it — which 

is doubtful anymore, is an extremely significant piece of evidence hearing on the existence of the 

Jewish World Plot and on the authenticity of The Protocols prior to the Nilus translation and its 

subsequent proliferation. But any reader of intelligence will be able, from his own knowledge of 

the history of this century and from his own experience, to confirm the genuineness of every line 

of Herzl’s statements, and of those protocols; and, it is in the light of this living comment that all 

readers are invited to study Mr. Nilus’ or Mr. Marsden’s translation of that document. 

And here is another very significant circumstance. One of the successors of Theodore 

Herzl as leader of the Zionist Movement, a Dr. Weizmann, quoted ont of these sayings at the 

send-off banquet given to Chief Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the 

point of leaving for his “Empire tour” of Jewish places — a Jewish answer to the British 

Commonwealth “Empire Tour” of the English royalty. And this is the “saying” of The Sages 

which Dr. Weizmann quoted: 

“A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He 

[God] has dispersed him [the Jew] all over the world.” 85/ 

Now compare Dr. Weizmann’s quotation with the last sentence of Protocol No. 11, 

paragraph 8: 

God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, 

which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has cone forth all our strength, 

which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world. 

The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several things. It proves 

that some kind of assembly, calling themselves — or referred to by others — as “The elders,” or 

“the Learned Elders,” or, “The Wise Men,” do in fact exist. It indicates that Dr. Weizmann, and 

all to whom he spoke at that meeting, knew or should have known all about them. It proves that 

the desire for a “National Home” in Palestine (now called the Jewish State of Israel) is only 

camouflage and an infinitesimal part of the Jew’s real, ultimate object. It proves that the 

83 “ALL CORNERS OF THE WORLD.” Sachar, id. p. 272. 

84 JEWISH CHRONICLE. The Jewish Chronicle, DATES.... 

85 “A BENEFICENT PROTECTION.” See, The Jewish Guardian, October 8, 1920. 



international Jews of the world have no intention of settling quietly and peacefully in Palestine, 

Israel, or any separate country; and that, their annual prayer — that they may all meet “Next 

Year in Jerusalem” — is merely a small piece of their larger characteristic make-believe put 

forth for gentile (goyim) consumption. It demonstrates that the Jews who follow these Protocols 

are now a world menace, and that the non-Jewish races and nations will have to domicile these 

Jews permanently out of their lands and into the modern-day — and falsely and Jewishly labeled 

nation of “Israel.” Let that nation be renamed “Zion,” as it should be. Let the Jew suffer there in 

the presence, and at the hand, of his own kind, and in close quarters. Let them remain there, with 

no traveling abroad to other lands. Make “Zion” their prison, and let no other peoples interfere 

with the result of the Jews’ own blood. 

Part 15. 

THE TERM “THE (LEARNED) ELDERS” DEFINED 

During what is commonly referred to as the “biblical” times, an “elder” was a member of 

the authoritative group of the nation. 86/ 

The elders were influential in the shaping the form of government and served as judges 

and chief representatives of the people, up to the period of the rabbinical “Second Temple.” 87/ 

In Israel, as it was among many other ancient nations and peoples, an elder was usually a 

person of advanced age, but it also would be a title of someone of distinct social status or grade. 

The elders were the consulting body for the village or town or city, or nation; and as such these 

elders were considered — by themselves or by others — as “the wise.” There were the elders of 

the people; elders of an area; or, of a tribe, of the Diaspora, of the priests, of the city, of the 

house (whether home or palace), etc. The most common use of the term “the elders” applies to 

the elders of the people of the “government”: nation, or village/ town/city. 88/ 

If the text of this Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion document is accurately and 

truthfully represented — even if it is a “forgery,” as alleged, this phrase, “our learned elders,” 

supports the contention of its Translators and publishers that some upper or higher deliberative 

body or group exists which exceeds the existence and authority or power of the alleged, 

unknown speaker, and/or exceeds that of the lesser deliberative body to whom the speaker is 

apparently addressing his Protocols speech. (Ed.). 

Referring indirectly to the rabbinical “Tradition of the Elders,” which often conflicts with 

the “laws” of the Old and New Testaments and which most definitely conflicts fatally with 

Christianity as it should be — and must be — practiced, as seen in the following “Commentary” 

by The Compiler and Editor of This Book. 

86 NATION. For its definition of “elders.” the Standard Jewish Encycl., at p. 611, does not 

designate the “nation” to which it refers — whether the nation of Jewry or of the nation (House) 

of true Israel. (Ed.). 

87 JUDGES AND CHIEF REPRESENTATIVES: VARIATIONS OF ELDERS. Encyc. Jud., 6, 

at p. 578 

88 THE WISE. See Encyc. Jud., Vol. 6, p. 578. 



Part 16. 

WHO ARE “THE ELDERS”? 

(Derived From mostly Jewish Sources) 

Concerning exactly who are “the learned elders” of today or yesterday, that is a secret 

which has not been revealed by those of the Zionist movement. 89/ “The Elders” are popularly 

known as “The Hidden Hand.” They are not the “Board of Deputies” of the Jewish Parliament 

in England; nor are they the “Universal Israelite Alliance” which sits in Paris, France. But the 

late Walter Rathenau of the Allgemeiner Electricaets Gesellschaft (an electric-generating/ 

manufacturing company) has thrown a little light on the subject and doubtless he was in 

possession of their names, being, in all likelihood, one of the chief leaders himself. Writing in 

the Wiener Freie Presse (Viennese Free Press), December 24, 1912, he said: — 

Three thousand men, each of whom knows all the others, govern 

the fate of the European continent, and they elect their own 

successors from their entourage. 90/ 

Historians tell that the year of 1848 was a year of violent revolution in Europe; many 

books have been written that this was the well-planned result of Marxist/Engels inspired Jewish 

revolutionaries and their infiltration and agitation against the many monarchies of Europe. In 

fact, more than one king had complained that it was the work of foreigners that resulted in such 

turmoil. 91/ In the year 1844, near the start of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, a very important 

and decisive year for European nations and their national relatives, Benjamin Disraeli, whose 

real name was Israel, and who was a “damped,” or baptized Jew, published his novel, 

Coningsby. 92/ In his book, there occurs this ominous passage: — 

89 EXACTLY WHO ARE “THE LEARNED ELDERS.” “A [Nilus] group of conspiratorial 

Jews known as the Elders of Zion.” Max Dimont, Jews, God, & History, id., at 322. “That the 

Jews were the revolutionaries par excellence, the masterminds of the Bolshevik Revolution — 

that was nothing new.” Davidowicz, The War Against the Jews, p. 26. 

90 VIENNESE FREE PRESS. [text and cite needed]. 

91 REVOLUTION THE WORK OF FOREIGNERS. The opinion of King Frederick William IV, 

King of Prussia. 1848: The Revolutionary Tide in Europe, Stearns, at p. 147. 

92 CONINGSBY, THE BOOK. Coningsby, or The New Generation, The English Comedie 

Humaine, by Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield (1804-1881). British prime minister and 

author of several books. Coningsby was first published in 1844. Cited edition, published New 

York, The Century Co., 1902 ed. See also, S.D.Pub.Lib. ed. 



The world is governed by very different personages from what is 

imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. 93/ 

And he (Disraeli) went on to show that these personage were all Jews. But Coningsby is 

only a “novel,” a fictional work, and — in no jest meant at all, who would believe a fictional 

work as reflecting the truth? Often, that is the only way to get past the “censors.” 

Now that Divine Providence, Almighty God — The Searcher of Hearts, has brought to 

the light of day these secret Protocols, all men and women may clearly see the hidden 

personages specified by Disraeli at work “behind the scenes” of all the Governments supposed to 

be in the non-Jewish lands. This revelation imposes upon all Christian peoples the grave 

responsibilities of examining and revising entirely their attitude towards The Race of the Jews 

and The Nation of the Jews and The Religion of the Jews which boasts of its survival and 

domination over all Empires, Nations, Religions, and Peoples, regardless of, and to the 

destruction of, any Race, Nation or Religion. 

In The Holy Bible, King James Version, generally, an “Elder” (sometimes: zaken) in the 

Jewish understanding, is “one who has acquired wisdom”; one of several “elders of the people” 

(compare: Num. 22:4, :7); or, of a particular area (Judges 11:5-11); of a tribe (Duet. 31:28); of 

the Diaspora 94/ (Jer. 29:1); of the priests (II Kings 19:2, Jer. 19:1); of the city, called a “passim,” 

a ??; and/or of the “house;” An Elder is a person not always one of advanced age, but is usually 

at a particularly high social class or level, probably holding an upper-level religious, financial, or 

political place. 

“The Elders” are the consulting body of the group being represented by them, and as such 

they are considered “the wise.” The title is reserved for the sages and scholars, and are often 

members of the Sanhedrin, or bet din (“???”); occasionally, the unpaid members of the 

communal leadership on the “Council of the Lands.” It is suggested that it was not accidental 

that the term èlder’ was used by anti-Semites as a horror image of scheming old men...in the 

shape of the Èlders (or Sages) of Zion.’ The Nazis of Germany described them as 

Judenaelteste, or “elders of the Jews.” 95/ 

93 CONINGSBY QUOTE. A statement by the fictional character “Sidonia,” The Jew. Disraeli, 

Id., at p. 250-51. Also, by reference: Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. I, “Jewish Activities in the U.S.,” 

Chp. XXXVII., “Disraeli — British Premier Portrays Jews,” at p. 195. It is somewhat interesting 

to note that when The Compiler and Editor of this Protocols book attempted a second review of 

this copy of Coningsby, to re-search it to find that quote — after he first found it three weeks 

earlier at the local Public Library in May, 1996, the book was for no known reason suddenly 

“withdrawn – permanently removed, from the storage area — and from public access; and, it has 

not been seen there since. It is alleged to still be a “book in print.” (Ed.). 

94 . ELDERS OF THE DIASPORA. The “diaspora” defined..... 

95 JUDENAELTESTE, or “elders of the Jews.” See, Encyc. Jud., (1971 ed.) “Elder,” p. 578-81. 



Part 17. 

WHO WROTE THE PROTOCOLS? 96/ 

The Jews blame Pytor Ivanovich Rachkovsky, the chief of the Czar’s Okhrana, a secret 

police for the existence of The Protocols. They suggest Rachkovsky, acting in the name of the 

Czar, had an anti-semitic motive in doing it, because of the Russian Jewry’s revolution against 

the Czar. 97/ But the most likely author of The Protocols — or perhaps more correctly: the 

speaker of them, regardless of its title, would be Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), considered “the 

father of political Zionism and founder of World Zionist Organization.” 98/ If not Herzl, then a 

deep study of the men involved in early Zionism would discover that person, for Herzl was 

surrounded by men of ambition; but all evidence as yet indicated it was Herzl himself who either 

wrote, or at least spoke, those words written in The Protocols — The Minutes of the Zionist 

meeting. 

The Speaker must have used some form of notes, to “stay on point;” and, such a length of 

speech could not reasonably occur in one half-day or one whole day. In fact, a study of the Text 

indicates that the Speaker mentions at least two or more occasions where he begins the session 

on a different day and/or session, which was thereafter occupied with this matter. The 

complexity, the detail, and the organized manner of presentation, all alludes to some written text, 

which, as is seen, could have been obtained by whatever means, and revealed to the world by 

one recognizing the dangers of what was spoken. 

Herzl was the holder of a doctorate in law and was a writer of plays and fiction, and a 

newspaper reporter, the Paris, France correspondent for the Neus Freie Presse of Vienna, from 

October, 1891 to July, 1895. He wrote his Work based upon a first draft of speeches and 

accumulated notes for Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State) — the establishment of a Jewish 

homeland, compiled in 1895; the speech was also known as an “Address to the Rothschilds,” 

and/or “To the Family Council.” 99/ 

In his diary, Herzl described his Jewish State idea as “a work of infinite grandeur...a 

mighty dream....It is still too early to surmise what will come of it...If my conception is not 

translated into reality, at least my activity can become a novel. Title: The Promised Land! To 

tell the truth, I am no longer sure that it was not actually the novel I first had in mind...Perhaps 

96 WHO WROTE IT? A complete history of Theodor Herzl and his relationship to “Zionism” 

(and possibly as the one who spoke as written in The Protocols of Zion) can be found in the 

respected Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 8, “Herzl, Theodor,” from pp. 407-422. See also, Sources 

noted below. However, this Part could be better drawn, to focus more clearly and accurately 

upon Theodor Herzl as the most likely author of The Protocols of...Zion. (Ed.). 

97 THE JEWS BLAME THE RUSSIAN SECRET POLICE. Levy, A Lie & a Libel, p. xi. 

98 THEODOR HERZL, FATHER OF ZIONISM. Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 8, pp 407. “I have 

said that the summoning of the Congress was the first constructive work (or, policy) attempted 

by Herzl, in 1897, says Richard J.H. Gottheil, Zionism, Chp. IV, “Theodor Herzl, p. 93; and, id., 

Chp. V, “The Jewish Congress,” at p. 108. 

99 FAMILY COUNCIL. The Reader should remember that the word “council” in English 

translates into “soviet” in Russian. See: Nolan, Communism versus the Negro, Chp. “Notes,” p. 

230 at n. 9). 



these ideas are not practical ones at all and I am only making myself the laughingstock of the 

people to whom I talk about it seriously. Could I be only a figure in my novel?” 100/ 

Herzl wrote if his ideas a letter to Baron Maurice de Hirsch, a French Jew who made a 

fortune in banking and was the greatest Jewish philanthropist of the time. 101/ Hirsch met with 

Herzl in the billiards room at Hirsch’s mansion on the rue de l’Elysée, in May of 1895. 102/ Herzl 

admitted his “credentials” were poor: he had not done much in the pro-Jewry field; then, he is 

reported as speaking from his prepared notes on his theory of what we know now as Zionism 

(and eventually, the text for The Protocols) saying: 

For two thousand years of the dispersion the Jews have been without unified 

political leadership. I regard this as our worst misfortune. It has harmed us more 

than all the persecutions. This is why we have inwardly been ruined. There has 

been no one to train us to become real men...We were pushed into all the inferior 

occupations, we were locked up in ghettos where we caused one another’s 

degeneration. And when they let us out, they suddenly expected us to have all the 

characteristics of a people accustomed to freedom. 103/ 

Herzl then spoke of the need to unify the Jewish people. this would be done politically; 

and by offering “`huge prizes’ for striking deeds, for courage, self-sacrifice, ethical conduct, 

achievements in art and science — for anything great. The moral level of the people would be 

raised.” 104/ 

Hirsch said Jews had too many intellectuals, Jews wanted to climb too high in (an 

unnamed) society, and all that brought the misfortune upon themselves. Hirsch was financing a 

new Jewish colony in Argentina, and so doubted the ideas of a Jewish homeland. 105/ Herzl is 

said to have told Hirsch: “You breed beggars. This philanthropy debases the character of our 

people.” 106/ Herzl threatened to go to the German Kaiser: 

100 

“A WORK OF INFINITE GRANDEUR.” Chaim Potok, Wanderings: History of the Jews 

(New York, Alfred A. Knopf, Pub. 1987), Book Four, “Inside Modern Paganism,” Chp. 

“Secularism: Messiahs for a Broken World,” p. 379. 

101 BARON MAURICE DE HIRSCH. Encycl. Jud. id., p. 408; Potok, id., p. 382. 

102 HIRSCH MET WITH HERZL IN MAY OF 1895. Sachar, Course of Jewish History, Chp. 

XIII., “The Rise of Zionism,” “Theodore Herzl,” at p. 269; Potok, id., p. 382 

103 

THE NEED TO UNIFY THE JEWISH PEOPLE. Potok, id., p. 382. 

104 MORAL LEVEL RAISED. Potok, id., p. 382. 

105 

HIRSCH FINANCES A NEW JEWISH COLONY IN ARGENTINA. Sachar, id., p. 269; 

Potok, 382. 

106 

PHILANTHROPY DEBASES THE CHARACTER. Sachar, id., p. 269. At this point in the 

Herzl-Hirsch conversation, Hirsch asked what Herzl planned to do about it. Herzl said he would 

“call a congress of Jewish notables to discuss migration to a sovereign Jewish state. Hirsch 

stated at his guest incredulously for a moment, and then quickly ushered him to the door” — 

apparently because Herzl dared to challenge the Sanhedrin, and “thoughts so shockingly at 

variance with the National Affiliation, the Sanhedrin’s dominating tradition in Western Jewish 

life.” Sachar, id., p. 269. This account differs with Potok, p. 382-83. It seems the Jewish 

“historians” are no more harmonically accurate than any other. See the errors mentioned of 

Benjamin Segel, in this INTRODUCTION. (Ed.). 



“He will understand me, for he has been brought up to be the judge of great 

things...To the Kaiser I will say: Let my people go! We are strangers here; we are 

not permitted to assimilate with the people, nor are we able to do so. Let us go! I 

will tell you the ways and the means which I want to use for our exodus, so that 

no economic crisis or vacuum may follow our departure.” 107/ 

Hirsch asked where the money to pay for all this would come from; Herzl replied he 

would set up a “Jewish National Loan Fund of ten million marks.” After hearing Herzl’s plans, 

Hirsch called it a fantasy, saying, “The rich Jews will give nothing. Wealthy people are mean 

and care nothing about the sufferings of the poor.” 108/ While Hirsch suggested he would sacrifice 

everything, he expected all other Jews to do the same. He promised to meet Herzl again. Herzl 

wrote in his diary, “It is working itself out through me. 109/ It would be an obsession, if it were not 

so rational from beginning to end.” 110/ 

Parts of the address Herzl planned to give were not intended for the general public, only 

for the Rothschilds, playing off his fortunes ill-thought of by the gentile world: it should be made 

to serve a sacred purpose; “to sanctify the Rothschild money by the good it served,” 111/ becoming 

the financial means of an immense migration of Jews to a land of a Jewish State. “We are 

talking about a simple old matter — the exodus from Egypt,” Herzl said to Hirsch. 112/ 

Herzl read his address to a friend, Friedreich Shiff, “an educated Jew, doctor, and 

journalist.” Shiff’s “opinion was that Herzl’s ideas were the result of a nervous breakdown,” and 

declared unhesitatingly that the author was making straight for the madhouse.” 113/ It was an 

opinion which had a profound, depressing effect on Herzl, who complained of the 

“smallmindedness of the Jews,” and writing to Hirsch: “For the present there is no helping the 

Jews. If someone showed them the promised land, they would scoff at him. For they are 

demoralized...We shall have to sink still lower; we shall have to be more widely insulted, spat 

upon, mocked, beaten, robbed and slain before we are ripe for the idea....” 114/ 

During the summer of 1895, Herzl actually met with the Rothschilds in Berlin and 

Munich, and other prominent Jews in Vienna, London, and Paris. (There is no mention of how 

107 TO THE KAISER I WILL SAY. Potok, id., p. 382. 

108 

THE RICH JEWS WILL GIVE NOTHING.. Potok, id., p. 382; Sachar, p. 270. See also, n. 

JEWISH BANKERS REFUSED THEIR SUPPORT, in this Part. 

109 “IT IS WORKING ITSELF OUT THROUGH ME.” Potok, p. 382. 

110 

“RATIONAL FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END.” Encycl. Jud., p. 408; Potok, p. 

384. 

111 

TO SANCTIFY THE ROTHSCHILD MONEY. Encycl. Jud. p. 409; Potok, p. 384. 

112 

A SIMPLE OLD MATTER — THE EXODUS FROM EGYPT. Potok, p. 382. Here we see 

the delusion that the Jews are the only people to accomplish the now famous, historically proven 

exit from ancient Egypt, where the Jews believe themselves — erroneously, through rabbinical 

instruction — to be the “Israelites” mentioned in the Old Testament migration. (Ed.). 

113 STRAIGHT FOR THE MADHOUSE. Richard J.H. Gotthiel, Zionism (Movements in 

Judaism), (Phila., The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1914), Chp. IV., “Theodor Herzl,” 

p. 86; Encycl. Jud., id., p. 409-410; Potok, id., p. 384. 

114 THERE IS NO HELPING THE JEWS. Encycl. Jud., p. 409-410; Potok, p. 384. 



Herzl could afford all this travelling lifestyle — which probably was proportionately more 

expensive then than today). Those Jews listened to Herzl’s two hour speech — they respected 

him because of his reputation as an author and correspondent, but they did not take his plans 

seriously. Hirsch was right: the Jewish bankers refused to support Herzl’s ideas. 115/ 

The Jews of Western Europe mocked him; some of them were horrified by the 

announced project. German and German-Jewish newspapers called him the “Jewish Jules Verne” 

(the writer of fantastic adventure-novels), and accused him of betraying the National 

Affirmation. 116/ Herzl’s Diary reads: “Today, I am an isolated and lonely man, tomorrow 

perhaps the intellectual leader of hundreds of thousands.” 117/ But the Jews of Eastern Europe — 

distinctly different, believed. 118/ 

Arriving at more complex ideas for his plans, these ideas he put into book form while in 

Paris in 1895, published under the name Judenstaat — Jewish State, in Vienna in February, 

1896, into eventually 18 languages and eighty separate editions. 119/ The Work was described as 

“the cool reasoning of the philosopher...cool pronouncements that captured the mind rather than 

transported the imagination; Autoemancipation, the cry of the hunted stag that pants after some 

haven of refuge.” 120/ Pinsker’s pre-Herzl writings, which provided a basis for The Jewish State 

idea, said, in Gottheil’s words: 

The root of the evil from which the Jews are suffering he finds to be the fact that, 

since the destruction of Jerusalem, the various peoples and rulers have ever had to 

deal with the Jews as a nation, but only with individual settlements of Jews. The 

blame for this lies primarily at the door of the Jews themselves. They have not 

only never felt the necessity for national concentration, but, on the contrary, have 

actively denied that necessity. The consequence has been that, having attempted 

to commit national suicide, they have been taken at their word, have been 

regarded as a dead nation — and treated as such. They have walked the earth as a 

ghost, and as all ghosts do, have inspired fear and dislike. In addition, Jews have 

suffered from being strangers in a double sense: strangers in the lands to which 

115 TOUR OF EUROPE, REFUSED BY JEWISH BANKERS. Potok, id., p. 384, 386. See also, 

n. THE RICH JEWS WILL GIVE NOTHING, in this Part. 

116 “JEWISH JULES VERNE”; BETRAYER. Sachar, id., p. 271-272. 

117 AN ISOLATED AND LONELY MAN. Potok, p. 384. 

118 THE JEWS OF EASTERN EUROPE BELIEVED HERZL. Sachar, p. 271, Potok, 382. 

119 UNDER THE NAME JUDENSTAAT. Potok, at p. 385. Gottheil, id., at pp. 85, 233, n.1 & 4. 

120 THE COOL REASONING OF THE PHILOSOPHER. Gottheil, p. 83, 91. Autoemancipation 

was a an early “Jewish State” Work written by a Jewish physician Leo Pinsker in 1882. See also, 

other references to Pinsker in This Introduction. 



they have been driven, and more than strangers because they had no land of their 

own in which they and others could feel that they were completely at home. 121/ 

(This has all the tone, color and shape of Expulsion in Genesis). 

Pinsker’s plan would make use of “alliances”: the Alliance Israélite Universelle, the 

Vienna Allianz, and the Anglo-Jewish Association of London. 122/ Another Jew, Israel Zangwill, 

writing in synonymous terms and citing from the Talmud 123/ , said what recent American White, 

Anglo-Saxon Protestant protestors have been saying for a long time: 

“He that owns no land is no man.” 

The “Hibbat Zion” movement, 124/ already in existence, held a very generalized version of 

a “Jewish State” idea which had been loosely forming until Herzl appeared. Young Jews wanted 

a homeland, not in Europe where they believed they could not remain, but in Palestine, which 

was held at the time by the Ottoman Empire. 

121 THE ROOT OF THE EVIL . Gottheil, at pp. 63-64. If the Jew has no homeland, and if he has 

no sense of “property” as such, it is little to be doubted that the Jew would have little regard for 

the “property” held by others, and at the same time look upon it in a schizophrenic personality 

that wants what it had from the beginning but has not now. While the Jewish State of “Israel” 

exists today, most all Jews are not part of it: this lies primarily at the door of the Jews 

themselves. See also, Note regarding The Landless Man, and, INTRODUCTION, Part 14, 

JUDAISM AS AN INFLICTED MENTAL ILLNESS, in This Book. (Ed.). 

122 

ALLIANCES. Gottheil, p. 65. 

123 

HE THAT OWNS NO LAND IS NO MAN. Gottheil, id., Chp. V., “The Jewish Congress,” 

p. 138. 

124 THE “HIBBAT ZION” MOVEMENT. Or, Hibbat Ziyyon, “Love of Zion.” A movement 

organized by Russian Jews as intellectuals and university students, shortly after the 1880’s 

pogroms (anti-Jewish rioting) to purchase Palestine from the Sultan. Gottheil, Zionism, Chp. III., 

“Leo Pinsker and Autoemancipation,” p. 67. 

The “Zionist” movement, a different group, started in the 1850’s, and joined the younger 

“Hibbat Zion.” (Potok, id.). Another Jewish “homeland” group, Chovevi Zion (or, Hobebe 

Ziyyon) was “a movement which sought to give tangible expression to the newly awakened 

interest in Palestine...regarded as spadeworkers in a cause greater than they themselves 

imagined.” (Gottheil, id., pp. 72-73). Zionism started to occupy the position Chovevi Zion 

societies should have taken, there was a noticeable discord between the two parties. Gottheil, p. 

73. 

“The Mizarchi Fraction...were known to be in a large majority [and to] have run a strong 

religious thread through the fabric of Zionism, and it is not at all times been easy to meet their 

exigencies in the solution of other than purely religious questions...Again, there were also 

extreme Palestinians [i.e., Jews favoring a Jewish State of “Palestine”], the so-called Ziyyon 

Zionists. These were impatient of delay in furthering what was called `practical work’ in 

Palestine, and some went even so far as to demand the transference of the whole movement, bag 

and baggage, to the Promised Land.” Gottheil, pp. 135, 152 and 226 n. 4, citing “Protokoll des 

Neunten Zionist-Kongresses,” at p. 239. 

The Jews are not “as one,” nor as perfectly organized and entirely co-operative 

with each other, as non-Jews think the Jews are. A hidden tool, which we fail to use. (Ed.). 



Hibbat Zion made the most use of Herzl’s work, and sought his appointment as their 

leader; Herzl accepted. Herzl’s diary: “Our entire youth, all those who are now between twenty 

and thirty years of age, will abandon their vague socialistic leanings and turn to me. They will 

go forth as itinerant preachers to their own families and into the world...” 125/ Thus, Herzl became 

the leader of the Zionist movement; he had now a following and a means to begin. “Herzl 

possessed in a larger measure than most men intellectual grace and persuasive enthusiasm. In a 

short time, he was surrounded by a band of determined men, to whom his word was almost law, 

his wish a command. They put themselves willingly under his somewhat autocratic rule....” 126/ 

This may explain the superior-to-the-subordinate tone perceived when reading The Protocols of 

the Learned Elders of Zion, for there is no requests, only information and strategy, to be found 

there. 

Herzl then wrote a book, Altneuland — Old New Land, a novel of Palestine in his 

visions. 127/ “If you will, it is not a dream,” was the motto of his book, 128/ and it is said that “[t]he 

creation of the Jewish state has eliminated anti-Semitism throughout the world.” 129/ 

As a leader of a small yet well-known movement, Herzl travelled throughout European 

Jewry, and also met with and gained support from the grand duke of Baden, Germany — the 

uncle of Germany’s Kaiser William II. 130/ The Islamic grand viser in then-Constantinople, 

rejected the idea of a Jewish nation-state and also Herzl’s offer to find money to relieve the 

Ottoman financial problems as inducement to approve. He ideas were rejected, on the basis that 

no one can organize all the Jewish peoples. 131/ 

125 

OUR ENTIRE YOUTH. Potok, p. 385. 

126 

A BAND OF DETERMINED MEN. Gottheil, id., Chp. VI, “Theodor Herzl,” pp. 83-84. True 

to Jewish form, Gottheil suggests of Herzl: “No leader of men has ever been placed in exactly 

the same position” — which makes sense, since every man’s “position” is going to be different 

than the same one the day, or even moment, before. But all leaders fail without a similar “band 

of determined men.” (Ed.). 

127 ALTNEULAND — OLD NEW LAND, A NOVEL OF PALESTINE. Potok, p. 382, Sachar, p. 

275. 

128 IF YOU WILL, IT IS NOT A DREAM. Potok, p. 386. This inspiring idea conflicts with the 

actual practice of Jewish/Zionist rhetoric of today, when the Palestinian people have a similar 

“dream” of a homeland called “Palestine,” deriving its presence in a land-mass allegedly under 

the control of Jewish Israel military occupation forces. And the Israeli government says the 

Palestinian’s idea will remain “a dream,” as of Spring, 1996. 

129 

THE JEWISH STATE HAS ELIMINATED ANTI-SEMITISM. Potok, at p. 386. This is 

hardly true. The Reader can perceive that falseness in that Jewish statement by merely looking, 

listening, and reading. The Jews, as long as they remain Talmudic in their ways, will always 

suffer the condemnation of the world for only that reason; and if none other, this: “LONG- 

STANDING HABITS CANNOT BE UNDONE WITH A SOFT-SPOKEN WORD.” Nolan, 

Communism v. the Negro, p. 178. 

THE WORLD HATES THE JEW BECAUSE THE JEW HATES THE WORLD (Ed.). 

130 THE KAISER’s SUPPORT. Encycl. Jud., p. 412; Potok, p. 385. 

131 CANNOT ORGANIZE THE JEWS. Encycl. Jud., p. 412. This may conflict with the fact that 

by A.D.1895, as individual Jews, with help from other Jews, gained control over so much of 

European monies, which Herzl had just attempted to acquire. (Ed.). 



At a Hibbat Zionist meeting on March 6, 1897, Herzl called for the First Zionist 

Congress, to be held from August 29-31, 1897, in Basel, Switzerland. Formal attire was to be 

worn by all members, to emphasize the importance of the meetings and promote a sober and 

contemplative environment. Some Zionists laughed, disapproved; others many accepted. With 

Herzl as elected chairman, the Congress adopted Herzl’s programs — predicting a Jewish State 

within 50 years. They elected him president of their newly established “World Zionist 

Organization.” 132/ Now the Jewish people at large could be the Herzl constituency; but if 

wealthy Jewish bankers refused to help him, the common Jewry received him in great mass 

meetings. 133/ After the First Congress, Herzl started Die Welt, a newsletter designed to promote 

the Zionist Congress’ ideas. From there, the Zionist movement officially began as it is known 

today. Herzl wrote in his diary: “In Basel, I created the Jewish State.” 134/ 

Traveling about to gain approval of his Jewish State, in perhaps Uganda, Africa, or 

Mesopotamia, Turkey, Egypt, 135/ or elsewhere. 136/ Herzl met with many leading world figures, 

including the Catholic Pope of that day, who said: 

“There are two possibilities. Either the Jews will cling to their faith and continue 

to await the Messiah who, for us, has already appeared. In that case they will be 

denying the divinity of Jesus and we cannot help them. Or else they will go there 

without any religion, and them we can he even less favorable to them,” 137/ 

and the Sultan of Turkey — soon to be the victim of the “Young Turk” revolution alleged to be 

comprised mainly Jewish revolutionaries. The Sultan “plied Herzl with cigarettes, the grand 

Cordon of the Order of the Medjidje, and the vague promise of a charter; but he also wanted to 

see the color of Herzl’s money.” 138/ 

But all did not go well for Herzl. Zionist activities far outreached Herzl’s. Zionist 

societies increased from 117 to 913 in one year. 139/ In fact, it was the infusion of Russian Jewry 

which insured the strength and permanency of the Zionist movement. 140/ 

132 ELECTIONS TO ZIONIST LEADERSHIP OFFICE(S). Sachar, id., p. 272, Potok, p. 382. 

133 HERZL’s SUCCESSES. Potok, p. 386-387. 

134 IN BASEL, I CREATED THE JEWISH STATE. Sachar, id., p. 272. 

135 EGYPT. At the suggestion from Joseph Chamberlain, then-Britain’s Secretary of State for 

Colonial Affairs, of Egypt for the Jews, Herzl replied, “No, Mr. Secretary, we will not go there. 

We have already been there.” Sachar, id., p. 274. 

136 UGANDA, AFRICA, OR MESOPOTAMIA, TURKEY, ETC. Sachar, p. 277; Potok, id., p. 

382; Gottheil, id., whether in Palestine, p. 93; East Africa, p. 131, 135-137; Cyrenaica (an 

ancient country in Africa*), Canada, Australia, Mesopotamia, or Angola, p. 141; *Webst. Int’l. 

Dict., 2nd Ed., p. 658. 

137 THE CATHOLIC POPE’S COMMENTS ON THE JEWISH STATE. Potok, id., p. 387. 

138 THE SULTAN: THE COLOR OF HERZL’S MONEY.” Sachar, id., p. 273. 

139 ZIONIST SOCIETIES INCREASED. Sachar, id., p. 273. 

140 THE STRENGTH AND PERMANENCY OF THE ZIONIST MOVEMENT. Sachar, p. 273. 

It was the same kind of infusion later to afflict America during the Roosevelt Administration and 

never un-afflict it to this day. (Ed.). 



Within a year of the Zionist Congress, Herzl was under attack from those below him in 

Zionism who challenged him for his aloofness, his lack of enthusiasm to the Jewish traditions 

and Hebrew language rather than The German, as Herzl desired it. He was a man of the western, 

secular ways, not the eastern Jewish ways. “He was a journalist; he understood the insidious 

nature of diplomacy and the cruelty of power. He knew the language and protocol of kings and 

diplomats.” 141/ He had no hope for a Jewish press, Jewish assemblies, Jewish schools, nor a life 

thoroughly rooted in the “Hebraic idiom. Herzl’s view of Palestine for the Jews was simply a 

political and technical answer to the problems of the Jew. 142/ “Zionism was the Sabbath of my 

life,” said Herzl’s diary. 143/ 

But he was not a “Russian Jew’s Jew.” “He was full of Western dignity. which did not 

set well with our Russian-Jewish realism,” as he objected to Herzl and his colleague’s 

aristocratic “pretensions” and flaunting of their “contacts” with influential statesmen, 144/ as the 

coarse Russians seized more and more control over Zionism. “Nor was one less prepared for the 

work he was to be called upon to do than was Herzl...He had taken no part in the Jewish 

revival,...He was practically a stranger to his people, and they to him...Palestine exercises no 

fascination upon him. He shows no trace of a knowledge of the Chovevi Zion 

movements 145/ ...but the moment Herzl came into real contact with the Jewish people, he issued 

the parole: `Zionism means a return to Judaism prior to a return to a Jewish land.’” 146/ 

His adversaries were unconvinced. For his diary in 1898, Herzl wrote: “Rivalries are 

beginning. They already want to depose me.” 147/ Herzl’s heart complications were worsened by 

the strife of who and what the new Jewish State would be. In 1904, he died, at age 44. Many 

followers were “shocked” to hear of it. 148/ 

Herzl was plainly the leading organizer of only those Jews who desired to play an 

important, active role in the establishment of “Zion” as the Jewish State, he was the chairman of 

the First Zionist Congress, and the president of the World Zionist Organization established by 

that Congress. It would be Herzl who would also be the one who would be the keynote speaker, 

if not the most important and frequent speaker, of the purposes and plans of Zionism. If anyone 

were to know of, conduct, or preside over any “secret” meetings, it would be Herzl. It is most 

likely that Herzl, therefore, would be the one to whom most logical thought would turn, for 

141 HE WAS A JOURNALIST; HE KNEW THE LANGUAGE. Potok, Wanderings: History of 

the Jews, Book Four, “Secularism: Messiahs for a Broken World,” p. 386. 

142 A POLITICAL AND TECHNICAL ANSWER. Sachar, p. 275. 

143 ZIONISM WAS THE SABBATH. Sachar, id., p. 278 

144 WESTERN DIGNITY, NOT RUSSIAN-JEWISH REALISM. Sachar, id., p. 277, quoting 

Chaim Weizmann, later the creator of The Jewish Agency. 

145 LESS PREPARED FOR THE WORK. Gottheil, id., pp. 84-85, 90-91. 

146 A RETURN TO JUDAISM, FIRST. Gottheil, id., p. 193. 

147 RIVALRIES ARE BEGINNING. Potok, p. 387. 

148 “SHOCKED” TO HEAR OF HERZL’s DEATH. Gottheil, p. 82; July 3, 1904. Potok, p. 387. 

The Reader, whether Christian, Muslim, or Jew, must at this time remember that Herzl, a man of 

his times — as we all are of our own, accomplished what few-of-the-few think about or think 

possible. It confirms the UnKnown-Source: `Genius requires its necessary measure of madness 

to make it work — but such madness must not unwatched go.’ A careful review of the “Smith 

Biography” in the Introduction of This Book, at Smith, note 1, is helpful. (Ed.). 



finding the nearest person available to be named and credited as The Author of The Protocols of 

the Learned Elders of Zion. 

The other accounts of events presented in This Book, and in the sources The Compiler 

and Editor of This Book has relied upon — books, pamphlets, papers, etc., of mostly Jewish 

origins — of Herzl and of the acquisition of the documents known from the beginning as The 

Protocols Zion, The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion, or the Wise Men of Zion, will 

provide sources and facts which, by the coincidence of those details, will direct The Reader to 

determine if The Protocols are true, and who authored them. This is The reader’s right; and 

anyone who would speak out against that right, or obstruct that right, is not a friend of “freedom” 

as they might purport to be. 

Part 18. 

ENCYCLOPEDIA JUDAICA’s 

HISTORY OF THE PROTOCOLS 

The first edition of The Protocols available to the Russian public appeared in about 1905. 

It is suggested by the opponents of it that the ideas therein were not taken seriously by anyone, 

except those of the “few mystic and sectarian circles only.” (Encycl. Jud.). The worldwide 

success of The Protocols began in 1919. It grew in acceptance especially after the Russian 

Bolshevik Revolution and the uprisings in Germany in the early 1920’s. Many people in those 

countries arrived at the conclusion that there was a “hidden hand” or unseen cause for those 

tragic and violent events. The publication of The Protocols was widely circulated to expose the 

“Jewish Revolution” inciting the Russian civil war. There was said to be a great coincidence 

between the theories disclosed in The Protocols and the realities of the violence and excessive 

killings perpetrated in southern Russia between 1918 and 1920. (Encycl. Jud). After the Red 

(Bolshevik/Jewish) armies defeated the White (Christian) armies, Russian emigres escaping to 

The West began publishing The Protocols, and many translations of it followed. The most 

reputable newspapers in Europe, already under the Jewish control described in Protocol No. ??, 

merely questioned the “authority” of the document, yet apparently did not say anything more 

than that. 

In 1921, it is alleged that an English Journalist, Philip Graves, “pointed out the close 

similarity between the text of The Protocols and Joly’s pamphlet. 149/ This it is alleged, caused 

“balanced and responsible circles” to refuse to accept The Protocols as a serious document. 

(Encycl. Jud.). However, a “balanced” and responsible” could easily be defined to mean: under 

the influence of the aggressive suggestions of Jewish thought placed in their midst; and, 

responding favorably to the abilities of the Jews to bring such thought to bear upon them). 

There was an enormous circulation of the Protocols text, which was translated in to all of 

the main languages of the world. In the United States, The Protocols received its greatest 

support from Henry Ford, Sr., the famous and very wealthy automobile manufacturer. 

149 JOLY. This editor has reviewed over a dozen books on the French national history, and none 

of those works mention a “Maurice Joly,” nor any reasonable spelling of that name; nor is there 

reference to any such pamphlet against Napoleon III. It may be a pseudonym. See also, n.M. 

MAURICE JOLY, below. 



Well before the rise of National Socialism (Nazi) power, the greatest adherents to The 

Protocols were found in Germany, where it was accepted as fact — a knowledge that was such 

as to be generally accepted, based upon historical fact and personal experience. The 

Bolshevik/Communists were continually attempting to overthrow the existing German Wiemar 

government, and causing foment in the finances of government and private life alike, to great 

disaster to the people. 

The Encyclopedia Judaica admits that “[t]he theories of an occult power of the Jews, 

sworn enemies of the German-Christian culture, perfectly suited those reactionary propagandists 

who attributed Germany’s defeat [in W.W.I.] to à stab in the back,’” referring to the subtle, 

concerted — and thoroughly effective — Jewish influence in the details of the Articles of the 

Treaty of Versailles of 1918, which placed a defeated Germany at such a great economic and 

military disadvantage on the European continent. It is interesting to note that the Jews admit to 

being sworn as anti-Christian. 

To combat the Protocols acceptance there was established in Eurfut, Germany, the 

“Weltdienst” organization (perhaps Weltdiensf-Konzept), which was specially formed to diffuse 

the effects of The Protocols, and to strengthen ties with anti-semites in other countries. 150/ 

In Berne, Switzerland, during 1934, the Jewish community sued the distributors of The 

Protocols; at the trial, they tried to establish that the document was a “forgery” (again, they did 

not say it was untrue or false — but merely by omission of the words that it was only an 

“unauthorized” reproduction). However, this trial did nothing to diminish the zeal of those 

enlightening other Christians of the evils described in The Protocols and exemplified in 

historical and then-current events. 

Before and during the Second World War (W.W.II.), the understanding of The Protocols 

became even more widespread, and incited an implied justification for the persecution of the 

Jews who were referred to, directly and indirectly, in that document. The Protocols have been 

reissued in numerous Arab countries, and Egyptian president Nassar publicly guaranteed their 

authenticity. 

A Spanish edition of The Protocols was published in 1963, because of that, there was 

said to have been an attempt to prevent the revision of the traditional anti-Jewish attitude of 

Roman Catholic Church, during the Ecumenical Council Vatican II. 

The Encyclopedia Judaica suggests that “[s]ince 1945 no more than bibliographic 

curiosity in the majority of civilized countries...” This may settle the disturbed minds of its 

Jewish readership, but it does not settle “the Jewish Question” regarding The Protocols and its 

continued readership and prevailing acceptance. 

The nationalistic feelings, that are always aroused in times of War or Economic distress 

(which almost always results in War), resulted in every country in a certain and very measurable 

degree of “anti-semitism” agitation (actually anti-Jewishness agitation — especially when One 

considers exactly Who Are The Semites), which left dangerous and probably very justifiable 

150 THE “WELTDIENST” ORGANIZATION. See: Encycl. Jud., id., p. 582. 



seeds behind it. The popular equation of “Jews & Bolshevik are the Same,” alleged to be 

unjustified by The Jews themselves, made the situation more delicate for The Jew — who looked 

upon Christians and other non-Jews as mere goyim, or unclean cattle, mere talking animals, in 

need of care and herding; and that same situation was even more trying for The Christian — in 

whose mind there was the conflict between the popular beliefs of the Good Jew as the Origins of 

Christianity versus the Bad Jew who was responsible for not any mere “sentiment” but actual 

anti-Christian acts accomplished in secret by those same Jews, brought to the Light through the 

diligence attention and investigation of those Christians (and non-Jews) aware of the Jewish 

threat to a stable Christian life. In every country in Old Europe, the Protocols of the Elders of 

Zion, purporting as the Jews repeatedly say to reveal in a series of fantastic documents 

mysteriously discovering a “Jewish plot” to secure the domination of the entire world, had 

considerable circulation and secured credence in social and political circles which were not 

usually so gullible as to accept anything that was to be looked upon as far-fetched. 151/ 

“It took lies and forgeries,” says this Jewish document, “which had been proved fake in 

Europe, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but a short time to germinate and spread to 

America.” [See n.__?] Yet, unexplained by anyone is this: If such utterances and publications 

were in fact “lies and fakes,” why should they endure the years as “truth and fact” for so many 

peoples in so many lands — most of which have suffered a fate as near to the inclinations of The 

Protocols as any reasonable person can determine — especially when the Reader of The Present 

Day News Media compares that Media Reportings to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, doing 

so equally and “liberally” and with a sense of universal brotherhood of righteousness, can arrive 

at no other conclusion but that the principles of The Protocols are true, and that they are a fact? 

Part 19. 

SOME BRIEF DEFINITIONS OF WORDS USED 

BY THE “JEWISH” AUTHOR OF THE PROTOCOLS 

“Agentur” and “The Political” 

There are two words in this translation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

which are unusual, the words “Agentur” and “the political.” 

Used as a substantive (or, noun), “Agentur” appears to be a word adopted from the 

original text of The Protocols, and it means ‘the whole body of agents, and agencies’ made use 

of by The Elders, whether members of the tribe or their Gentile tools. 

By “the Political,” Mr. Marsden means, not exactly the “body politic,” but ‘the entire 

machinery of politics.’ 

The Term, GOYIM 

The Jewish term Goyim, generally meaning Gentiles or non-Jews, is used throughout The 

Protocols, and “Goyim” is retained by Mr. Nilus and Mr. Marsden in this edition and translation. 

Goy and Goyim are defined in the text of The Protocols as they appear. Many cites, perhaps 

later, confirm that goyim also means “cattle, beast of the field,” etc. It explains much. 

Other terms are often defined as they appear in Book Two, the “Annotated Text.” 

151 THE NATIONALISTIC FEELINGS THAT ARE ALWAYS AROUSED. Encycl. Jud., id. 



Part 20. 

THE “SYMBOLIC SNAKE” OF JUDAISM 

(Mostly cited from The Protocols Introduction) 

(of Smith, Christian National Crusade,) 

(And From Jewish Sources.) 

Protocol No. 3 opens with a reference to the “Symbolic Snake” of Judaism. 152/ In his 

Epilogue to the 1905 edition of The Protocols., Mr. Nilus gives the following interesting account 

of this symbol: 

According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned 

men had as early as 929 B.C., thought out a scheme in theory for a peaceful conquest of the 

whole universe by Zion. 

As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail and completed by men who 

were subsequently initiated in this question. These learned men decided by peaceful means to 

conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent 

those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the 

Snake to represent the Jewish people — the administration was always kept secret, even from 

the Jewish nation itself. 153/ 

As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it 

undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake 

has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to 

run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed 

its round of Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every 

endeavor to subdue the other countries by an economical conquest. 

The return of the head of the Snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of 

all the Sovereigns of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises 

and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about a spiritual 

demoralization and a moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women 

masquerading as French, Italians, etc. These are the surest spreaders of licentiousness into the 

lives of the leading men at the heads of nations. 

Binjamin Segel, the early 20th Century Jewish “historian” of The Protocols, has this to 

say about The Snake, or The Serpent: 

152 SYMBOLIC SNAKE. Compare the purpose, function, and rejection of the snake, in The 

Bible. 

153 NATIONAL IGNORANCE OF THE PROTOCOLS. Compare how other nations are 

continually held by the Jews to account for their wrongs, while the Jews themselves are often 

guilty of the same wrongs, and not told of these deeds anymore than any other national peoples 

are told of their own wrongs. 



The serpent’s tail rests upon Zion, but the body, with head in front, slithers over 

the entire world. Coiling into the bosom of the [nation-] states it encounters, the 

serpent gnaws at and devours all non-Jewish state forces by means of liberal 

constitutions and economic dislocations. The serpent has already passed through 

seven stages of world history. Beginning with Greece in the Age of Pericles, it 

gnawed at the power and greatness of this land. The Seventh Stage was reached 

in St. Petersburg, in 1881, the year when the Tzar Alexander II was assassinated. 

With the return of the serpent’s head to Zion, the Symbolic Snake will end its 

circuit through the world history. Then it will have embraced all of Europe, all 

the world. 

But this return of the serpent’s head to Zion can only take place if all the 

powers of Europe are brought low by the destruction and devastation the Jewish 

people have everywhere brought with them, and the moral degradation and ruin 

that always accompany liberalism.” 154/ 

Segel, also makes reference to “St Ephriam” and the serpent mark on the forehead and 

right hand, mentioned `centuries ago spoke’ (??) p. 109, 109 and 112-14. 

According to the Christian Nationalist Crusade edition of The Protocols of the Learned 

Men of Zion, 155/ a literary “map” of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: 

Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C., in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the 

Snake first started “eating” into the power of that country. 

The second stage was in Rome in the time of the emperor Augustus, about 69 B.C. 

The third stage was in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1521. 

The fourth state was in Paris, about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. (Napoleon also 

granted the Jews citizenship rights in his effort to gain support; until that time, Jews had been 

unenfranchised of any rights of ordinary citizens, because of their religious and political 

practices which were deemed anti-Christian). 

The fifth state was in London, from about 1814 onwards (after the downfall of 

Napoleon). 

The sixth stage was in Merlin, in 1871, after the Franco-Prussian war. 

The seventh state was in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under 

the date of “1881.” 

Possibly the ninth stage would be after the successful Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in 

Russia in 1917. 

Is it possible that the tenth stage occurred during the 1920-1930’s, when eventually 

Franklin Delano Roosevelt introduced — or was compelled to introduce? — so many Jews into 

the federal government that he was accused of being a “Jew lover,” and at the same time the 

federal bureaucracy increased its size and powers with such magnitude, swiftness, and ferocity 

that not even the lawyers could keep up with it, complain though they did? 

154 SEGEL’S “SERPENT/SNAKE” INTERPRETATION. Levy, A Lie & Libel, re: Segel, 

“History,” at pp. 112-113. 

155 

CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST CRUSADE EDITION. See: Smith, The International Jew 

(Abridged ed.). 



All these nation-states through which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of 

their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power forming no exception to the rule. 

In economic conditions, England and Germany are spared, but only until the conquest of Russia 

is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. 

The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement 

towards Moscow, Kieft, and Odessa. 156/ 

It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centers (or perhaps, 

“centres”) of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople (Istanbul, today) is shown as the last stage 

of the Snake’s course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This literary “map” for Europe was “drawn” 

only a few years before the occurrence of the “Young Turk” 157/ — the Jewish — Revolution in 

Turkey, 1908). 

The Liberty Lobby, a conservative group, offered its appreciation to the Anti-Defamation 

League (ADL) for providing them with the design of the `Snake and Radio Microphone’ — not 

shown in here — which was used on one of Liberty Lobby’s book covers. 158/ The Snake design 

first appeared on page 3 of the June, 1974 issue of the ADL Bulletin, and used by the ADL to 

preface an article about the Liberty Lobby. The artwork is significant, the reader is told, because 

it vividly illustrates a key technique of the ADL: distorting and reversing issues. 

Part 21. 

BIBLE-BASED SOURCES REGARDING THE “SYMBOLIC SNAKE” 

Consider also The Bible’s rejection of the snake. (“Snake” is not found in Strong’s 

Exhaustive Bible Concordance (Abington Press, Nashville, 1942); nor The New Strong’s 

Exhaustive Bible Concordance, (Nelson Pub., Nashville, 1984); therefore, see “Serpent”). 

The “Serpent” was contrasted by Jesus to the wholesome fish. (Note how the early 

Christians used the shape of a fish as a logo, or design, for picturing in hieroglyphics the new 

Christian faith). 

Serpent cults were popular with all “Semites.” In Hebrew symbolism, the serpent 

denoted one who is hostile to God’s plans (Isaiah 27:1. See Harper’s Bible Dictionary, Miller & 

Miller, ed., New York, Harper & Bros., Pub. 1959, 6th ed.) p. 665. 

To the Christians it was a symbol of Satan. (The Twentieth Century Bible Commentary, 

Rev.Ed., Davies, ed.; N.Y. Harper & Bros., Pub.; 1955, p. 517). Frequent allusions are made by 

sacred writers to the serpent as an emblem of wickedness, cruelty and treacherousness. The 

156 MOSCOW, KIEFT, AND ODESSA. These are cities in Russia. 

157 THE “YOUNG TURK.” A political “reform” party, who “wanted to restore the greatness of 

the Ottoman Empire...and eliminate corruption,” that overthrew the Sultan Abdul Hamid II. 

World Book Encycl. (1973) Turkey, Vol. 19-T, p. 419. 

158 LIBERTY LOBBY BOOK COVER. Conspiracy Against Freedom: A Documentation of One 

Campaign of the Anti-Defamation League Against Freedom of Speech and Thought in America, 

Liberty Lobby Staff, Willis A. Cato, ed. (Washington, D.C., 1986); see the copyright page. 



Devil is called “the old serpent (Rev. 12:9). (The System Bible, Chicago, the System Bible Co., 

1933, Section I, Historical Digest, p. 289). 

The serpent was itself a visible likeness of the evil from which Israel was suffering. 

(Abington’s Bible Commentary, Nashville, Tenn., Abington Press 1929, p. 1144). Throughout 

the East (i.e., the “Bible lands”) the serpent was used a an emblem of evil principle of the spirit 

of disobedience and contumacy. 159/ 

Part 22. 

SOME JEWISH ANSWERS TO A “JEWISH WORLD CONSPIRACY” 

Under its article on Learned Elders of Zion, The Protocols of, The Encyclopedia Judaica 

goes on to say that The Protocols suggest there is the specter of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy, 

specifically designed towards reducing the Gentiles (non-Jewish people of all races, and 

religions) to slavery or to extermination. This idea is said to have its origins “in the Christian 

imagination” during the Middle Ages, because of “legends” about the Jews of Old Europe, and 

how for example the Jews were accused of poisoning water-wells and spreading The Plague 

disease. These ideas began in Spain, and later in France and Germany, after Napoleon’s 

convocation of “The Great Sanhedrin,” in 1807 A.D. Jewish sources provide no documentation 

for these “legends.” If any such proof for or against these legends existed, the documents would 

have offered them up for consideration, in their Jewish defense. 160/ 

It is also said by the Jews that Christians of olden days were misguided by the belief that 

there was a secret rabbinical conference held on annual or less often occasions, whereat there 

was worked out a detained plan for ritual genocide of the Christians and other peoples who were 

not Jewish. (See n.__?) Jewish publications tell themselves that these ideas did not gain 

widespread acceptance, partly because of the illiteracy of the people in general, and because 

of.... 

Thereafter, there appeared in the late 1800’s, versions of these ideas offered by the 

French Catholic authors Barruel and Bailly. In these versions, it was said that Freemasons and 

the Jews united into an anti-Christian plot. 

In more recent versions of The Protocols, the legend of “The Elders of Zion” was said to 

have been concocted in Paris, France late in the 1800’s, by an author, said to be “unknown,” who 

was at that time working for Czar Nicholas II’s secret police (or, the Okhrana). If not that, then 

it was “concocted by the Russian czars’ disinformation service. It was successively used by the 

czarist police, the Whites in the Russian civil war, the German and other Nazis, and certain Arab 

governments and organizations, in their anti-Jewish propaganda.” 161/ The intent of non-Jews in 

159 THE SERPENT AS EVIL PRINCIPLE . A Dictionary of the Bible, Wm. Smith, LLD, ed, 

(Phila., The John Winston Co. 1884, 1948, p. 607), or, òf the spirit of evil.’ In accord: 

Peloubet’s Bible Dictionary, (Phila., the John Winston Co. 1913, 1926, p. 606). 

160 FORGERY CLAIMS IN JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIAS. See, i.e., Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 

6, p. 581-83 (1971 ed.); The New Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 127-28 (1962 ed). 

161 CZARS’ DISINFORMATION SERVICE. Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, id., p. 23. 



offering The Protocols to the world was to enlighten the Czar about this secret police and to 

favorable influence his policies toward that secret police and its usefulness. 

This anonymous Czarist employee/author, described by the Jews as a “forger,” is alleged 

to have adapted an old French political pamphlet written by M. Maurice Joly 162/ in 1864, titled 

Dialogue aux Dnfers intre Machiavel et Montesquieu, au la politique ay xixe siécle, 163/ (or, 

Dialogue Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in Hell and, “the forgers took this pamphlet, 

substituted world Jewry for the French emperor, and added a number of picturesque details 

borrowed from an obscure [and unnamed] German novel.” 164/ In the French pamphlet, M. Jolly 

suggested Napoleon III had ambitions of world domination, but it did not make any reference to 

the Jews or to Judaism. 165/ 

Rashi, (Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac) the great Jewish scholar of the eleventh 

century...[Unfinished Commentary -Ed.]. 

The Jews allege that the writer of Russian version of The Protocols had changed these 

Joly/French “protocols” into the “protocols” of a conference of the leaders of the world Jewry 

meeting at that time, and that this meeting decided that, under the cloak of modern democracy, 

they (the Jews) had already gained control of the policies of numerous European states, and were 

therefore very close to obtaining success in achieving their objective(s). 

It does not seem likely that The Protocols are a “Joly” imitation; Napoleon is not 

characterized by any historian as being a specific despot, he was a general despot, i.e., Napoleon 

only wanted power and domination, not the specific suppression of, as in this case, any particular 

religion. Indeed, Napoleon “emancipated” the Jews after his ascension to power and ultimately 

to Emperor, 166/ so no publication set forth as a characterization of Napoleon could reasonably 

162 M. MAURICE JOLY. Also known as “Maurice Joel,” a Jewish revolutionary; a communist 

and predecessor to Trotsky-like theory. Levy, A Lie & Libel, re: Segel, “History,” at. 68. See also 

n.JOLY, above. 

163 JOLY, AUTHOR OF NAPOLEON SPOOFS. See: Levy, A Lie & a Libel; Encycl. Jud., 

“Learned Elders, The Protocols of.” 

164 PICTURESQUE DETAILS. See: Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, id., at p. 108. 

165 THE “JOLY” WRITINGS AS A BASIS. See also, Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, id., p. 

108. 

166 NAPOLEON “EMANCIPATION” OF THE JEWS. Potok, Wanderings: History of The Jews, 

pp. 366, 374. This emancipation was done “in two stages: the Sephardic Jews of the south, ion 

January 28, 1790,...on September 27, 1791, the Ashkenazi Jews of the north...” (Potok, p. 366. 

But, “[i]n 1807, one Hasidic tzaddik Shneur Zalman of Lyady, urged his followers to spy against 

Napoleon on behalf of Russia. Ìf Bonaparte wins,’ he says, `the wealthy among [Jewish] Israel 

would increase and the greatness of Israel would be raised, but they would leave and take the 

heart of Israel far from our Father in Heaven. Hasidism greeted with suspicion the Napoleonic 

order to put an end to the ghettos in the lands France conquered.” id., p. 356. 

The Reader may now be surprisingly enlightened: Most non-Jews believe “Ghettos” are 

equivalent to “slums, deteriorated buildings, unfit for human living.” Not true. In Ford, Int’l Jew, 

Leo N. Levi, the president of the American Jewish Committee in the early 1900’s, said in his 

own words how it is revealed that the Jews desired these “ghettos”; that the Jews wanted it for 

themselves: 

“The Ghetto is not a corner into which the non-Jews have herded the Semites; the 



expect to fit into a “Jewish world domination,” anti-semite publication. Therefore, The 

Protocols, if written as an original work, fit the times and they fit the people about whom it 

speaks, then and now. 

Part 23. 

THE “OPINIONS” OF RUSSIA’s CZAR NICHOLAS 

ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS, ACCORDING TO JEWISH SOURCES 

Popular Jewish knowledge has it that the Russian Czar, upon reading a Russian version 

of The Protocols, apparently wrote in the margin of his version/edition, “One does not defend a 

worthy cause by vile means.” 167/ Another Jewish account has the Czar speaking this way: “It is 

impossible to defend something sacred by dirty means.” 168/ The question here is: did the Czar 

refer, most probably, to the religious Orthodox Russia as the “sacred something”? or — most unlikely, 

to the Jewish sacred idea of “Zion”? (Ed.). 

The Encyclopedia Judaica asserts that such a notation by the Czar — “impressionable 

and anti-Semitic as he was” — showed his rejection of the document, and recognized it as an 

device of fraud; and further that it meant this notation was a rejection of the truth of the matters 

offered in The Protocols, yet it offer no more in support. 169/ 

Any objective reader could easily arrive at the conclusion that, in so noting, the Czar 

most likely realized there was no mere coincidence between the acts of revolutionary anti- 

Czarist Jewry and that of the plans exposed in The Protocols as being the former obeying the 

latter; and that, if the Jews’ plan was worthy, it would not resort to such vile means as described 

as being necessary, and as being put into action, in the execution of The Protocols in Russia. 

Part 24. 

THE “PRINCE” SYSTEM OF JUDAISM OR ZIONISM 

In Judaism or in Zionism, there is a “prince” system, where there is one “prince” of the 

world, who commands all Jews and others subject to that world. Next, there is a “Prince of the 

East,” i.e., of the eastern hemisphere of the earth; a “Prince of the West,” there; a Prince of North 

America, and of South America, for examples. The Prince of the World should be found in 

probably Istanbul, the ancient place of The Sanhedrin; the Prince of the Ease has headquarters in 

London; the Prince of the West, in New York City. Each Prince has lower levels of subject 

Ghetto is a spot carved out of the community and consecrated [by and] to the 

Chosen People and is therefore the best section of the city in Jewish eyes, the rest 

being `the Christian quarter.’” See: Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. III, “Jewish Influences in 

American Life,” Chp. LV., “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” at p. 174, 

quoting a Memorial for Levi by the B’nai B’rith at p. 260. See also, Dearborn 

Independent, May 14, 1921. 

167 CZAR NICHOLAS COMMENTS ON “VILE MEANS.” Encycl. Jud.., “Protocols...,” p. 582. 

168 TO DEFEND SOMETHING SACRED. Levy, A Lie & A Libel, p. 16 and p. 45, at n. 4, citing 

Charles A. Rudd, The Police and the Jewish Question in Late Imperial Russia, (Nov. 20, 1993). 

169 CZAR NICHOLAS RE: PROTOCOLS. Encyc. Jud., [cite needed] 



people, who in turn are divided into still more echelons, very similar to any military or corporate 

system. Orders them flow downwards, obedience flows upwards, and the “actions committees” 

flows outward. 170/ 

“While the Romans ruled the lands of the Jews in A.D. 80, a Jewish leader, Gamaliel, 

was the ruler of the Jews — “the patriarchate of Tannas who would be willing to “render unto 

Caesar what was Caesar’s, provided the Jews were permitted to render unto God what was 

God’s. Quick to sense the advantage, the Romans recognized the new rabbinate as the voice of 

the Jews and conferred the title of Nasi, “Prince,” or Patriarch, on the head of the Sanhedrin... 

Gamaliel was confirmed as the first official Patriarch of Palestine.” — with The Reader 

remembering that was also known as the “Prince.” Here we have a Jewish author describing the 

Sanhedrin as the “office” of the “Princes.” 171/ 

Part 25. 

THE PROTOCOLS IN ARAB LANDS, 

ACCORDING TO JEWISH SOURCES 

The first Arabic translation, made from the French, was printed in Raqib Sahyun, a 

periodical published in Jerusalem by the Latin Catholic community on January 15, 1926. 172/ 

Another edition, translated from the French by an Arab Christian was published in Cairo, Egypt, 

soon thereafter. The first translation for the Muslin (Islamic) people was made from an English 

translation, presumably of the Russian-language original, (i.e., a Nilus or a Marsden translation, 

and being a “third generation,” weakens the “original intent” somewhat) and this document 

appeared likewise in Cairo in 1951, but with a lengthy introduction, followed by numerous 

editions and at least n different Arabic translations — more than any other language, including 

The German. 173/ 

One of The Protocols published in 1961 had an introduction by c Abbas Mahmud alc 

Aqqad, “a famous and respected author.” Another Protocol edition was published in 1968, 

translated by Shawqi c Abd al-Nasir, brother of the assassinated Egyptian President, Gamal Abdel 

Nasir. This particular book has been highly recommended by Egyptian presidents Nasir and 

Sadat, President c Afir of Iraq, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, Colonel Mohammed Qaddafi of 

170 

THE “PRINCE” SYSTEM. See, in this Book One, at Part 24., The “Prince” System of 

Judaism or Zionism” and also, the “Office of the “Princes,” below. See also, in Book Two, at 

Protocol No. 15.23 in n. King Of Israel; and, references to “actions committees” in Encyc. Jud. 

near the table of contents for each volume of it. “[I]n 1911, the seat of the Inner Actions 

Committee was fixed in Berlin.. when Professor Otto Warburg was [chairman].” Gottheil, 

Zionism, Chp. VI., “Post-Herzlian Period,” p. 151. 

171 

THE “OFFICE” OF THE “PRINCES.” Dimont, The Indestructible Jew, Chp.: “Act II, The 

Existentialist Dilemma: Jews, God, and Divine Pragmatism — The First Challenge: The 

Expanding Society in the Roman World — The Tyranny of Intellectuals,” at p. 146. 

172 

FIRST ARABIC TRANSLATION. Lewis, p. 199, at n. 5, citing Duaphne Tsimhoni, “The 

Arab Christians and the Palestinian National Movement during the Formative Stage,” in 

Palestinian and Middle East Conflict, Gabriel Ben-Dor, ed. (Ramat Gan., 1978) p. 79. 

173 

ARABIC PUBLICATIONS OF THE PROTOCOLS. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. 4, 

“Anti-Semites,” at p. 109. 



Lybia, and many other Arabic leaders, kings, monarchs, etc. The Protocols were published 

again in an official Egyptian cultural journal at Cairo, al-Majalla in November, 1960, by Salah 

Dasuqi, “a senior government official” — the military governor of Cairo, and later ambassador 

to Finland, and until recently, readers did not know the authenticity of The Protocols had been 

challenged — “the sole discordant voice coming from Marxist critics who reject personal 

explanations of history, such as those relied upon in the Protocols.” 174/ Only one unnamed writer 

denied Arab reliance upon the Protocols, by quoting an Iraqi (news) broadcast on he The 

Protocols, which said they were “às of questionable authenticity,’” 175/ after reporting earlier that 

“the prevailing opinion at the present time is that the Protocols are a forged document.” 176/ Here 

again, no denial of the content nor is the author-entity or content in question here: only the 

authority to publish them, which is a backhanded admission that the publication was as 

represented, but not approved for publication. It supposedly “represented some progress, but 

leaves a number of questions unanswered,” such as who “forged” the document, and what does 

the document represent. It is well worth noting that Mr. Lewis states that 

“[t]here is little to indicate that the forgers were anti-Jewish or and that The 

Protocols were used by the Nazis to justify racist action against the Jews. On the 

contrary, the unwary [i.e.,, the non-Jewish influenced?] reader could be left with 

the impression that if the Protocols were not actually fabricated by the Jews, they 

nevertheless accurately reflect the image which the Zionists hold of themselves 

and which they desire to project to others [i.e, to other Jews as well as to the 

world].” 177/ 

And this is exactly what Henry Ford said long ago, and for which he was compelled — 

supposedly — to apologize. 

Further, in an amazingly complete concord with Nikita Kruschechev, (quoted at n. * on 

the Title Page of this Book), Mr. Lewis states: “Here the writer makes use of a theory which is 

much used in Arabic writings of this kind — that Zionism and anti-Semitism are one and the 

same, that Zionists and anti-Semites are natural allies and collaborators, and thus, whenever the 

one or the other was responsible for the Protocols really makes very little difference.” 178/ 

174 ARABIC PUBLICATIONS OF THE PROTOCOLS. Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, Chp. 8, 

“War Against the Jews,” at p. 208-9, n. 15. This same Dasuqi was also “the author of a booklet 

[Amirika Musta c mara Sahyuniyya (Cairo, 1957)], demonstrating that the United States is a 

colonial dependency of Israel, and not the other way around.” Lewis, id., at Notes, n. 15, p. 271. 

175 AS OF QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY. See: Abdelwahab M. Elmessiri, “Arab views 

on the Protocols,” Foreign Affairs, (April, 1977), 55: 641-642; Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, 

Chp 8, “War Against the Jews,” p. 209, n. 17. 

176 PROTOCOLS BELIEVED A FORGED DOCUMENT. See: Abdelwahab M. Elmessiri, 

Article, in al-Ahram, February 22, 1974; Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, Chp. 8., “War 

Against the Jews,” at p. 209. (Underlined emphasis added). 

177 QUESTIONS UNANSWERED; NO RACIST INDICATIONS. Lewis, id., p. 209. 

178 ZIONISM & ANTI-SEMITISM ARE NATURAL ALLIES. Lewis, Semites &Anti-Semites, 

id., Chp. , “,” at p. 209. A very accurate observation; but consider: to which “writer” is it 

regarding: Mr. Lewis himself?, or the previous Arab author, Mr. Abdelwahab M. Elmessiri, 

quoted above? And, why does Lewis not refute this alleged similarity, rather than merely 

mention it without defense — unless it is true and he cannot deny it? (Ed.). 



Mr. Lewis states that Arabs are not unhappy or disappointed nor turned away from The 

Protocols merely because they are alleged to be a forgery, but because the document projects 

that (Zionist) image of the Jew as possessor of immense hidden powers. This represents a 

danger to Arab morale. It also makes great and attractive “copy” for Arab writers. But when one 

considers the Jew as “a short man with a short-man attitude” of haught, arrogance, bluster and 

intimidation — standing a full five-foot-two, looking down his nose at the world he thinks is 

beneath him, all that Jewish-superiority image flees with the smoke after the curtain is opened 

upon The Wizard of Oz. 

By March, 1970, a newspaper in Lebanon ranked The Protocols at the top of its list for 

“non-fiction” best-sellers, and there has been a rapidly developing, original literature of Arabic 

anti-Semitic design provoked by The Protocols, which are cited and quoted as “authoritative.” 179/ 

Egypt has been the main source of this Protocol-generated, anti-Semitic literature; its 

“Information Department” published and widely distributed across the continent an English 

language pamphlet titled Israel, the Enemy of Africa. The pamphlet quoted directly from The 

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and also from Henry Ford’s The International Jew. 

This was alleged to be the basis for subsequent Arabic criticism of Jews and Judaism, calling all 

Jews “cheats, thieves, and murderers.” 180/ 

Since 1986, this anti-Semite talk had been borne by Libya, Saudi Arabia and even in 

revolutionary Iran. The late King Faisal would always give a copy of The Protocols to every 

visiting foreign minister, diplomats, and other dignitaries, even to the journalists; and all 

consulates and cultural missions set in other countries would distribute this document, all of 

which gave further circulation to this “forgery” whose historical results prove it to be true. 181/ 

On September 29, 1978, The Canberra Times reported a lecture by Pakistani professor 

Qazi at the nation’s capital, Canberra Australia, who said at present, Jews were not just a threat 

to Arabs, but to the whole world. This was not his opinion, it was written; it had been written in 

secret Jewish documents, and the professor later said his source was The Protocols of the Elders 

of Zion. The article’s headline allegedly was: “Jews Threat to Whole World; Professor Hopes 

for Better Understanding.” A publication called Imam, published at the Iranian Embassy in 

London, England, quotes extensively from The Protocols in its issues of 1984 and 1985, 

particularly by the “Islamic Propagation Organization, International Relations Department” of 

Tehran, with editorial-styled “cartoons in the standard manner of East and Middle European 

anti-Semitic ichnography.” The Protocols are said to be openly on sale at the great Mosque in 

London, and probably at many other Muslim mosques. 182/ 

Henry Ford’s “anti-Semitic tract [presumably, the book-session of The International 

Jew], later renounced by its author,” 183/ had been translated into Arabic, and the May-June, 1984 

text was serialized in the Saudi Gazette of Jedda, a widely circulated English language 

179 ARABIC ANTI-SEMITIC LITERATURE. Lewis, id., at p. 210. 

180 

JEWS AS “CHEATS, THIEVES, AND MURDERERS.” Lewis, id., at p. 210. 

181 COPIES TO EVERYONE. Lewis, id., at p. 210. 

182 HEADLINE: “JEWS THREAT TO WHOLE WORLD.” Lewis, id., at p. 210. 

183 

RENOUNCED BY ITS AUTHOR, MR. FORD. Another false statement by Mr. Lewis, id, at 

p. 211. 



newspaper. It had an introductory note “derived from the writings of the well-known Jew-baiter, 

Gerald L.K. Smith.” 184/ 

Part 26. 

AN APPROXIMATE CHRONOLOGY OF APPEARANCES OF 

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION 

A similar Chronology of the Protocols is found in A Lie and a Libel, by 

Richard Levy, and has been somewhat updated by The Compiler & Editor of This 

Book. To complete this present time-frame list, The Compiler & Editor of This 

Annotated Edition has added or deleted information and dates from these 

sequences, as needed and as discovered in the sources shown in the Bibliography. 

Mr. Levy’s sources are often not cited. An asterisk (*) indicates a confirmed or 

easily confirmable detail. — Ed. 

Approx. 1897 to 1899. 

This is alleged to be the most likely year for the writing of The Protocols of the Learned Elders 

of Zion, either while during the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland,* rabbi Herzl 

conducting; or, in Paris (or some other place). Levy suggests Pytor Ivanovich Rachkovsky, the 

head of the Russian secret police (the Okhrana) wrote it at this time. 185/ 

August 26 to September 3, 1903. 

The Protocols (the exact name, i.e., “Learned Elders” or Wise Men” is unknown) was presented 

in a Russian language newspaper, Znamia (or, The Banner), in an abbreviated form by Pavolachi 

Krushevan, publisher. 

1905. 

Sergi Nilus (1862-1930) published his version of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion* 

which is the basis of most other publications. It appeared as an appendix to a greater work, 

Velikoe v Malom (The Great in the Small), “Tzarskoe Selo.” 

1906 to 1907. 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are published again in St. Petersburg, in a book, 

Vragi Roda Chelovecheskago (The Enemies of the Human Race) by G. Butmi, in a 3rd and 4th 

Editions. 

1911 to 1912. 

Sergi Nilus published his The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion edition two more times. 

184 THE WELL-KNOWN JEW-BAITER GERALD L.K. SMITH. See, Lewis, Semites & Anti- 

Semites, Chp. 8, at p. 211. Also, Ernest Wolkman, A Legacy of Hate: Anti-Semitism in America, 

(1982 Franklin Watts, Pub., New York): “Among the most notorious,” at p. 39; also, Legacy of 

Hate, at pp. 110, 132-34. The Reader may be pleased therefore to read Part Two of this 

Protocols book. It contains the complete text of Mr. Smith’s abridged version of The 

International Jew. 

185 RACHKOVSKY. See: A lie and Libel, Levy/Segel, at p. p. xi. 



1917. 

Nilus reveals rabbi Theodor Herzl, the leading Jew and chief rabbi of that day, as the source or 

ultimate àuthor/speaker’ of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

1919. 

Members from “White Russia,” as anti-Bolsheviks, brought typewritten copies of The Protocols 

of the Learned Elders of Zion to the Versailles Peace Conference where nations met to end 

World War I. Copies were given to members of the U.S. (presidential?) cabinet, the U.S. federal 

or state judiciary, and intelligence agencies of unnamed armies and navies. 

1920 to 1922. 

Russian language editions are published in Berlin, New York, Paris and Tokyo. 

1919 to 1920. 

Gottfried zur Beek (a.k.a., Ludwig Muller von Hausen, 1851-1929) published The Protocols of 

the Learned Elders of Zion (exact name?) in the German language, being the first non-Russian 

version. He published 33 editions by 1933. 

May, 1920 to October 1920. 

Henry Ford published articles regarding the Jewish world conspiracy in his Dearborn 

(Michigan) Independent newspaper, referencing often The Protocols of the Learned Elders of 

Zion* 

1920. 

The Protocols and World Revolution is circulated in Boston, Massachusetts. Alleged to be a 

“White Russian adaptation — to what extent, it is not said. 

In England, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion published, titled The Jewish Peril. 

The London Times reviews A disturbing Pamphlet: a Call for Enquiry. 186/ * 

Summer, 1920. 

The London Morning Post prints 18 articles titled The Causes of Unrest.* 

A new translation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is printed by “The Britons, 

supposed to be an anti-semitic organization, after being translated by a Morning Post Russian 

correspondent/reporter, Victor Marsden,* and that edition became the “standard Englishlanguage 

edition.” 

1920. 

The allegedly anti-semitic, French Le Libre Parole prints a complete series of articles on the 

entire The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, while eventually eight translations of it 

appear there by 1938. 

186 CALL FOR ENQUIRY. See Introduction, at Part, THE PROTOCOLS IN PRE-SOVIET 

RUSSIA, at n. JEWS AS SUBJECTS OF A SECRET GOVERNMENT. 



1920. 

Immigrants from Poland in America printed and distribute there — and allegedly in South 

America, where Poles are not numerous — a Polish-language edition of The Protocols of the 

Learned Elders of Zion 

1920 to 1934. 

Only four Polish-language versions of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion circulate in 

Poland. 

1921. 

The first Arabic translation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, appears in 

Damascus. 

Also, an Italian translation is made. 

August 16-18, 1921. 

Philip Graves, a London Times reporter, compares The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

with Maurice Joly’s satire on Napoleon III, titled Dialogue between Machiavelli and 

Montesquiue in Hell (Joly’s work published in Brussels, Belgium, in 1864); thereby alleges to 

have proven The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion to be a “forgery” — but not 

specifically saying it was a parody, plagiaristic effort, nor an intentional misuse. 

1920 to 1921. 

Henry Ford published The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem, in four book 

volumes, reprinting his articles from the Dearborn Independent.* 

1923. 

Theodor Fritsch, an alleged German anti-semite, published a second German language 

translation, based on the English version, Fritsch is said to sell 100,000 copies of this The 

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion by 1933. 

Also, Alfred Rosenberg, a follower and early associate of Adolph Hitler, and described as the 

“philosopher” of the National Socialist party, authors The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and 

Jewish World Policy, which is reprinted three times in that year. 

June 30, 1927. 

Henry Ford allegedly “retracts” and “apologizes” for The International Jew articles and book 

publications. Ford reportedly blamed his subordinates for the Work, and agrees to cease 

publishing it. 

1927. 

In Germany, Herr Fritsch continues to print The International Jew. 

1929 

In Germany, the National Socialist Party obtains the publishing rights to The Protocols of the 

Learned Elders of Zion for zur Beek’s translation. 



1933. 

The Rumanian parliament has excerpts from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion read 

into its minutes of the meeting. This is then used by Rumanian Fascists to demand the expulsion 

of all Jews from their land. 

1934 to 1937. 

A “trial” is conducted in Port Elizabeth, South Africa where The Protocols of the Learned Elders 

of Zion is declared a “forgery.” 

Another court, in Bern, Switzerland, opines The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion to be a 

fraudulent plagiarism of Jolly’s book, mentioned above. 

1936 to 1937. 

In Brazil, some Portuguese language translations of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

are circulated. 

November, 1939. 

Distribution of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in other countries is alleged to be 

suggested by Adolph Hitler, to demonstrate that Jews and Freemasons are the co-conspirators of 

world domination. 

December, 1939. 

In Spain, the “Falangists (a religious sect) published and circulated in a timely manner Spanish 

language editions of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, just before Spain’s General 

Franco’s New Year’s Day speech, which attacked Jews and Freemasons. 

1957 to 1959. 

In Egypt, Brutukul Hukmama’ Sahyun (or, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion), and al-Shuyu 

ìyya wa-al Sahuniyya (or, Communism and Zionism) are published and circulated, after 

Egyptian military actions took control of the Suez Canal and fought off an Israeli invasion. 

1964. 

A “deluxe” version or edition of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was published in 

Spain. No details are known on what it entailed. 

August, 1967. 

The Soviet/Russian newspaper Pravda and many rural newspapers print on the same day an 

article titled, “What is Zionism?” and is the start of a Soviet anti-Zionist campaign, using The 

Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as some of its basis. 

1968. 

300,000 copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is published by the Islamic 

Institute of Beirut, Lebanon, in French, Italian, Spanish and Arabic. 

1972. 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is used to prompt Catholic Church reforms 

regarding Jewry in “Vatican II.” 



Italian newspaper, Ordino Nuovo, alleged to be a neo-Fascist publication, prints “a new edition” 

of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. 

The Spanish language Los Protocolos de los Sabios de Sion y la Subversion Mundial is 

associated with the “Andinia plot,” said to be “an alleged Zionist attempt” to found a Jewish 

nation-state in Argentina. 

1974. 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are published in Bombay, India, titled International 

Conspiracy Against Indians. 

1977. 

In America, a National States Rights Party announces by advertisements in its newsletter, The 

Thunderbolt, three separate editions of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, including 

one enlarged (“super-large”) edition with commentaries by Henry Ford. 

1987. 

In Japan, the first edition of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is published titled 

Yudayajin to Kuremurin: futatsu no Giteisho. 

1992. 

A Russian extremist group. Pamyat, published The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion at an 

undisclosed place, presumably in post-Soviet Russia. 

1994. 

Christian Fundamentalists in Australia publish The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are published in Bulgaria, as part of a book titled 

Freemasons, Jews, and Revolutions: How These Forces of Satan Are Preparing the End of 

Mankind. 

June, 1996, August, 2009. 

This present edition/version of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, with Annotations, 

Historical Facts, etc., and accompanied by Henry Ford’s The International Jew (abridged by 

Gerald L.K. Smith), published in America. 

Part 27. 

A REVIEW OF LOCAL NEWSPAPER ARTICLES 

USING REFERENCE TO “THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION” 

(From 1992 through early 1996) 

A search of “CD-ROM” styled information on computer programs at a local county 

library where the Editor lived in June, 1996, produced the following list of articles or editorials 

which referred to or used The Protocols of Zion (or as otherwise titled) as an example. None of 

these citations were favorable; all of them were the usual twisting of the truth, stretching the 

imagination of the Knowledgeable, or inventing, as easily seen by The Reader of This Book 

when solemnly contemplating The Protocols and the intent and conduct of its Adherents. 



Unless otherwise indicated below, the Protocols-related comments were found in The 

San Diego Union-Tribune, (S.D. Union-Tribune), a Copley Press publication — and the only 

“major” newspaper in that city. The Union-Tribune seems to offer too often a Jewish-oriented 

attitude and editorial policy, and defers to Jewish sympathies to become an informational 

dissemination source of as yet proven Holocaust — by not relying upon, or rejecting prior to 

publication, the undisputable, confirmed facts and evidence sufficient plainly available to 

withstand any “courtroom” review of the truth of that Holocaust matter; and, by publishing other 

unfounded and/or subtly anti-Christian articles. Therefore, pro-Protocols articles will never 

appear in that newspaper. It is interesting to note also that all or most all of these “reporters” are 

Jewish. (Ed.). 

These are the articles found, with their authors and sources: 

1992 

“...the demons of democracy187/ who sell anti-semitic literature line Protocols of the 

Learned Elders of Zion..in Moscow’s underpasses.” 

See: “A poet’s high praise for Russia’s last czar,” Andrie Voznesensky (Russian poet), in 

an essay for Time Magazine while he visited New York. S.D. Union-Tribune, January 6, 

1992, Opinion page, B-7. 

1993 

“...manufactured paranoia as the Protocols of Zion, Hitler’s favorite...still distributed by 

Muslims in the Middle East and on 42nd Street in New York City.” 

See: “The Alchemists of hate and murder,” A.M. Rosenthal, S.D. Union-Tribune, March 

3, 1993, Opinion, B-8. 

“The Protocols of Zion” as “a ninety-year old book.” 

See: “Russia rules anti-semitic tract a fraud,” Michael A. Hiltzik, Los Angeles Times, 

November 28, 1993, p. A-1. 

“...the infamous Protocols of Zion, the forgeries beloved of anti-semites everywhere...” 

See: “Rushdie: not simply culture clash,” James Goldsborough, S.D. Union-Tribune, 

December 6, 1993, Opinion page. 

1994 

“embraced the hairiest of anti-semite canards, including the notorious Czarist-era 

forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion...” also, 

“In America, not even an anti-semite can be an anti-semite.” 

See: “Worms of hate in a dapper package,” Richard Cohen, S.D. Union-Tribune, 

February 5, 1994, Opinion, p. B-6. 

187 THE DEMONS OF DEMOCRACY. What a strange — and misleading — statement for a 

Jew to make, when “[d]emocracy, too, was at the bottom dear to the Jewish heart.” Gottheil, 

Zionism, Chp. V., “The Jewish Congress,” p. 109. 

“Democracy” — which is nothing more than its historical label: mob-rule — is touted by 

all newspaper editors all across the “western” world as the ideal government. History shows no 

nation ever successfully surviving “democracy.” (Ed.). 



1995 

“...a mischievously manufactured plot for the collapse of Christian society and 

establishment of Jewish world domination. Such fables are not passed along purely for 

amusement.” 

See: “Don’t make cabbage into sauerkraut,” Lionel Van Deerlin (a former San Diego 

area state assemblyman and regular Opinion-contributor), S.D. Union-Tribune, January 6, 

1995, Editorial/Opinion, p. B-5 

(This Canadian issue’s text is not immediately available). 

See: “This Lie will not die,” (Author Unknown), Reader’s Digest (Canadian edition) 188/ 

June, 1995, p. 57. 

“...Henry Ford’s Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion...” 

See: Lifestyle, S.D. Union-Tribune, June 19, 1995, Theater section, p. D-4. 

================================================= 

S E C T I O N T W O 

Section Two is devoted to more recent “history,” as it concerns first, two brief 

biographies of Henry Ford, Sr., and Gerald L.K. Smith. 

Ford is discussed because of that famous “apology” he is said to have made to Jewry, 

regarding the publications of The International Jew, which has some flaws regarding the 

sincerity of the entire incident; Smith was the Editor of the abridged version of Ford’s Work 

discussed above, and Smith’s book is similarly titled as The International Jew. Because Smith’s 

name appears on that abridged document, and he because was a secondary player in the Ford 

experience, his impact has been recounted. 

Part 1. 

A BRIEF, RELEVANT BIOGRAPHY OF HENRY FORD 189/ AS IT 

RELATES TO THE INTERNATIONAL JEW “APOLOGY”-INCIDENT 

[The following is a briefly edited reprint of an “Introduction” 

placed in a Christian Nationalist Crusade book titled, The 

188 READER’S DIGEST, (CANADIAN EDITION). As of the publication date of This Book, the 

nation of Canada has unfortunately a most favorable climate for pro-Jewish rhetoric, yet more 

than a few anti-Jewish, usually Christian, people have suffered “criminal” prosecution for their 

statements and writings about Jews, Judaism, and exposing the lack of evidence — and therefore 

the total fraud — of “The Holocaust-Gassing-of-Jews” in Germany, etc. The Compiler & 

Editor of This Book is therefore concerned — somewhat — about the sale and oratory required 

to be accomplished in Canada regarding This Book’s promotion. (Ed.). 

189 A BRIEF BIO OF FORD. Derived in great part from The International Jew, abridged by 

Gerald L.K. Smith, Nat’l Dir., Christian Nationalist Crusade, (Los Angeles, No Pub. Date; c. 

1941, 1965), hardback ed., 231 pages. 



International Jew, which is an abridgement by Gerald L.K. Smith 

or his followers, of the greater 4 volume series published by Henry 

Ford titled The International Jew, which appeared in the 

newspaper articles of The Dearborn Independent. Mr. Smith’s 

work is a 223-page hardback edition. Ed.] 190/ 

At the apex of his business career, Henry Ford, the innovative automobile manufacturer 

and industrial genius, sensed that a terrific effort was being made to take his very profitable 

business from him and to manipulate it into the hands of the well known Biblical reference 

anonymously called the “money-changers” — i.e., those often unknown individuals working 

unseen and in concert with others of their Kind to acquire the property of others by means 

unChristian and unjust. Mr. Ford had the impression then, and all history supports his 

conclusions nor, that these manipulations were being engineered and executed by seemingly 

powerful Jewish financiers. 

Mr. Ford called to his office the most intelligent research men within his acquaintance. 

He commissioned them to make a thorough study of the so-called “inter-nation-al Jew,” and to 

thereafter publish their findings in The Dearborn Independent, which at that time was the official 

organ of the Ford Motor Company. With Ford’s backing, the project had no budgetary 

constraints; no expense was spared, and it is estimated that literally millions of dollars — in the 

money-values of the early 1920’s — had been spent by Mr. Ford to arrive at the result of his 

Work, The International Jew. The original articles were published Ford’s newspaper, then 

published in book form. 

When the final report on “The International Jew” was originally published, it opened 

each chapter with a text taken from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, or from the 

published statements of world-prominent Jews. The moment the manuscripts dealing with the 

190 A GOOD BIOGRAPHY. Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did 

their fathers to the false prophets. Jesus of Nazareth. The Gospel According to Luke, (KJV) Chp 

6:26. Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. Antisthenes. Quoted in The New 

Dictionary of Thoughts, A Cyclopedia of Quotations (Being a Digest of Striking Thoughts from 

the Master Minds of the World Begun Over Ninety Years Ago and covering a Period of Over 

Four Thousand Years), Tryon Edwards, D.D., ed. (New York, Standard Book Company, 

MCMXXXVI, 1955), “Enemies,” at p. 160. 

Our enemies come nearer to the truth in the opinions they form of us than we do in our 

opinion of ourselves. Rochefoucould, id., p. 161. 

Our enemies frequently tell the truth, but friends, never. Cato. id., p. 161. 

No department of literature is so false as a biography. Channing. id., “Biography,” at p. 

49 

If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each man’s life 

sorrow and suffering, enough to disarm all hostility. Longfellow. A Dictionary of Thoughts, p. 

160. 

If you have no enemies, it is a sign fortune has forgot you. Thomas Fuller (1654-1734), 

Gnomologia. Quoted in Dictionary of Quotations, Bergen Evans, ed. (New York, Avenel Books, 

MCMLXVIII), “Enemies,” p. 198, at No. 11. 

Reputation is not worth defending, but righteousness is. Dagobert D. Runes, Dictionary 

of Thought, From my Writings and My Evenings (New York, Philosophical Library, 1959), p. 95. 



Jewish Question reached the public, a terrific howl went up from official Jewry. 191/ If it could be 

summarized, the campaign of reprisal and abuse which was carried on against Mr. Ford and his 

Motor Company that summary alone would require a book-seized publication. Every instrument 

of torture and abuse which could be imagined was carried on against Mr. Ford. Smear, character 

assassination, ridicule, physical threat, business and personal boycott, and more. The pressure 

was constant, consistent, and endless. The most powerful and enigmatic pressures imaginable 

were brought to bear upon Mr. Ford to stop the publication of “The International Jew” 

newspaper series. Finally, the order came from the Ford office to cease publication and to 

destroy the copies which were available. Jews and others went into the bookstores and bought 

and destroyed all copies which could be found. It has been suggested that sneak thieves were 

commissioned by the Jewish controllers to visit libraries and steal the newspapers and other 

reports from the archives of these libraries. 192/ This made the book so rare and unfindable that it 

had become a collector’s item, at least. 

The inability of any earnest seeker to find the publication, whether as a public library 

possession of the relevant editions of The Dearborn Independent or as the present editor 

confirms that, by searching the many libraries in some of the largest public libraries in Southern 

California. Even though many public libraries have listings of The Protocols of the Learned 

Elders of Zion in their (computerized) card catalogue, no such publications are actually found on 

the bookshelf of any of those libraries. How many private libraries — perhaps like that of The 

Reader of This Book, is unknown, but most likely more plentiful then the Jews prefer. 

The day finally came when the one ambition of the Jews was fulfilled. Mr Ford 

“apologized” for publishing “The International Jew.” using the uncharacteristic means of 

blaming his subordinates for the supposed dastardly deed. 

It is the allegation of Gerald L.K. Smith, National Director of the Christian Nationalist 

Crusade, that Smith had interviewed Henry Ford in 1940. Mr. and Mrs Ford invited Mr. Smith 

and his wife to be the guests of the Fords during an automobile ceremony at Dearborn, 

Michigan. On that occasion, Henry Ford told Mr. Smith “the whole story.” Mr. Ford gave to 

Mr. Smith “a sensational and shocking report. He said: `Mr. Smith, my apology for publishing 

“The International Jew” was given great publicity, but I did not sign that apology. It was signed 

by Harry Bennett.’” 193/ 

Harry Bennett was a very officious and aggressive employee of The Ford Motor 

Company. He presumed his way into the confidence of Mr. Ford and later became known as an 

enigmatic and obnoxious personality. For a certain period of time, Bennett exerted virtually a 

dictatorial control over the affairs of the Company. 

191 DEALING WITH THE JEWISH QUESTION. “The Jewish Question cannot be solved by 

tolerance.” From the speeches/writings of Leo N. Levi, as president of the B’nai B’rith, c. 1900, 

reprinted in a B’nai B’rith memorial to Mr. Levi. p. 98; quoted by Ford, The Int’l Jew, Vol III, 

“Jewish influences in American Life,” Chp. LV., “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 

170; Dearborn Independent, May 14, 1921. 

192 SNEAK THIEVES. Introduction, of Smith, The International Jew, at p. 6. 

193 BENNETT SIGNED THE APOLOGY. Smith, The International Jew, (Ford, Abridged), p. 6; 

see also, Bennett, We Never Called Him Henry, (New York, Faucett Books, 1951), at p. 56, cited 

by Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, Chp. 4, “Ford Re-Tractor,” p. 78. 



Mr. Smith said that when Henry Ford told him that he (Ford) had not signed the apology, 

he “could scarcely believe [his] own ears.” On the occasion of that visit, Mr. Ford said to Smith: 

“`Mr. Smith, I hope to republish “The International Jew” again some time.’ He [Ford] showed 

no signs of regret for having published it.” 194/ 

The original “apology” had been so thoroughly publicized at the time that it would be 

difficult to make people believe what was heard uttered from Henry Ford’s own lips. 

It is said by Mr. Smith that after Henry Ford died, Harry Bennett evidently was very 

much disillusioned and embittered by his not being included in the sharing of the Ford 

inheritance. He collaborated with a Jewish writer, Paul Marucs, to produce a Book titled We 

Never Called Him Henry. 195/ 

Here, in his own words, is Bennett’s representations concerning the much publicized 

“apology” Henry Ford was supposed to have made for exposing the machinations of the “internation-al” 

Jew. Bennett’s story appeared in an abbreviated from in True Magazine: 196/ 

I [Henry Bennett] got in touch with Arthur Brisbane 197/ , and through him learned that the 

American Jewish Committee 198/ could settle the matter. I entered into negotiations with 

Samuel Untermeyer 199/ and Louis Marshall 200/ of that organization, and with Brisbane. 

194 

FORD’s INTENT TO REPUBLISH THE PROTOCOLS. Smith, id, at p. 7; also, Lee, Henry 

Ford & the Jews, p. 111. 

195 

WE NEVER CALLED HIM HENRY. Bennett, by that title, (New York, Faucett Books, 1951). 

196 

TRUE MAGAZINE. October, 1951, p. 125. 

197 

ARTHUR BRISBANE. Brisbane (1864-1936) was among the earliest, the highest paid, and 

certainly the most influential syndicated (i.e., of specialty articles, often with same-day, nationwide 

publication) newspaper columnists in America, working for Pulitzer (New York World) and 

later, for Wm R. Hearst (New York Evening Journal). (World Book Encycl. (1973), Vol 2, p. 

502). 

Brisbane in some circles was considered “the eminent American writer and editor.” 

What Mrs. [Mary Baker] Eddy Said to Arthur Brisbane: the Celebrated Interview of the Eminent 

Journalist with the Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science (Boston, M.E. Paige Pub., 

1930), “Introduction,” by Rufus Steele, p. 5; see also, ARTICLE IN MAGAZINE. 

Brisbane’s propensities to act contrary to the best interests of non-Jewish Americans in 

particular and Christian in general were uncovered in Henry Ford’s The International Jew,” Vol. 

I, “The World’s Foremost Problem,” Chapter VII, “Brisbane Leaps to the Help of Jewry,” p. 77- 

84 (Liberty Bell Pub. reprint, May, 1976, 4 vol.); and, Dearborn (Mich.) Independent, July 3, 

1920. Brisbane’s joining with Jewry to compel Ford’s “apology” may have been prompted by 

Ford’s newspaper article (later the book chapter) that particularly connected Brisbane with the 

Jewish Problem. 

198 AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE. This Committee is “organized to defend against 

outbreaks of anti-Semitism” through immediate mobilization. Isaacs, Jews in American Politics, 

Chp. IV, “Modern Scribes-Intellectuals in the media,” p. 52. 

199 SAMUEL UNTERMEYER. Samuel Untermeyer was ... . [Source, cite needed] 

200 LOUIS MARSHALL. Louis Marshall was at the time president of the American Jewish 

Committee. (Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, Chp. 4, Ford’s RE-Tractor,” p. 79); Marshall was a 

Jewish labor activist, etc. See, Sachar, The Course of Modern Jewish History, pp. 331, 354; 



They drew up the now-famous “apology,” which was to be the basis for a settlement. In 

this formal statement, it was said that Mr. ford would see to it that no more anti-Semitic 

material circulated in his name and he would call in all undistributed copies of “The 

International Jew,” which were booklet reprints of the [Dearborn] Independent’s articles. 

For the rest, the “apology” said that Mr. Ford had no knowledge of what had been 

published in the Dearborn Independent, and was “shocked” and “mortified” to learn 

about it. 

Arthur Brisbane brought this statement 201/ to me [Bennett] at 1710 Broadway. I phoned 

up Mr. Ford. I told him an “apology” had been drawn up, and added: “It’s pretty bad, 

Mr. Ford.” I tried to read it to him over the phone, but he stopped me. 

So I signed Mr. Ford’s signature to the document. I had always been able to sign his 

name as realistically as he [Ford] could himself. I sent the statement to Untermeyer and 

Marshall. The signature was verified, 202/ and the case was closed. [Continued on this 

Book’s next page.] 

member, Jewish Agency for Palestine, p. 378, 521-22; also, Encycl. Jud., etc. 

Marshall is said to have “persuaded the gullible and uninformed industrialist, Henry 

Ford, to cease publication of the Dearborn Independent, and to repudiate its anti-Semitic 

editorials...an achievement which gave Marshall extraordinary standing and prestige among his 

fellow Jews. Jews jestingly remarked: Àmerican Jewry lives under `Marshall Law.’” Sachar, 

id, at p. 521. 

This power of Marshall to control — not the average Jew, but the “international Jew,” 

can be seen: “By order of Louis Marshall, the American Jewish Committee and the B’nai B’rith, 

[all of] American Jewry has muffled the calculated furioso of its outcry and contents itself with 

occasional yelps.” Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. IV., “Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States,” 

Chp. LXXIII., “Jews Are Silent, the National Voice is Heard,” p. 143. See also, Ford, Int’l Jew, 

id., Vol. IV, Chp. LXXVI., “America’s Jewish Enigma — Louis Marshall,” at p. 177. 

201 ARTHUR BRISBANE BROUGHT THIS STATEMENT. See also: Lee, Henry Ford & the 

Jews, Chp. 4, “Ford’s Re-Tractor,” p. 79. 

202 SIGNATURE VERIFIED. “Verified” by Bennett’s showing Louis Marshall the alleged 

`Ford signature.’ Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, Chp. 4, “Ford Re-Tractor,” p. 79. 

And a signature confirmed by whom else, if not Bennett himself, the only one who could 

have such knowledge? Henry Ford does not confirm that “verification.” (Ed.). 



All this was done without Mr. Ford’s taking anyone else into his confidence. 203/ Edsel 204/ 

knew nothing about it, and Cameron 205/ and Senator Reed 206/ heard about it [about the 

“apology”] by reading in the newspapers. 

Cameron’s reaction was quoted by the newspapers: “It’s all news to me and I cannot 

believe it is true.” 207/ 

________________________________________ 

The Reader might reconsider the facts in this manner: 

1. The newspapers and other “medias” of the time quoted Henry Ford as apologizing for 

the publication of “The International Jew.” 

2. Henry Ford told Gerald L.K. Smith, in the presence of Mr. Ernest Liebold, his 

personal secretary for 34 years, Mrs. Henry Ford, and Mrs. G.L.K. Smith that Ford himself said 

that he (Ford) did not sign the purported “apology,” and that, Ford looked forward to 

republishing “The International Jew” again. 

3. Bennett, who at one time was one of the three most powerful individuals powerful 

individuals in the Ford Motor Company at that time, admits that Henry Ford did not sigh the 

“apology,” but that Bennett signed that “apology,”and that this supposed signature was the only 

one which appeared on the formal “apology.” 

4. And further, that Bennett signed Ford’s signature with such accuracy that — when we 

apply the “forgery” definitions discussed in the “Introduction” of This Book of this book — the 

alleged “Ford” signature caused the Jewish demandants for that “apology” to believe the 

signature was that of Henry Ford, when in fact it was not. 

Concerning The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Henry Ford said on February 

17, 1921, “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is 

going on...They have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” 208/ 

203 NO ONE ELSE IN FORD’S CONFIDENCE. By stating that, Bennett provides the 

“protection talk” he needed to be free of retribution. If no one else was aware of Ford’s 

“signature,” nor of Bennett’s forging “Ford signature,” who would be able to prove any true 

“signature” ever existed. Here is a perfect example of a “forgery” which the anti-Protocols 

people can really recognize: a reproduction, perpetrated upon Jewry, intended to convince the 

recipients that it was genuine — it looked just like Ford’s signature, “exactly” — just like The 

Protocols look just like the original — exactly. We can easily find a Ford “original signature,” 

for comparison; the problem is, where is the “original Protocols, for any comparison? (Ed.). 

204 EDSEL. Edsel Bryant Ford (1983-1943), Henry Ford’s son, and later president of Ford 

Company from 1919-1943. After Edsel’s death, Henry Ford resumed that office until his own 

death in 1947. Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, id. 

205 CAMERON. [bio. sources....]. 

206 SENATOR REED. [bio sources....]. 

207 CAMERON QUOTE. [quote & cite of newspaper, etc.]. 

208 THEY FIT IT NOW.” See Smith, the International Jew, Introduction, p. 9. 



It must be observed that when Ford made this statement concerning the Protocols in 

relationship to his publication “The International Jew,” this document, which is allegedly the 

secret minutes of the Elders of Zion, was only 16 years old by the time Ford published articles 

about them. The Jews had advertised to the world that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of 

Zion were forgeries. Ford wasted no time arguing this question. He merely said: i.e., no matter 

what they are, they accurately describe what is going on today in social, economic, and political 

circumstances. 

In his book titled My Life and Work, 209/ Henry Ford commented on his “The International 

Jew” newspaper series: 

Readers of our articles will see at once that we are not actuated by any kind of prejudice, 

except it may be a prejudice in favor of the principles which have made our civilization. 

There had been observed in this country certain streams of influence which were causing 

a marked deterioration in out literature, amusements, and social conduct; business was 

departing from its old-time substantial soundness; a general letting-down of standards 

were felt everywhere. It was not the robust coarseness of the white man, the rude 

indelicacy, say of Shakespeare characters, but a nasty Orientalism which has insidiously 

affected every channel of expression — and to such an extent that it was time to 

challenge it. The fact that these influences are all traceable to one racial source is a fact 

to he reckoned with...Our work does not pretend to say the last word on the Jew in 

America. It says only the word which describes his present impress on this country. 

When that impress is changed, the report can be changed...Our opposition is only to 

ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina of the people. These ideas 

proceed from the easily identified sources, that are promulgated by the easily 

discoverable methods and they are controlled by mere exposure. 

When people learn to identify the source and nature of the influence swirling around 

them. that is sufficient. Let the American people once understand that it is not natural 

degeneracy but calculated subversion that afflicts us, and they are safe. 

The explanation is the cure. This work [The International Jew — The World’s Foremost 

Problem] was taken up without personal motives. When it reached a stage where we 

believed the American people could grasp the key, we let it rest for the time. Our 

enemies say that we began it for revenge and that we laid it down in fear. Time will 

show that our critics [the jews] are merely dealing in evasion because they dare not tackle 

the main question. 

No mature-minded thinker — in fact, no honest reader, could question Henry Ford’s 

logic as summarized above. All that America and the free world needs is to “know is the truth, 

and that very truth shall set us free.” 210/ 

209 MY LIFE AND WORK, BY HENRY FORD. CITE INFO., with author Samuel Crowther; See 

also, Today and Tomorrow (19 — ) and Moving Forward (19 — ). World Book Encycl. (1973), 

Vol 7, p. 324. 

210 THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE. The Gospel According to John, Chapter 8:32. 



HENRY FORD’S (NON-) “APOLOGY” TO THE JEWS 

In America of 1917-21, the Protocols were widely circulated under the title of The Jewish 

Peril 211/ and this was particularly publicized and distributed by the automobile magnate, Henry 

Ford Sr. Ford has been described by his Jewish detractors as being “an obsessive anti-Semite.” 

Ford is also alleged to have admitted that his own accusations were unfounded [Lewis, at 109.] 

This “apology” reference is apparently to the supposed type-written and hand-signed “Apology” 

by Ford to certain Jews for his publishing the Dearborn Independent newspaper series, “The 

International Jew,” as described in this Introduction — and an apology which Henry Ford said he 

had not made. 212/ 

THE TEXT OF HENRY FORD’S (NON-)”APOLOGY” 

Arthur Brisbane is alleged to have been a “journalist friend of Ford’s who had been 

critical of Ford’s anti-semitism.” 213/ And yet, Brisbane says he remembers what Henry Ford told 

him about Ford’s own opinions of the Jews, which Brisbane repeated at a press conference for 

the public release of Ford’s “apology” to the Jews: 

Nobody can accuse me [Henry Ford] of being hostile to the Jewish people as a 

race. I employ thousands of them. They include many of my ablest associates. 

This building, which I believe to be the finest of its kind in the world, was built 

for me by Albert Kahn, Jewish architect here in Detroit, a man in my opinion with 

no superior. 

You know about the Wayside Inn which I bought in New England to 

perpetuate it interesting memories. I wanted to have it refurnished with authentic 

furniture of the correct periods, tried various dealers, not Jewish, and could not 

get what I wanted. I then asked a Jewish dealer in Boston, Mr. Saks, to do the 

work for me and he has done it for me ever since, satisfactorily and honorably. 

I am hostile to concerns that seek to control others and make money hard 

to get, no matter what their race or religion, but I am not hostile to Jews. 214/ 

211 Another title: The Jewish Peril. Lewis, ==, Chp. , “,” at p. 109. 

212 HENRY FORD’S “APOLOGY.” See, Gerald L.K. Smith, The International Jew (Ford, 

Abridged Ed.) at pp. 7-9. A reproduction of Smith’s The International Jew is accompanying This 

Book, as “Book Four.” See also, this Book One — Introduction, regarding Smith and Henry 

Ford. (Book Four is not included with this Protocols of Zion Book at this time. Ed.). 

213 BRISBANE CRITICAL OF FORD. Albert Lee, Henry Ford and the Jews (New York, Stein 

& Day, 1980), chp. 4, “Ford’s Re-Tractor,” p. 79. Mr. Lee is a former Ford Motor Co. 

employee, in the “publicity” department, presenting “a fair minded discussion of Ford’s antisemitism.” 

Lee, id., at p. 45, n. 6. 

214 BRISBANE SPEAKS WARMLY OF FORD. Albert Lee, Henry Ford and the Jews, chp. 4, 

“Ford Re-Tractor,” p. 79-80. Lee cites no source in support of this text. Ford had an “economic 

anti-semitism,” said Mme. Schimmer. Lee, id., p. 155. 



At the same press conference, Brisbane delivered what was alleged to be a statement on 

Ford’s behalf, speaking “warmly” of Ford and saying Brisbane himself did not believe Ford was 

a racist. 

This is one version of the “apology,” found in a Jewish-favored book: 

For some time past I have given consideration to the series of articles concerning 

Jews which since 1920 have appeared in the Dearborn Independent. Some of 

them have been reprinted in pamphlet form under the title The International Jew. 

Although public publications are my property, it goes without saying that in the 

multitude of my activities it has been impossible for me to devote personal 

attention to their management or to keep informed as to their contents. It has 

therefore inevitably followed that the conduct and policies of publications had to 

be delegated to men whom I placed in charge of them and upon whom I relied 

implicitly. 

To my great regret I have learned that Jews generally, and particularly 

those of this country, not only resent these publications as promoting anti- 

Semitism, but regard me as their enemy. Trusted friends with whom I have 

conferred recently have assured me in al sincerity that in their opinion the 

character of the charges and insinuations made against the Jews, both individually 

and collectively, contained in many articles which have been circulated 

periodically in the Dearborn Independent, and have been reprinted in the 

pamphlets mentioned, justifies the righteous and indignation entertained by Jews 

everywhere toward me because of the mental anguish occasioned by the 

unprovoked reflections made upon them. 

This has led me to direct my personal attention to the subject, in order to 

ascertain the exact nature of these articles. As a result of this survey I confess I 

am deeply mortified that this journal, which is intended to be constructive and not 

destructive, has been made the medium for resurrecting exploded fictions, for 

giving currency to the so-called Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, which have 

been demonstrated, as I Learn, to be gross forgeries, 215/ and for contending that 

the Jews have been engaged in a conspiracy to control the capital and the 

industries of the world, besides laying at their door many offenses against 

decency, public order, and good morals. 

Had I appreciated even the general nature, to say nothing of the details, of 

these utterances, I would have forbidden their circulation without a moment’s 

hesitation....I deem it my duty as an honorable man to make amends for the wrong 

done to the Jews as fellow-men and brothers, by asking their forgiveness for the 

harm that I have unintentionally committed, by retracting so far as lies within my 

power the offensive charges laid at their door by these publications, and by giving 

215 THE PROTOCOLS AS GROSS FORGERIES. See the comments herein on “Forgery” and its 

usages by Jews, and its legal definition, in the INTRODUCTION of This Book. (Ed.). 



them the unqualified assurance that henceforth they may look to me for friendship 

and good will. 216/ 

After that statement, which was printed in many newspapers as well as in the Dearborn 

Independent, Ford settled the lawsuit brought against him by Sapiro for an estimated 140,000.00 

(in 1928 dollar-values). After reading that statement, Louis Marshall, the Jewish leader to whom 

the “apology” was delivered, 217/ said, “If I had his money, I would not make such a humiliating 

statement for one hundred million dollars.” 218/ This, said by a Jew, when the A.D. 1928-values 

of “one hundred million dollars” was a tremendous amount of money, then and now. 

Later, Richard Gutstadt, Director of the Anti-Defamation League, was asked to prepare 

another letter for Mr. Ford to sign, which Ford did. This is the text of Gutstadt’s script: 

In our present national and international emergency, I consider it of importance 

that I clarify some general misconceptions concerning my attitude toward my 

fellow-citizens of the Jewish faith. I do not subscribe to or support, directly or 

indirectly, any agitation which would promote antagonism against my Jewish 

fellow-citizens. I consider that the hate-mongering prevalent for some time in 

this country against the Jew, is of distinctive disservice to our country, and to the 

peace and welfare of humanity. 

At the time of the retraction by me of certain publications concerning the Jewish 

people, in pursuance of which I ceased [sic] the literature prepared by certain 

persons connected with its publication. Since that time I have been giving no 

permission or sanction to anyone to use my name as sponsoring any such 

publication, or being the accredited author thereof. 

I am convinced that there is no greater dereliction among the Jews than there is 

among any other class of citizens. I am convinced, further, that agitation for the 

creation of hate against the Jew or any other racial or religious group, had been 

utilized to divide our American community and to weaken our nationality. 

I strongly urge all my fellow-citizens to give no aid to any movement whose 

purpose it is to arouse hatred against any group. It is my sincere hope that now in 

this country and throughout the world, when this war [the Second World War] is 

finished and peace once more established, hatred of the Jew, commonly known as 

216 THE SUPPOSED “APOLOGY” OF HENRY FORD. Albert Lee, Henry Ford and the Jews, 

chp. 4, “Ford’s Re-Tractor,” p. 80-81. Lee cites no source for this “apology” text. 

217 

LOUIS MARSHALL, THE JEWISH LEADER. For more info., see note: LOUIS 

MARSHALL, below. 

218 I WOULD NOT MAKE SUCH A HUMILIATING STATEMENT. Albert Lee, Henry Ford 

and the Jews (New York, Stein & Day, 1980), chp. 4, “Ford’s Re-Tractor,” p. 79 and Lee’s n. 

27. 



anti-Semitism, and hatred against any other racial or religious group, shall cease 

for all time. 219/ 

It is said that this second apology, or follow-up apology, did not do much, and there was 

doubts as to whether Ford really was sincere or honest here than when Ford made the 1927 

retraction or the Franklin letter of 1938. 

But neither of those statements was no apology. Read very carefully, Ford merely said 

that if his publicly reporting on the acts of the “International Jews” had brought troubles upon 

the innocent, non-“International Jews” then Ford was unhappy about it; Ford never accused all 

Jewry of being “International Jews”, he merely reported that these minority-within-a-minority 

Jews’ anti-American, anti-world, and maybe anti-Jewry conduct. The Reader, when actually 

studying Ford’s newspaper articles and/or his 4 volume work, The International Jew, will find 

absolutely no reference to all Jewry as being the co-conspirators against the non-Jewish world; 

rather, there is in fact a very careful dissecting of the “International Jew” problem from the 

“Jewish Question.” Ford never insulted the common Jew; he and his writers went out of their 

war, many times, to correct any thoughts of prejudice against the common Jew. The common 

Jew may take offense at the attack upon one of their own Jewish kind, but never were the Jewsat-large 

attacked, because there was no cause to do so. Here, we find some proof, quoting from 

Ford’s The International Jew: 

To the pro-Jewish spokesmen who have filled the air with cries of “lies” and 

“slander,” to these self-appointed guardians of “American ideals” who rule out 

with rare finality all these who would dare suggest that possibly there is a hidden 

side of the Jewish Question, it must come as something of a jolt to be reminded 

that in this series [Ford’s The International Jew] there is scarcely a line that is 

without high Jewish authority. 220/ 

The time is coming for American Jewry to slough off the leadership which 

has let it [all of Jewry] and left it [all of Jewry] in the bog. [Jewish] Leadership 

knows that. Indeed, it is amazing to discover the number of indications that the 

attempts made to suppress The Dearborn Independent [newspaper articles] have 

been made principally to prevent the Jews reading it. The leaders do not care how 

many non-Jews read these articles; but they do not desire their own people to read 

them. The Jewish leaders do not desire their people’s eyes to be opened. 221/ 

All Jews are not rich controllers of wealth. There are poor Jews aplenty, 

though most of them even in poverty are their own masters. While it is true that 

the chief financial controllers of the country are Jews, it is not true that every Jew 

219 FORD’S SECOND “APOLOGY.” See: Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, Chp. 6, “Ford Final 

Thrust,” p. 135, citing at n. 46, Nathan C. Belth, A Promise to Keep: A Narrative of the 

American Encounter with Anti-Semitism (New York, Time Books, 1979) pp. 82-84. 

220 SCARCELY A LINE WITHOUT HIGH JEWISH AUTHORITY. See: Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. 

III, Jewish Influences in American Life, Chp. LV., “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 

165. 

221 TO PREVENT THE JEWS FROM READING IT. See: Ford, The Int’l Jew, Vol. III, id., 

“B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 168; Dearborn Independent, May 14, 1921. 



is one of the financial controllers of the country. The classes [of these Jews] must 

be kept distinct for a reason which will appear when the methods of the rich Jews 

and the methods of the poor Jews to gain power are differentiated. 222/ 

In each volume of Ford’s International Jew, The Reader can find similar references to 

the innocence of the common Jew and the guilt of the inter=nation=al Jew. The Reader will do 

himself, not Jewry, as service by finding those references. 

Read also, the “Introduction” to this Book, titled “Prefaces To The Four Book Editions of 

The International Jew,” for more details on the accuracy of the targeting of the International Jew 

from the ordinary, non-conspiratorial Jewry. 

Further, the use if the word “forgery” in Ford’s “apology” statement conforms to the 

generally understood theory — as shown in earlier in this Introduction, The Protocols were then 

and are now an exact word-representation of the original image, though plainly not in an exact 

handwriting-representation of that original image. How can someone apologize for “forgery” 

the Apologizer did not do? How can someone apologize for a document complained of by the 

Jews as having the exactness of the wording of the original though claimed as being a forgery, 

when the same Complainers fail to overcome the “forgery” of the intent of those “forged” 

words? and worse, fail to overcome thee “presumption of correctness” by producing the 

document they claim was “forged? For it logically follows, that for a “forgery” to exist, there 

must have been an “original” that was the basis for the alleged “forgery.” No one has overcome 

that basic fact. 

Part 2. 

A BRIEF, RELEVANT BIOGRAPHY OF 

GERALD L.K. SMITH 

Derived From Mostly Jewish Sources 223/ 

From whom else can we learn the truth about ourselves, if not from our pleasing 

friends? From our enemies, who are more than willing to tell us — and all others 

— of it, and completely, without reservation or consideration; there, we shall find 

ourself as we are. (Ed.). 224/ 

During the 1930’s and 1940’s, Gerald L.K. Smith (19//-1976) was an author of some 

books 225/ and was a member of the Silver Shirts, a neo-fascist American anti-Semitic 

organization led by William Dudley Pelly, who was accused by Pelly’s Jewish Adversaries of 

being designed to match Adolph Hitler’s Sturm Abeilung, or Storm Troopers — the “Brown 

Shirts.” 

222 THE CLASSES OF JEWS, DISTINCT. Ford, The Int’l Jew, Vol I, The World’s Foremost 

Problem, Chp. 1., “The Jew in Character and Business,” p. 11-12. 

223 FOR THE SMITH BIO FROM JEWISH SOURCES. Generally: Ernest Wolkman, A Legacy 

of Hate: Anti-Semitism in America, (New York, Franklin Watts, Pub., 1982) at pp. 36, 39, 132- 

133. 

224 SMITH’S BIOGRAPHY. See also, Henry Ford’s Bio, at A GOOD BIOGRAPHY. 

225 See: Lee, Henry Ford & the Jews, p. 110. 



Other similar contemporary groups were the Crusaders for Economic Liberty (also 

known as the “White Shirts”), and the American Vigilantes, led by Gerald Winrod, a Smith 

contemporary and fundamentalist evangelist who won a wide following in the Middle West of 

America by claiming that the “international Jew” was responsible for “the scourge of 

international Communism.” 

With their “gaudy uniforms, strident rhetoric, virulent anti-Semitism, and occasional 

show of arms,” these groups are said to represent the most sensational expression of Jew-hatred 

in American history. 226/ 

Pelly said his group, the Silver Shirts, represented “the cream, the head and flower of our 

Protestant Christian manhood.” There was only one goal for the Silver Shirts, in 1934: There is 

but one issue in the United States, and that is the forcible removal of the Jew from [public] 

office.” The Silver Shirts preceded the Christian Nationalist Crusade, which was the 

predecessor, or perhaps parent organization, of today’s Christian Patriot League. 

The Christian Nationalist Crusade is alleged to be the “grandfather of extremist 

Christianity.” Smith was the member of the “Silver Shirts” when he assumed leadership after 

Mr. Pelly was imprisoned for sedition in 1942 — allegedly by promoting Nazi propaganda. 

Smith established and lead the Crusade, said to be about the more notorious of anti-Semitic 

organizations in the United states at that time, and he continued as Director for the next 35 years, 

until his death in 1976. 

Smith was an aide to the populist Louisiana governor, Huey Long, and followed that line 

of work by being a candidate for the U.S. Senate,first as a Republican then as an Independent, 

and “failed miserably,” according to those critical of him. 227/ He ran for U.S. president in 

1948, 228/ on a platform that included deportation of all Jews, then began publishing The Cross 

and The Flag, the Crusade’s monthly magazine. For the next twenty-eight years the magazine, 

entirely written by Mr. Smith, published every conceivable type of anti-Semitism, marked by 

what he considered clever turns of phrase: “Jew York,” “Christ-hating mobsters,” “the Jew-N,” 

(referring to the United Nations), “the Anti-Defamation League: the OGPU of Jewry,” and 

“Communism and Zionism, the twins of the anti-Christ.” 

Given that sort of hatred, and further, given Smith’s well-known credentials as a 

professional anti-Semite, it was therefore somewhat surprising to find that in 1969 the federal 

government awarded to the state of Arkansas a grant of $182,000 to build a road to Smith’s pet 

project, a 67-foot high statue of Jesus Christ, near Eureka Springs, Arkansas. Publicity 

226 

GAUDY UNIFORMS, STRIDENT RHETORIC, VIRULENT ANTI-SEMITISM. Volkman, 

Id., p. 36. 

227 SMITH’s POLITICAL CAREER. See: Levy, A Lie & A Libel, Intro., p. 46 at n. 7, 2. 

228 FORD AND SMITH. Smith claimed a “personal friendship” with Henry Ford. Levy, A Lie & 

A Libel, id, p. 46, n. 7, 2. Ford apparently “supported” Smith financially, and is quoted as 

saying: “I wish Gerald L.K. Smith could be president of the United States.” Lee, Henry Ford & 

the Jews, p. 110. While it is not mentioned directly, Smith apparently talked too much to the 

general public about Ford’s help, and Smith was dropped from Ford’s acquaintance. Lee, id., at 

111. 



compelled the government to abandon what some considered the gross misuse of taxpayer’s 

money, although Smith, in a letter to the people of Eureka Springs, blamed it on “the lethal 

enemies of Jesus Christ.” Later, in a news conference, Smith went on further to blame the 

cancellation on a “conspiracy of organized Jews.” Smith was even more infuriated when he 

learned that Jewish groups were protesting his idea to stage a Passion Play loaded with anti- 

Semitic hatred. Protesting Jewish groups were not only upset at the plan to stage the play, but 

also at the Humble Oil and Refining Company, whose vacation guide book listed Smiths 

location(s) as among the “recommended” outdoor attractions for vacationers. 

The Anti-Defamation League complained, as they do, to Humble Oil Company, which 

responded that Humble Oil was unaware that Smith’s record as an anti-Semite, but then it is said 

that Humble Oil added that the company didn’t much care if he was. The Anti-Defamation 

League decided to consider this a thoughtless response, and told the general public of that 

theory. This caused many Jewish, and some ignorant non-Jewish customers to avoid that 

company. Supposedly, Humble Oil Company “got the point and issued an elaborate apology.” 

This apology is not available presently for The Reader’s review. 

Smith is alleged by his Jewish detractors to have gone to his grave convinced that some 

of these episodes in which his personal views were obstructed or frustrated were proof of the 

insidious, all-pervasive power of the American Jewry, and it sharpened Smith’s anti-Semitism in 

his last years, which seemed to be perfectly all right with his followers. 

Even after his death these followers continued to believe, as of 1982 — the publication 

date of the Source for much of this information, in the “myth” of a Jewish conspiracy, and 

however much such convictions might sound lunatic to others, the fact is that Jewish authors 

estimate the Christian Nationalist Crusade was getting about $300,000.00 per year in donations 

(in 1970’s dollar-values). The dollar-amount has no confirming data attached to it in Jewish 

publications, and it may be even higher, since The Adversary would probably not go so far as to 

make us feel that much better about a predecessors’ financial condition we might attempt to 

emulate. Smith’s attitude toward the Jews was suggested by his Jewish detractors as being a 

conviction which it could be the hallmark, or measuring stick, of all similar “extreme right-wing 

groups.” 



Part 3. 

Prefaces to the Four Volume Book editions 229/ 

of Henry Ford’s Publication of 

THE INTERNATIONAL JEW 

From Volume One 

“The World’s Foremost Problem” 

Why discuss the Jewish Question? Because it is here, and because its emergence into 

American thought should contribute to its solution, and about to a continuation of those bad 

conditions which surround the Question in other countries. 

The Jewish Question has existed in the United States for a long time. Jews themselves 

have known this, even if Gentiles have not. There have been periods in our own country when it 

has broken forth with sullen sort of strength which presaged darker things to come. 230/ Many 

signs portend that it is approaching an acute stage. 

Not only does the Jewish Question touch those matters what are of common knowledge, 

such as financial and commercial control, usurpation of political power, monopoly of necessities 

[of life], and autocratic direction of the very news that the American people read; but it reaches 

into the cultural regions and so touches the very heart of American life. 

This question reaches down into South America and threatens to become an important 

factor in Pan-American relations. It is interwoven with much of the menace or organized and 

calculated disorder which troubles the nations today. It is not of recent growth, but its roots go 

deep, and the long Past of this Problem is counterbalanced by prophetic hopes and programs 

which involve a very deliberate and creative view of the Future. 

This little book is the partial record of an investigation of the Jewish Question. It is 

printed to enable interested readers to inform themselves on the data published in The Dearborn 

Independent prior to Oct. 1, 1920. The demand for back copies of the paper was so great that the 

supply was exhausted early, as was also a large edition of a booklet containing the first nine 

articles of the series. The investigation still proceeds, and the articles will continue to appear as 

heretofore until work is done. 

229 FOUR VOLUME BOOK SET EDITIONS. This Compiler & Editor is not aware of any other 

Volumes, nor of any other articles which appeared in the Dearborn Independent and not reprinted 

in the books titled “The International Jew.” 

The Reader is reminded that Henry Ford himself declined to continue printing his version 

of The International Jew, but others have continued to publish and distribute that Work. 

Mr. Ford also asked that his name not be used with that Work; however, since Gerald 

L.K. Smith has also published an abridged edition of Ford’s Work, the name “Ford” used in This 

Book will distinguish the citation or quotation from Mr. Smith’s Work. (Ed.). 

230 DARKER THINGS TO COME. This editorial statement was made in October, 1920. 



The motive of this work is simply a desire to make facts known to the people. Other 

motives have, of course, been ascribed to it. But the motive of prejudice or any form of 

antagonism is hardly strong enough to support such an investigation as this. Moreover, had an 

unworthy motive existed, some sign of it would inevitably appear in the work itself. We 

confidently call the reader to witness that the tome of these articles is all that it should be. The 

International Jew and his satellites, as the conscious enemies of all that Anglo-Saxon mean by 

civilization, are not spared, nor is that unthinking mass which defends anything that a Jew does, 

simply because it has been taught to believe that what Jewish leaders do is Jewish. Neither do 

these articles proceed upon a false emotion of brotherhood and apology, as if this stream of 

doubtful tendency in the world were only accidently Jewish. We give the facts as we find them; 

that of itself is sufficient protection against prejudice or passion. 

This volume does not complete the case by any means. But it brings the reader along one 

step. In future compilations of these and subsequent articles the entire scope of the inquiry will 

more clearly appear. 

c. October, 1920. 

From Volume Two 

“Jewish Activities in the United States” 

A former volume, containing the first twenty articles in the series of Jewish studies which 

began their appearance in The Dearborn Independent of May 22, 1920, dealt largely with the 

theory of the Jewish World Program. The present volume gives a general view of some of the 

evidence which illustrates and substantiates that Program. As the first volume brought the 

subject forward a step, the present volume brings it forward another step. The Question is a very 

big one, the material is of mountainous proportions, so that it is very desirable that there be 

simplicity of method. The method therefore has been to lay the observable everyday facts 

alongside the Program, to see if they agree. It will be time enough to take up the authenticity of 

the Protocols when the parallel between them and the activities of the Jewish leaders is shown. 

The articles thus far printed remain unanswered. They have been denounced and 

misrepresented, but not answered. A favorite evasion of Jewish editors is to say that the 

statements made about the Jews could be made about any other race, and that no race could 

refute the statements with facts. But these statements have not been made about any other race 

and could they be ? If they were made about, say, the Hungarians, Poles, Rumanians, Italians, 

English, Scotch, Irish, Russian or Syrian in our midst, could they not be met? 

Not the mere fact that certain statements are made about the purposes of Jewish leaders, 

but the fact that people can see wherein the statements agree with actual conditions, is what 

gives strength to the statements. The same statements made about any other group would fall 

because the people could find nothing to sustain them. Say-so and hearsay have no weight at all. 

Neither has abuse or prejudice. If the statements made in these articles are false, they are of a 

nature which can be refuted with facts. If there is no parallel between the written Program of the 

Protocols and the actual program as followed under Jewish leadership, surely that can be shown. 

If it has not been shown, it is because the parallel exists, and Jewish leaders know it exists. 



The following chapters take up numerous matters, chiefly the interference of the Jew 

with educational and religious interests of the majority of the people; the moral menace in the 

Jew-controlled theater and movie; the fight of the Mew York Stock Exchange against Jewish 

domination; a discussion of the question whether the Jews are a “religious denomination” or a 

race, only Jewish authorities being quoted; and a very slight beginning on the endless subject of 

Jewish influence during the Great War. 231/ Bernard M. Baruch,* although secondary in the real 

Jewish counsels, proclaimed himself to a Congressional committee as “the most powerful man in 

the war,” 232/ and the records show that he was. 

This volume does not complete the case. It is issued to meet the demand of new readers 

who call for the articles from the beginning. The editions of The Dearborn Independent being 

long exhausted, the publication of these two volumes 233/ was undertaken to enable readers to 

begin with the first article. The omission of several single articles from this compilation is in the 

interest of compactness, and may be restored in another volume. The omitted articles are “The 

Jews’ Complaint Against Àmericanism,’” Oct. 23; 234/ “Gentile Fall Involved in Hope of Jewish 

Rule,” Dec. 25 235/ [1920]. 

c. April 1921. 

From Volume Three 

“Jewish Influences in American Life”] 

The present volume, third in the series, is compiled for the same purpose as its 

predecessors — to enable new readers of The Dearborn Independent to commence their reading 

with the earlier articles in the series of studies in the Jewish Question. 

It was inevitable that the publication first to open the discussion of this Question should 

be compelled to meet the degrading charge of “anti-semitism” and kindred falsehoods; but it was 

also inevitable that if the work of such a publication should prove to be valid, the way would be 

cleared for discussion by other publications which had not and need not bring upon themselves 

the charge of racial hatred. 

This is precisely what has occurred. An undreamed of publicity for the essentials of the 

Jewish Question has been achieved in this country. It is noteworthy that whether the publicity be 

in agreement with or against The Dearborn Independent, the essential facts are the same. and 

these facts were first set forth in this paper. 

That, indeed, constitutes the strength of the articles. The facts are provable; they are not 

disprovable. The reader can confirm the facts from his own observation. With regard to the 

matters discussed in these volumes, there are too many observers of the Jew to permit 

231 THE GREAT WAR. Referring to what is now historically known as “World War I.” 

232 THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WAR. [Cites needed] 

233 THESE TWO VOLUMES. This “Volume II” and “Volume I.” 

234 JEWS’ COMPLAINT AGAINST ÀMERICANISM.’ See Vol. IV, Int’l Jew, Chp. LXVI, 

“The Jews Complaint Against Àmericanism,’” p. 54. 

235 GENTILE FALL INVOLVED IN HOPE OF JEWISH RULE. This article has not been found 

any of the four books in the May, 1976 reprint of “The International Jew” by Liberty Bell Pub. 



misstatements to pass. this also constitutes the dilemma of the self-appointed defenders of the 

Jews: they may abuse The Dearborn Independent, but they cannot disprove the facts. They do 

not make even an impressive denial of them. The whole situation would be much clarified if 

Jewish spokesmen would use frankness, instead of a fusillade of cheap and irrelevant abuse. 

The year [1921] has witnessed much notable discussion of The Jewish Question in 

Magazines of quality. A few have descended to white-washing, fewer still to sheer pro-Jewish 

propaganda; but such articles as these in the September Century; those in the Atlantic for 

February, May and July; The Nineteenth Century and After for April; the true and admirable 

accounts by Lieut. Commander Hugo W. Koehler, of the U.S. Navy, in the World’s Work for 

July, August, September and October — these testify to the reality of the matter. The more 

serious religious press, as represented by publications like the Christian Standard, the Christian 

Century, The Moody Monthly which is published by The Moody Bible Institute, Chicago, have 

also added materially to the literature of the question. In editorial vision and liberty of 

discussion, the religious press has shown itself to be freer of control than has the secular press. 

This volume contains information dealing with the influence of the Jewish idea on 

American life. The departments of life here studied do not by any means exhaust the list. The 

studies are more and more centering on the actual operations of the Jewish program upon the 

American people, and the effect of Jewish conceptions on our common life. These studies are 

appearing in The Dearborn Independent now. They will be gathered into future volumes as may 

be required. 

c. November, 1921. 

From Volume Four 

“Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States” 

This is the fourth volume of reprinted studies in the Jewish Question as they appears in 

The Dearborn Independent. The articles follow the same general line as the previous volume in 

showing the various angles of Jewish influence and achievement in the affairs of the people of 

the United States, but they do not by any means exhaust either the number of angles nor the 

depth of the significance in the angles traced. 

Deliberate public opinion has shown many signs of a new alertness to the movement 

which was proceeding deftly and unnoticed in the midst of America, and many checks have been 

put in operation. The work of the Dearborn Independent was undertaken at a disadvantage 

because of the tremendous emphasis of the American mind on racial peace and because of the 

ease with which racial propagandists can make a purely economic and political matter assume 

the aspects of a religious controversy. The Dearborn Independent opened the Question to public 

gaze, and was therefore assumed to be the attacker. In this country our sense of fairness always 

leaves the advantage with the attacked, and false accusations quickly fall. The country has seen, 

however, the truth of the statements and has observed the mild and unprejudiced manner in 

which they were made, so that it may now be said that truth had made its way. 

Most gratifying are the signs which Jews themselves have given that certain abuses must 

be quickly stopped. A Jewish leader has appealed for the removal of the exemption which 

nullifies the Constitution of the United States in favor of the Jew with reference to the use of 



liquor. Other Jewish leaders have sought to compel Jewish theatrical controllers to observe 

elementary decency in their productions. 

These articles have always held that the cleansing must come from within Judah 236/ itself. 

It is recognized that racial pride might prevent many improvements being attempted under fire, 

but American Jews cannot afford to be ruled by a false pride in this respect. These are days of 

judgment for all the corruptive forces of society and the Jews cannot expect to escape 

responsibility for their part in these things. 

c. May, 1922. 

236 JUDAH. The editors of “The International Jew” series are in error. The modern-day Jews are 

not descendants of the genealogically nor Scripturally pure “Tribe (or House) of Judah” (Judah, 

the son of Isaac, who was the son of Jacob, and who was the son of Abraham; therefore Judah, 

the grandson of Abraham); nor are the “Jews” derived from any other Tribe or House of Israel 

whose heritage appears in The Old Testament Books in the Bible; even more: there are no 

“Jews” in the “Old Testament” of The Bible. Here is seen the foundation stones for what Martin 

Luther titled “The Jews and Their Lies.” Cites needed. See also, Matthew 15:24; Matt. 10:5-6; 

Matt. 10:23. Further study will reveal that true “Israel” is represented among Caucasians, not 

Jewry of today or of any time in all history; however, that is not the subject matter of this Work. 

According to The Old Testament Bible, great effort was made to see that Israelites should 

marry only among the Israelites (Genesis Chp. 23:3-4; Gen. 27:46 to Chp. 28:1). 

Some “Jews” apparently originate from the non-Israelite, mixed-bloodline established by 

Judah when he intermingled by marriage into the Canaanite peoples, with one son surviving with 

descendants (Gen. 38:1-5) who held then and now ideas and morals contrary to Israelite 

principles of what is now the “Christianity” deriving from the House of Israel’s most wellknown 

and arguably the most successful family member of Judah’s lawful descendants: Jesus of 

Nazareth, also known to most Adherents of the Christian faith as Jesus Christ. (See, “Who are 

the Jews?” Your Heritage Chp. 110, p. 334, by Bertrand Comparet, 19__, Your Heritage Pub., 

San Diego, Calif.). 

Other “Jews” originate from the Kazar and other Turkish and Asian/Mongoloid races 

now found in eastern Europe. (Comparet, id., at p. 339), and such are definitely not of true 

Israelite origins. 



Part 4. 

A Listing of the Chapters 

As They are Titled in 

Ford’s Four Volume Book Set, 

The International Jew 

NOTE: 

Below each Chapter title is the date that Chapter was published as an article in Henry 

Ford’s own newspaper — with a 300,000 circulation in 1920 — The Dearborn Independent. As 

seen in the above “Prefaces” to the four volume book set, The International Jew, it is admitted 

that not all of the articles relating to the “international Jew” as published in the Dearborn 

Independent were also published in The International Jew. Therefore, The Reader should 

endeavor to discover those “missing” articles, copy and then study them for future reference. 

The Reader will also note that the publication dates are not presented in chronological order in 

the four-volume book set. The Compiler & Editor of This Book has not yet confirmed these 

publication dates, nor any “missing” articles. 

“*” indicates this Chapter of Ford, The International Jew, has been cited in a footnote in 

Book One, “Introduction, or Book Three, “Annotated Text,” of This Book, as noted in the 

relevant footnotes. This is not a complete listing of “*” notations. 

From Volume One 

“The World’s Foremost Problem” 

Chp. I. The Jew in Character and Business. 

May 22, 1920 

Chp. II. Germany’s Reaction Against the Jew 

May 29, 1920 

Chp. III. Jewish History in the United States 

June 5, 1920 

Chp. IV. The Jewish Question — Fact or Fancy” 

June 12, 1920 

Chp. V. Anti-Semitism — Will It Appear In the U.S.? 

June 19, 1920 

Chp. VI. Jewish Question Breaks Into the Magazines 

June 26, 1920 

Chp. VII. Arthur Brisbane Leaps to the Help of Jewry* 

July 3, 1920 

Chp. VIII. Does a Definite Jewish World Program Exist? 

July 10, 1920 

Chp. IX. The Historic Basis of Jewish Imperialism* 

July 17, 1920 

Chp. X. Introduction to the `Jewish Protocols’* 

July 24, 1920 

Chp. XI. ‘Jewish’ Estimate of Gentile Human Nature* 

July 31, 1920. 



Chp. XII. `Jewish Protocols’ Claim Partial Fulfillment* 

August 7, 1920. 

Chp. XIII.`Jewish’ Plan To Split Society By Ìdeas’* 

August 14, 1920 

Chp. XIV. Did the Jews Foresee the World War?* 

August 21, 1920. 

Chp. XV. Is The Jewish `Kahal’ The Modern Soviet?* 

August 20, 1920. 

Chp. XVI. How The `Jewish Question’ Touches The Farm* 

September 4, 1920. 

Chp. XVII.Does Jewish Power Control the World Press?* 


Chp. XVIII. Does This Explain Jewish Political Power?* 


Chp. XIX. The All-Jewish Mark on “Red Russia” 

September 25, 1920 

Chp. XX. Jewish Testimony in Favor of Bolshevism 

October 2, 1920 

From Volume Two 

“Jewish Activities in the United States” 

Chp. XXI. How Jews in the U.S. Conceal Their Strength 


Chp. XXII. Jewish Testimony on “Are Jews A Nation?” 


Chp. XXIII. Jew Versus Non-Jew in New York Finance 

November 13, 1920 

Chp. XXIV. The High and Low of Jewish Money Power 


Chp. XXV. “Disraeli of America” — A Jew of Super-Power 


Chp. XXVI. The Scope of Jewish Dictatorship in the U.S. 

December 4, 1920 

Chp. XXVII. Jewish Copper Kings Reap Rich War-Profits 


Chp. XXVIII. Jewish Control of the American Theater 

January 1, 1921 

Chp. XXIX. The Rise of the First Jewish Theatrical Trust 


Chp. XXX. How Jews Capitalized a Protest Against Jews 


Chp. XXXI. The Jewish Aspect of the “Movie” Problem 

February 12, 1921 

Chp. XXXII. Jewish Supremacy in Motion Picture World 


Chp. XXXIII. Rule of the Jewish Kehillah Grips New York 



[Pub. Date Not Found in current Sources.] 

Chp. XXXIV. The Jewish Demand for “Rights” in America 

March 5, 1921 

Chp. XXXV. “Jewish Rights” Clash with American Rights 

March 12, 1921 

Chp. XXXVI. “Jewish Rights” to Put Studies Out of Schools 

March 19, 1921 

Chp. XXXVII. Disraeli — British Premier, Portrays the Jews 


Chp. XXXVIII. [U.S.Pres.]Taft Once Tried to Resist Jews — and Failed 


Chp. XXXIX. When Editors Were Independent of the Jews 


Chp. XL. Why the Jews Dislike the Morgenthau Report 


Chp. XLI. Jews Use the [W.W.I.] Peace Conference to Blind Poland 


Chp. XLII. The Present Status of the Jewish Question 


From Volume Three 

“Jewish Influences in American Life” 

Chp. XLIII. The Jews and the “Religious Persecution” Cry 

June 4, 1921 

Chp. XLIV. Are the Jews Victims or Persecutors? 

June 11, 1921 

Chp. XLV. Jewish Gamblers Corrupt American Baseball 


Chp. XLVI. Jewish Degradation of American Baseball 


Chp. XLVII. Jewish Jazz Becomes Our National Music 

August 6, 1921 

Chp. XVIII. How the Jewish Song Trust Makes You Sing 

August 13, 1921 

Chp. XLIX. Jewish Hot-Beds of Bolshevism in the U.S. 

April 16, 1921 

Chp. LI. Jewish Trades (Unions) Link With World Revolutionaries 

April 23, 1921 

Chp. LI. Will Jewish Zionism Bring Armageddon? 

May 28, 1921 

Chp. LII. How the Jews Use Power — By an Eyewitness 


Chp. LIII. How Jews Ruled and Ruined Tammany Hall 


Chp. LIV. Jew Wires Direct Tammany’s Gentile Puppets 


Chp. LV. B’nai B’rith Leader discusses the Jews* 



May 14, 1921 

Chp. LVI. Dr. Levy, a Jew, Admits His People’s Error 

April 30, 1921 

Chp. LVII. Jewish Idea in American Monetary Affairs 

June 18, 1921 

Chp. LVIII. Jewish Ides Molded Federal Reserve Plan 

June 25, 1921 

Chp. LIX. Jewish Idea of Central Bank for America 

July 2, 1921 

Chp. LX. How Jewish International Finance Functions 

July 9, 1921 

Chp. LXI. Jewish Power and America’s Money Famine 

July 16, 1921 

From Volume Four 

“Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States” 

Chp. LXII. How Jews Gained American Liquor Control 


Chp. LXIII. Gigantic Jewish Liquor Trust and Its Career 


Chp. LXIV. The Jewish Element in Bootlegging Evil 


Chp. LXV. Angles of Jewish Influence in American Life 

May 21, 1921 

Chp. LXVI. The Jews’ Complaint Against “Americanism” 


Chp. LXVII. The Jewish Associates of Benedict Arnold 


Chp. LXVIII. Arnold and His Jewish Aid in Shady Deal 


Chp. LXIX. Arnold and His Jewish Aids at West Point 


Chp. LXXX. The Gentle Art of Changing Jewish Names 


Chp. LXXI. Jewish “Kol Nidre” 237/ and “Eli, Eli” 238/ Explained 


237 JEWISH “KOL NIDRE.” Referring to the Jewish prayer, named form its opening words, 

“All vows” (kol nidre): “He who wishes that his vows and oaths shall have no value, stand up at 

the beginning of the year and say: ‘All vows which I shall make during the year shall be of no 

value.’” From the Talmud. See, Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. IV, Chp. LXXI., “Jewish `Kol Nidre’ and 

Èli, Eli’ Explained,” p. 124. 

238 “ELI, ELI.” “It is an incantation designed to inflame the lower classes of Jews against the 

people, and intensify the racial consciousness of Eastern Jews....based on the first verse of the 

Twenty-Second Psalm, best known by Christians as the Cry of Christ on the Cross.” Ford, Int’l 

Jew, Vol. IV, Chp. LXXI., p. 128. 



Chp. LXXII. Jews as New York Magistrates See them 


Chp. LXXIII. Jews Are Silent, the National Voice is Heard 

July 30, 1921 

Chp. LXXIV. What Jews Attempted Where They Had Power 


Chp. LXXV. The Jewish Question in Current Testimony 

August 27, 1921 

Chp. LXXVI. America’s Jewish Enigma — Louis Marshall 


Chp. LXXVII. The Economic Plans of International Jews 

July 23, 1921 

Chp. LXXVIII. A Jew Sees His People As Others See Them 

May 7, 1921 

Chp. LXXIX. Candid Address to Jews on the Jewish Problem 


Chp. LXXX. An Address to “Gentiles” on the Jewish Problem 


======================================= 

S E C T I O N T H R E E 

For Section Three, there is offered a very brief description of the Russian Jewry’s silent 

seizure of our “federal” government in the 1930’s. This is not taught in the “government 

schools,” and therefore tends to be rejected by the “Graduates” thereof, until they study the 

matters for themselves, sans instructors, who for the obedience to The Plan, would direct the 

student’s thought away from those truths. 

The “invasion” of the more combative elements of the Russian Jewry in to America in 

the 1930’s is second to none, except the “Hispanic mass migration “invasion” into the Southwest 

United States since the mid-1970’s, until the entire Western states are inundated with Hispanic 

peoples. It has been determined that the Hispanic migration into the United States was based on 

1) economics and 2) the alleged political re-establishment of “Aztlan,” or, Land of the Aztec. 

The weakness of political America has made the recovery this ancient loss possible. Apparently 

the Hispanic masses are at best loosely organized and are intent on merely living here and 

enjoying the benefits of “freedom.” 

The Jews who came into this country in the 1930’s apparently were a tightly controlled, 

systematic machine, designed to accomplish the plans of The Symbolic Snake as described 

above. They had no real national ties, as indicated above; their “religion” of power was their 

allegiance. These international Jews, previously feasted on the Russian Revolution, and then 

immigrated to America to pluck off the best they could get — which was quite a lot, as The 

Reader shall see, in this morsel of revelation. Most people have no idea the extent “reformist” 

Jewry played in the erection of the “federal government’s” dominion over the individual. Here 

is described, meagerly, the start of it all. 



Part 1. 

IMMIGRANT JEWS IN THE 

ROOSEVELT ADMINISTRATION. 239/ 

(Derived Mostly, if not Entirely, From Jewish Sources) 

Jews represent about 2% to 3% of the entire population in the United States. 240/ Yet, their 

presence in occupying all levels of the administrative offices of government, local, county, state, 

and federal, is totally out of proportion to their national-percentages. To help explain their 

presence, the following account is offered as a matter of factual history — undenied by the Jews 

who accomplished it. This is only a draft account of those events, but enough is shown here to 

awaken The Reader to the events, and the occupants, of today’s “government,” where a superminority 

rules a super-majority — and where that super-minority, despite their claims of a 

Judeo-religious heritage (whenever it is convenient for them to do so), had no agreement with 

the idea that “a little political power helps put a divine message across.” 241/ 

Jewish writers revel when telling how Jews moved so quickly into the lower Presidential 

and Executive offices Franklin D. Roosevelt during the A.D.1930’s, and either revised existing 

federal/state laws and initiated i.e., “the New Deal.” Their glee can be perceived by those who 

are aware of the intent and the practice of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, even 

though the Jewish writers themselves try their best to cloak their ancestors’ concertedly coincidental 

acts through serious-sounding phrases and slights of grammar. 

When Roosevelt was elected in 1932 as U.S. President — along with Herbert Lehman as 

Governor of New York — “the latter [Lehman,] New York’s finest Jewish governor” — it 

transformed into a basic fact of life that Jews were powerfully involved in political life in 

America. “The vigor and courage with which Roosevelt and Lehman attacked the crisis of the 

Depression appealed to the Jews — not merely as a `marginal’ economic group but also as a 

group traditionally devoted to reformist ideals.” 242/ Roosevelt thereafter enjoyed — as it may be 

— two decades of Jewish support, during which Roosevelt “could do no wrong in Jewish 

eyes.” 243/ 

239 

JEWS IN THE ROOSEVELT ADMIN. [More Quotes, Sources are needed here to tie in each 

“player.”]. 

240 ESTIMATIONS OF JEWISH POPULATION %. See U.S. Census Details; and, American 

Jewish Yearbook, Chp. “Statistics.” 

241 

POLITICAL POWER HELPS PUT A DIVINE MESSAGE ACROSS. Max I. Dimont, The 

Indestructible Jews (New York, Signet, 1971), p. 146. 

242 

ROOSEVELT & REFORMIST IDEALS. Sachar, The Course of Modern Jewish History, 

Chp. XVI, “Russian Jewry’s `Liberal’ Tradition in America — The Communist Crisis and the 

Triumph of the New Deal,” p. 334. “Reformist ideals,” meaning, i.e., to put or change into a new 

or improved form or condition. Webst. Int’l. Dict., “reform,” p. 2093; Also, Protocol No. 1.9, n., 

“THE DESTROYER OF THE STRUCTURE.” 

243 ROOSEVELT COULD DO NO WRONG.. Yaffe, id., p. 32. “In fact, until circumstances 

combined to push him, FDR took a highly cautious, almost lenient attitude toward the Nazis, and 

he was known to be distinctly cold toward the idea of a Jewish state in Palestine.” Yaffe, id, p. 

32. “It is no accident that the American Jew’s political heroes in this century have been 

patricians, like [Adlai] Stevenson, John Kennedy, and Franklin Roosevelt, not folksy men of the 

people, like Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson.” Yaffe, id., p. 255. 



Franklin Roosevelt did not merely reflecte a characteristic Jewish viewpoint on 

economic 244/ and social 245/ issues; far more, he was actively influenced by that Jewish viewpoint. 

Once Roosevelt was inaugurated in to the Office of President, he began “a sweeping series of 

legislative changes since the Civil War period.” 246/ It was the beginning of a new government: a 

“new deal,” and it was not dealing favorably toward the non-Jewish American people. The ideas 

and tactics Roosevelt — no, Roosevelt’s Jewish sidekicks — used were said to be those 

“borrowed from the mavericks of the past: from Progressive 247/ tradition of Theodore 

Roosevelt 248/ and the La Follettes of Wisconsin, 249/ from the Wilsonian concept of the New 

Freedom. 250/ But in no small measure it drew from strenuous preoccupation with social justice 251/ 

which was formulated by outstanding Jewish liberals.” 

* Patricians: persons of high birth or breeding, nobel, or aristocratic; not plebeian: 

common, crude, coarse. Webst.Int’l Dict., 2nd ed., pp. 1793, 1888]. 

244 JEWISH VIEWPOINT ON ECONOMIC ISSUES. The “old saying” goes: “He who has the 

gold, rules.” (Ed.). 

245 JEWISH VIEWPOINT ON SOCIAL ISSUES. Jews have always been “reforming” and 

changing the established social structure (Protocol 1.9, destroyer of the structure); in the process, 

the contentment of the common, majority peoples — the non-Jews — were then and are now 

disrupted, to “adjust” to the forceful intrusion of an unwelcome people: “The Jews and Their 

Lies,” as Martin Luther put it accurately. (Luther’s Works, Vol. 47). And the Jews admit this fact 

throughout all their writings. It would require a book of its own, simply to list the sources. (Ed.). 

246 SWEEPING SERIES OF LEGISLATIVE CHANGES. Sachar, Course of Modern Jewish 

History, p. 334. 

247 PROGRESSIVE, defined. [Sources related to “communist `progressive.’” needed]. 

248 THEODORE ROOSEVELT. Theodore Roosevelt is said to have “appointed Oscar Straus his 

Secretary of Commerce and Labor, and admitted privately that if Straus hadn’t been available, 

he would have chosen another Jew for the post.” James Yaffe, The American Jews, Portrait of a 

Split Personality, Chp. XVI., “Lay Religion,” p. 242. 

249 THE LA FOLLETTES OF WISCONSIN. The name of a family of American statesmen: 

Robert (“Battling Bob”) Marion L~~, Sr. (1855-1925); Philip Fox La F~~ (1897-1965), his son. 

Involved in pro-labor, farm legislation. World Book Encycl., (1973) Vol. 12-L, p. 31. 

250 WILSONIAN CONCEPT OF THE NEW FREEDOM. [RESERVED. Wilson’s “New 

Freedom” has not yet been researched]. 

“Wilson pleased because the Jews of America by constantly calling Bernard Baruch to 

the White House for consultations.” Yaffe, the American Jews, p. 242. Before Wilson, 

“Theodore Roosevelt hailed him [Baruch] as the most able man in the [Wilson] Administration.” 

Margaret Coit, Mr. Baruch, The man, the myth, the eighty years (Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co. 

1957), Chp. 13, “Politics as usual,” p. 359, citing “Theodore Roosevelt to Moe A. Gunst, Aug. 

14, 1917, copy in Baruch’s papers.” Coit, at Notes, p. 731, n. 101. 

251 STRENUOUS PREOCCUPATION WITH SOCIAL JUSTICE. In other words, a continuous 

and concerted “liberal” attack upon the established powers and institutions, where the end 

justifies the means. (Ed.). 



Part 2. 

THE ROOSEVELT “NEW DEAL” AND ITS DEALER-AUTHORS. 252/ 

During the 1930’s, in the so-called “Depression” caused by the American bankers who 

were part of the private banking system, many of those financiers were concerned that the 

United States would not be able to pay its “debts” to those “creditors.” Therefore, these 

Creditors sent to The Franklin D. Roosevelt Administration several of their own people, being 

coincidently Jewish, to propose and then obtain the enactment and “administration” of those 

plans. It was called a “New Deal.” and it required a major overhaul, or else a major creation, of 

a body of “law” that was not subject to the confines of the Constitution for the United States of 

America. A tricky means, though plain to those educated in, and skilled in, the exactness of such 

legal technicalities that “System” would require. Among these sent by the banker-creditors to 

assure that system’s creation were entirely The Jew — and they had help in high places. 

The “New Deal” received important and almost necessary support from Louis Dembitz 

Brandeis — affectionately called “Isaiah” by Roosevelt — and Felix Frankfurter — “a 

passionate liberal; a hard minded realist,” 253/ the Jewish members of the Supreme Court 254/ of the 

United States. 

Its “intellectual foundations” were strengthened in Brandeis’ legal briefs, opinions, and 

judicial dissents. 255/ “Two unique characteristics distinguished Brandeis’ briefs: one was a truly 

fantastic thoroughness of preparation, an exhaustive accumulation of data and statistics from the 

inner workings of business economy; the other was the frank invocation of social ethics as a 

criterion for legal decision.” 256/ 

252 

ROOSEVELT “NEW DEAL” AND ITS DEALER-AUTHORS. [More Quotes, Sources are 

needed here to tie in each “player.”]. 

253 

BRANDEIS, CALLED “ISAIAH”; FRANKFURTER, HARD-MINDED. Sachar, id., pp. 

335, 336. 

254 JEWISH MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT. “Let us all recognize that we Jews are a 

distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his station, his shade of belief, is 

necessarily a member.” Justice Brandeis, quoted in Ford, The Int’l Jew, Vol.III., “Jewish 

Influences in American Life,”, Chp.LV, “B’nai B’rith Leader discusses the Jews, p. 172. 

“Nor is it surprising that a people which have since antiquity placed so high a value on 

the law should turn to many of its finer minds to the judiciary.” Kertzer, Today’s American 

Jew, Chp. 6, “Jews and Government,” p. 65. 

255 

BRANDEIS SUPPORTS THE “NEW DEAL.” Sachar, Course of Modern Jewish History, 

Chp. XVI, “Russian Jewry’s `Liberal’ Tradition in America — The Communist Crisis and the 

Triumph of the New Deal,” p. 334. 

256 

BRANDEIS’ METHODS OF “ACCUMULATION.” Sachar, id., 335. Let The Reader 

consider Brandeis; and then, consider: what would a Jew, placed so high and accessible to so 

much, do with all that “exhaustive accumulation” — when considering also the Jewish desire to 

regain control over a world that Jewry insanely believes belongs entirely to Jewry, to be 

retrieved by any means? (Ed.). 



Frankfurter exerted a major influence in the establishment of many of Roosevelt’s 

administrative agencies. Frankfurter also assured the appointment of “the large numbers of 

students and disciples he placed in government service,” all the while remaining active in Jewish 

and Zionist activities as far back as the early 1900’s. 257/ 

Massive numbers of college-trained sons of immigrant Jews poured into Washington 

during the “New Deal” years, 258/ finding jobs, as noted above, in “government civil service” 

because they were not welcome anywhere else, 259/ or because “they were raised on the pablum of 

social reform, and they shared the Brandeis and Frankfurter viewpoint.” Roosevelt wanted them 

because their devotion to the “New Deal” was unquestioned: “No Jew ever let me down,” he 

said. 260/ 

John Landis, a former Brandeis law clerk, drafted the “Securities Act,” and later was 

appointed chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 261/ Mordecai Ezekiel was 

placed in the Department of Agriculture as senior agricultural economist, 262/ and “intellectual 

257 

FRANKFURTER’S INFLUENCE. Sachar, id., p. 335-336. 

258 

JEWS POURED INTO WASHINGTON. “The new administration of Franklin Roosevelt 

had taken dramatic steps to end the crisis [of anti-semitism during the early years of 1930’s The 

Depression], actions devised and carried out, to a certain extent, by the first big influx of Jews 

into the federal government.” Volkman, Legacy of Hate, p. 36. 

259 

THEY WERE NOT WELCOME ANYWHERE ELSE. Prior to F.D. Roosevelt’s opening the 

doors wide for a Jewish takeover of the executive branch of the federal government, “[t]he 

bureaucracy of the American State Department [for example] was filled with men who had 

emerged from the country clubs and college fraternities which did not admit Jews. Its offices 

abroad were staffed with men who had grown up believing that Jews were a people apart from 

the normal strata of society. Scholars have found comments in records of the period [i.e., the mid 

to late 1930’s] like `Let Hitler have his way,’ America should not be `flooded’ with liberal 

professors, and on and on.” Baker, Days of Sorrow and Pain, Chp. 10, “Kristallnacht,” p. 222. 

Baker gives no sources for this allegation. (“A race apart.” see: Intro. to This Book, at note, 

EUGENICS THEORY; and, Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. III, “Jewish Influences in American Life, Chp. 

LV., “B’nai B’rith Leader Discusses the Jews,” p. 167). 

But, the Jews were then and now “a people apart,” by the Jews’ own choosing, as can be 

found when reading any Jewish book on Jewish life and conduct. In all nations in all history, 

there was and is an elite which controls the destiny of that nation; and when the Jews are allowed 

by the ignorant goyim to gain from them the powers they desire, the Jews, then, shall have their 

own “country clubs and college fraternities filled with men” who believe non-Jews are “a people 

apart” — as they do now. (Ed.). 

Another Jewish writer suggests the Jewish “performance coefficient” shows Jews were 

not distinguished in politics.” Kertzer, Today’s American Jew, Chp. 6, “Jews and Government,” 

p. 64. 

However, “politics” — as in “elections” to office — is not the same as the Communist 

tactic of “boring from within” by “appointment” to office. See: Nolan, Communism versus the 

Negro, Index. 

260 

PABLUM OF SOCIAL REFORM & FRIENDS. Sachar, id., p. 336. 

261 JOHN LANDIS. Sachar, id., p. 336. See also, Protocol No. 3.11; 21.3; 21.5, re: “exchange.” 

See also, Kertzer, id, p. 66. 

262 

MORDECAI EZEKIEL. Sachar, id; Isaacs, id., p. 63. This name seems almost too much. See 

also, Ford, Int’l Jew, Vol. IV, “Aspects of Jewish Power in the United States,” Chp. LXX, “The 



father of the controversial Agricultural Adjustment Act.” Isador Lubin, a Brookings Institute 

economist, was appointed commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics 263/ and chairman of the 

Labor Advisory Board in the Public Works administration, and later a member of the Roosevelt 

White House staff “special statistician,” in effect becoming Roosevelt’s economist. 264/ Judge 

Samuel Rosenman and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. — humorously called “Henry the Morgue” 265/ by 

Roosevelt — were said to be the two men closest to Roosevelt, with the exception of Louis 

Howe and Harry Hopkins. 266/ 

Rosenman arranged a “chance meeting” with Roosevelt years earlier, and followed 

Roosevelt in his political career as chief legal counselor and appointed as judge of the New York 

State Supreme Court (which, unlike most other States in the Union, it is the lowest level “court” 

in New York State, much like a municipal or superior court), and later a Roosevelt speechwriter 

— several of Roosevelt’s history-making addresses were written my him, 267/ and Rosenman was 

the “unofficial leader of the President’s `Brain Trust.’” 268/ Rosenman is credited with coining the 

phrase, “New Deal.” 269/ 

Morgenthau, Jr., served as Secretary of the Treasury 270/ in the Roosevelt Administration. 

He was one of the few Jews in that Administration that did not come from a Russian-Jewish 

background. (This lends weight to the assertion, more heavy now, that The Protocols are 

Russian-Jewish in origins). Morgenthau war responsible for bringing into the Treasury 

Department “experts” who restored public confidence (as though it were lacking?) in 

government securities and banking system. 271/ By the time Morgenthau and his “experts” were 

Gentle Art of Changing Jewish Names,” p. 109. 

263 LUBIN AT THE LABOR DEPARTMENT. Another Jewish account suggests Lubin “took 

over the Bureau...” Isaacs, p. 62. 

264 LUBIN AS FDR’S ECONOMIST. Isaacs, id., p. 63. 

265 MORGENTHAU, “THE MORGUE.” Isaacs, Jews and American Politics, Chp. V, 

“Avoiding bureaucracy: the non-government role,” p. 62. He was “somber, humorless.” Sachar, 

id., p. 337. 

266 LANDIS, EZEKIEL, LUBIN, ROSENMAN, MORGENTHAU, HOWE, HOPKINS. Sachar, 

Course of Modern Jewish History, chp. XVI, “Russian Jewry’s `Liberal’ Tradition in America 

— The Communist Crisis and the Triumph of the New Deal,” p. 336-337. 

267 ROOSEVELT’S HISTORY-MAKING ADDRESSES. Kertzer, Today’s American Jew, Chp. 

6, “Jews and Government,” p. 65. 

268 ROSENMAN, OF THE PRESIDENT’S “BRAIN TRUST.” Sachar, id., p. 337. 

269 ROSENMAN COINED THE “NEW DEAL.” Isaacs, id.,at p. 63. 

270 MORGENTHAU, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. “Franklin Roosevelt was careful to 

make Henry Morgenthau his Secretary of the Treasury.” Yaffe, id, p. 242. Why? (Ed.). 

271 MORGENTHAU’S EXPERTS” RESTORING CONFIDENCE. Sachar, id, at p. 337. It is not 

the “public”, i.e., the people-at-large, which lacked confidence in “the government”; it was those 

who held some debt-instrument (a security, bond, or note) which they,as “Creditor,” believed 

may not be paid. Hence, with a supposed “bankruptcy” of the “United States,” a bankruptcy 

“administration” of the “insecure” of the estate of the “Debtor-U.S.” would be established by the 

“Creditors” — whoever they may be; and Morgenthau was sent there (by who?) to secure the 

Creditors’ interests, not the public’s. That’s why. (Ed.). 



done with their “wide-sweeping changes” — i.e., liberalizing reforms, a common saying was 

that: “the financial capital had finally[?] moved from Wall Street to Washington.” 272/ 

After showing a plainly adverse history as chairman of many Jewish defense groups, 

David K. Niles, “a steward of liberal causes,” with a “treasured passion for anonymity,” was 

anointed by Roosevelt to be general assistant in charge of the labor advisor for the Works Project 

Administration (WPA), Harry Hopkins, chairmen; then as Special Assistant for Minority Affairs 

in the Roosevelt and Truman Administrations. 273/ Niles became what is now known as a White 

House “point man,” and handling minority affairs. 274/ 

Other Jewish appointees were: Ben Cohen, Jerome Frank, Robert Nathan, Anna 

Rosenberg, and “hundreds of other Jews at lower echelons of public service, were ardent 

exponents of the New Deal philosophy.” 275/ And why not? the “New Deal” was a deal-it-himself 

“Jewish Deal.” 

Bernard Baruch, “the eminent financier,” was not openly liberal in political attitude, but 

he was relied upon for his ability to obtain “industrial mobilization,” and highly valued by 

Presidents Wilson and F.D. Roosevelt. Other Jews in the Roosevelt Administration were: 

Admiral Louis Strauss, Judge Cyrus Sulzberger. 276/ 

Other “collaborators” were: Thomas G. (“Tommy”) Corcoran, 277/ Harold Ickes, and 

General (“Iron Pants”) Johnson. 278/ Corcoran was a “front man” for Benjamin V. Cohen, who 

was the “the intellectual genius behind many of the New Deal.’s legislative thrusts.” 279/ 

“Cohen, James McCauley Landis [mentioned above] and Corcoran — with regular 

telephone calls to Frankfurter in Cambridge — wrote the Securities Act of 1935 based on the 

idea that corporations were in fact public and therefore ought to be publicly regulated. The idea 

may have seemed somewhat radical in America, but it was not so radical according to precepts 

of Jewish communality [or, “commune-unity” — Ed.] and to the Talmudic recognition that 

`property is fundamentally a social object subject to social control.’” 280/ 

272 “FROM WALL STREET TO WASHINGTON.” Sachar, id., p. 337, providing no source. 

273 DAVID K. NILES. Sachar, id., p. 337. 

274 NILES, THE “POINT MAN.” Isaacs, Jews and American Politics, p. 62. What is the purpose 

of a “point man”? To perceive the situation and report back to a superior? or, more likely in this 

case, to assure that “superior’s” progress goes in a pre-determined direction? Who did Niles, et 

al., really work for? (Ed.). 

275 COHEN, FRANK, NATHAN, ROSENBERG, HUNDREDS OF OTHER JEWS. Sachar, id., 

p. 337 

276 BARUCH, STRAUSS, SULZBERGER. Sachar, id., p. 337. 

277 TOMMY CORCORAN. Corcoran was a “fellow Roosevelt aide” in 1935, with Benjamin 

Cohen. Isaacs, Jews and American Politics, Chp. III, “Room at the top: the role as staffer,” 

photo caption, facing p. 38. 

278 OTHER “COLLABORATORS.” Sachar, id., p. 336. Harold Ickes: [source, cites needed]. 

Johnson: [source, cites needed] 

279 COHEN, INTELLECTUAL GENIUS OF “NEW DEAL.” Isaacs, id., p. 62. 

280 PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO SOCIAL CONTROL. See: Isaacs, id., p. 62. See also, 

Talmud, p.__ 



“The team of Corcoran and Cohen that traipsed in and out of the White House became 

famous; tagged the `gold dust twins,’ they lived in a much-publicized `little red house’ on R 

Street in Georgetown. Corcoran was the suave and articulate front man, Cohen the withdrawn, 

bespectacled genius who would ponder late into the night considering how to fit what it was they 

were dong into the framework of the Constitution.” 281/ For reasons unknown now, these two men 

grafted into “the U.S. constitutional government” an “extra-constitutional government” (i.e., 

outside; not considered by the Constitution) means of ruling the people who by “assumpsit” 

were assumed to be “subject to that “Non-Government” and then made a privilege-process of 

guilty-until-proven-innocent. All this done, “while America slept” — or, was diverted by the 

hungers of The (Banker-caused) Depression. 

These two men commenced upon that “overhaul” of American law by taking on one 

project after another: the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; the Public Utility Holding Act of 

1935; the Federal Communications Act; the Tennessee Valley Authority; the Wagner Act; the 

Minimum Wage Act. 282/ 

Cohen, Frankfurter, Brandeis were but the top echelon. Other Jews joined the New Deal 

apparatus. To name only a few: Abe Fortas (later appointed to a Supreme Court Justice seat) 

was assigned to the new SEC; Charles Wyzanski, to the Labor Department; Joe Rauh, joined 

Niles, after serving as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Cardozo, then for Frankfurter; 

David Lilienthal; and Bernard Baruch reappeared as himself. 283/ 

The Jewish presence in the federal government was so detested that Roosevelt was called 

by some as “Rosen-velt,” and lists of Jews in his Administration, hundreds upon hundreds of 

Jewish names, were sent to Congressmen with the warning that the jews were about to execute 

their plan to seize the government. 284/ The silent invasion by Jews into the federal government 

— and state, county, and local, as well, was generally limited to the areas of most strategic 

importance: law, finance, economics, and social work. 285/ 

The Jews of foreign lands become “citizens,” yet knowing all the while they are not 

“Jewish Americans, but “American Jews.” Their allegiance is to Jewry, not to America. 

American citizenship os only a means to an end: the reign of the International-styled Jewry over 

all the world. Towards that end, these Jews direct their energies, as described above, in those 

281 CORCORAN & COHEN QUOTATIONS. Isaacs, id., Chp. V., “Avoiding bureaucracy: the 

non-government role,” p. 62. More correctly, they tried to see `how to fit what they were doing 

outside the Constitution,’ and they did it. (Ed.). 

282 ONE PROJECT AFTER ANOTHER. Isaacs, id., p. 62. 

283 FORTAS, WYZANSKI, RAUH, CARDOZO, LILIENTHAL, BARUCH. Isaacs, id., p. 63. 

284 LISTS OF JEWS PLANNING SEIZURE OF GOVERNMENT. Isaacs, p. 64. A “Freedom of 

Information Act Request” (FOIA; 5 U.S.C. §552) will not obtain those lists from the 

“Legislative Branch”; however, the “Executive Branch.” i.e., U.S. Attorney General, F.B.I., etc., 

would be required to “disclose” them to The Requestor. Be that Requestor, and prepare your 

“FOIA Appeal” and your “FOIA Lawsuit” as you wait. There are plenty of “samples; ask The 

Compiler & Editor of This Book. You may need help, but the “burden of proof” not-to-disclose 

is on The Government. (Ed.). 

285 JEWS IN LAW, ECONOMICS, AND SOCIAL WORK. Isaacs, id., p. 65. 



areas that are the most sensitive to the peoples of any nation: the areas of the most direct control 

— exerting as little effort to get maximum results. 

These International Jews, therefore, in executing their effort of “boring from within” 286/ 

as “citizens serving in their government,” make sure they find themselves involved in areas of 

“law,” because it was what controlled the conduct of a civilized people willing to resort to 

peaceful means of obtaining “justice”; 287/ and involved in “economics,” because it controlled the 

money and its supply to those civilized people, who relied upon monetary means, of coin and 

paper money having a set and agreed-upon value, as their exchange, rather than “barter” of labor, 

property, cattle, etc., which required more expertise in what-is-value; and involved in “social 

work,” because it took, by aggressive suggestion, the rights of individual, marriage, parents, 

family, etc., from them unaware, and silently transformed those personal/family “rights” as the 

same kind of “property” that was subject to social control,” 288/ where “The Government” has in 

all its actions innocence and “sovereign immunity” — sovereign over the people and immune 

from punitive actions in court, and the “Accused” citizen, though not a labeled or considered a 

criminal, is considered guilty until that accused convinces a “hard-minded” court that their 

Accusers are wrong — a difficult task, set that way by The Jews and Their Lies — just like the 

Talmud instructed, and just like Martin Luther said they would. 

================================================= 

S E C T I O N F O U R 

Section Four offers several commentaries of The Compiler & Editor of This Book, 

relevant to what The Reader has seen above, to more clearly define the situation. 

Part 1. 

JUDAISM AS AN INFLICTED MENTAL ILLNESS 

When 2% of all humans in any existence have a belief in their thought process that 98% 

of the other humans in that same existence are to be treated as sub-species at best and merely 

inanimate, material objects at worse, there is only one conclusion available: that 2% can only be 

considered as either insane or the concurrently the perpetrators and the victim(s) of their own 

self-inflicted mentally illness. 

This “illness” is a necessary result of Judaism, as it is written and as it is taught and as it 

is practiced, where the adherent of Judaism is intentionally drawn away from his or her normal, 

logical thought process — where there is a natural desire for giving and receiving kindness, and 

accomplishing good deeds, and no one is to be considered inferior to oneself — and that 

adherent is, from birth in most cases, mentally bent towards an unnatural theory entirely 

286 “BORING FROM WITHIN.” See, Nolan, Communism versus the Negro, Index. 

287 

“JUSTICE.” “Nor is it surprising that a people which have since antiquity placed so high a 

value on the law should turn to many of its finer minds to the judiciary.” Kertzer, Today’s 

American Jew, Chp. 6, “Jews and Government,” p. 65. 

288 

PROPERTY, INCLUDING PEOPLE, SUBJECT TO SOCIAL CONTROL. See: in accord, 

Isaacs, id., p. 62. 



unrealistic and incompatible to any other thought process imaginable — the idea that one 

individual is better than others; that the others, if not the same as the one, are animals, and that 

one can do with these other animal people as one desires, with out any accountability for “sin” or 

wrongdoing attaching to the perpetrator; that all inanimate, material property of the world — 

including those other individuals determined by the 23% to be the sub-species, et al. — belongs 

to oneself or ones “people;” and that these 2% own “in common” all these things; and further 

that one must use every means available obtain the “return” of that “property,” whether by slight, 

trickery, inducement, etc. 

Not intending to concern himself with the idea that Judaism could be considered an 

inflicted mental illness, Sigmund Freud wrote, “When a delusion cannot be dissipated by the 

facts of reality, it probably does not spring from reality.” 289/ 

It must also be considered an inflicted mental illness designed to encourage oneself 

and/or others to accomplish all manner of evil upon the non-self-styled others for the purpose of 

obtaining any success of that one’s “religion”; when a mere 2% of all the people on this earth 

believe the 98% of the others are incorrect and sub-human, deserving nothing oneself is believed 

entitled to; this surely is the infliction of one person upon another of a mentally unstable and 

unsound thought process; something that renders the recipient unable to cope with the normal 

situations of daily life. Judaism therefore, in all its ways, is a mental illness. It must be put out 

of theory, out of thought, out of practice. It must be studied only for the purpose of the spiritually 

strong being able to determine how one (older) group of people can and do twist the minds of 

their other (youthful) people, to cause them to become, and want to become, as twisted as their 

Elders. It is, therefore, our Christian duty to free those subjected to Judaism and punish, if 

needed, those who perpetuate this deranged thought process. ? 

If all those editions of The Protocols were read carefully, along with a careful reading of 

The Bible, the general situation regarding the increasing though subtle Jewish dominion over 

non-Jews would be non-existent; and Judaism, as an “inflicted mental illness,” would have been 

proved to be a fraud in and of itself, many centuries ago, with the practice of Judaism prohibited, 

having been — and must soon be — banned as illegal, and instruction of Judaism for the 

purposes of such practice would have been — and must soon be — declared as “inhumane” and 

a violation of individual and societal “human rights,” with the ecclesiastical and secular 

enforcement of those proscriptive, i.e., prohibitive, laws. 

289 DISSIPATED BY THE FACTS OF REALITY. Wolkman, A Legacy of Hate at p. 33. 



Part. 2. 

AN UNFINISHED 

COMMENTARY UPON 

“THE TRADITIONS OF THE ELDERS,” 

MORE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD 

by Ronald J. Gardner 290/ 

The “Traditions of the Elders,” as plentifully mentioned in The Holy Scriptures as well as 

in the famous (or infamous) The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, has the ever lasting 

Condemnatory Judgements upon them, as spoken by The Master and Teacher of the true 

Christianity, Jesus Christ upon such “Traditions” which put forth the limited wisdom of certain 

religious men as superior to the Eternal Wisdom of Almighty God in the Old Testament. The 

words of Jesus are found in The Gospel According to Matthew, Chp. 15, verses :2, :3, and :6; 

and, in The Gospel According to Mark, Chp. 7, verses :3, :5 :8, :9, and :13. 

Regardless of this sound rejection of these “Traditions,” there was shortly thereafter the 

re-institution of those same “Traditions” which Jesus justly condemned, as found in the New 

Testament Epistles (or, the Writings) of “Paul,” known formerly as “Saul of Tarsus.” Saul/Paul 

was a self-admitted Representative of The Jewish religious sect known as The Pharisees, 

confessing himself to be a rabbinical Jew and Voluntary Persecutor of the (yet to so-named 

followers of Jesus) the “Christians.” (See: Galatians Chp. 1:13-14; compare with Acts 7:58 and 

following). 

The “Traditions of the Elders,” as plentifully mentioned in The Holy Scriptures as well as 

in the famous (or infamous) The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, has the ever lasting 

Condemnatory Judgements upon them, as spoken by The Master and Teacher of the true 

Christianity, Jesus Christ upon such “Traditions” which put forth the limited wisdom of certain 

religious men as superior to the Eternal Wisdom of Almighty God in the Old Testament. The 

words of Jesus of Nazareth are found in The Gospel According to Matthew, Chp. 15, verses :2, 

:3, and :6; and, in The Gospel According to Mark, Chp. 7, verses :3, :5 :8, :9, and :13. 

Part 3. 

HOW “St. PAUL” — BEING A JEW, 

OR AT LEAST A JEWISH TOOL — 

DECEIVED ANCIENT CHRISTIANITY. 

(This Part has been improved upon so greatly in another Work that it cannot be fitted 

easily into this Book nor its Part(s). It is sure to irritate greatly those Christians who fail to 

discern The Word from the word). 

Let it never be forgotten that Saul/Paul was throughout that time willfully charged by the 

Jewish Pharisees with the destruction of the followers of Jesus Christ and the new Christian 

290 AFORE-MENTIONED COPY RIGHTS ATTACH HERETO. This short article is protected 

by the copyright indicated at the beginning of This Book. (Ed.). Honor The Author. 



faith. To accomplish those ends, Saul/Paul discovered he was unable to overwhelm this 

Christian idea nor gain the return of those followers into Judaism, despite his confessed violent 

means. 

Recognizing the old adages of “If you can’t beat them, join them,” and “If you cannot 

convince them, confuse them,” Saul/Paul rather suddenly and conveniently becomes a “convert” 

to the Teachings of Jesus Christ; he purports to have engaged in an unwitnessed communication 

with the Spirit of Jesus Christ; he alleges healings of the sick done in the name of Jesus Christ, 

etc. And, with the zeal of the recently converted, thereafter Saul/Paul waxes boldly and speaks 

to the followers of Jesus Christ, imploring them to do-this and not-do-that. 

However, true to his duties, Saul/Paul lends confusion to the matter by applying the vain 

usage of the name of his creation of “our Lord Jesus Christ” to compel by his aggressive 

suggestion the creation of a new religion, using subtle infusions of the “Traditions of the Elders” 

of Judaism into the then-existing, successful, healing and reforming Christianity. These 

corrupting mixtures of contradiction resulted in what in the modern-day parlance is titled the 

“Judeo-Christian” faith — the opposite of the true Christianity. 

This destruction of the true Christianity — as it was mastered, taught, and demonstrated 

by Jesus Christ — was accomplished by Saul/Paul’s Jewish principles which permit the Jew to 

misinform, misdirect, and otherwise frustrate and even kill if necessary anyone who opposes the 

Judaism, whether mere, and expendable goyim, or apostate Jew, or otherwise. Saul/Paul’s 

careful use of `protection-talk’ style (i.e., `Well, some people may argue with this, but you 

should...’ or, `This may sound too good to be true, but I believe...’). The Reader can see this 

method in Colossians 2:8 (Saul/Paul’s alleged desire not to “spoil you...after the tradition of 

men”) and, in Galatians 1:14 (Saul/Paul’s regretting his being “exceedingly zealous of the 

traditions of my fathers”). 

Then, having misdirected the ordinary caution that a Christian should have for the Jews 

and Their Lies (See, Martin Luther’s lengthy treatise of A.D. 1546, under that same title 291/ ), 

Saul/ Paul then, by commands these Christian followers anew, and thereby drawing astray the 

new Christian faith and Its followers, as seen, here for a limited example, in 2nd Thessalonians 

3:6 (one should avoid any man “not after the traditions which he has not received of us”); then, 

in 2nd Thessalonians 2:15 (“stand fast and hold the traditions which ye have been taught”). 

291 MARTIN LUTHER’S WORKS. It should be noted that the Works of Martin Luther, the 

instigator of The (now essentially dissipated) Protestant Reformation Movement, wrote certain 

treatises, or “essays,” regarding Jewry and their adverse impact upon Christianity, under such 

titles as Dr. Martin Luther’s Warning to His Dear German People (A.D. 1531); Against the 

Sabbaterians: Letter To A Good Friend (A.D. 1538); and, On The Jews And Their Lies (A.D. 

1543), among several others. German leaders of the mid-1500’s cited Luther’s treatises as 

having “alerted him to the Jews’ nefarious designs” and withdrew the `right of safe-conduct’ of 

Jews; these essays of Luther were suppressed until 1930-1940, when the National Socialists 

permitted their publication; these essays lend great weight to the principles described in this 

edition and version of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. See also, Luther’s Works, 

Vol. 47, “The Christian in Society.” (Ed.). 



In that manner, Saul/Paul provides contradictory statements that will of necessity confuse 

the Listener or the Reader of those words into a misunderstanding of a supposed intent, and 

rendering the less thoughtful Listener or Reader into following the strongest voice that would 

attempt to “explain” such contrary and unconnectable thoughts and writings — which Saul/Paul 

has accomplished to this very day, to the delight of the Pharisees of Old and New. 

Therefore, at this subtle hidden hand of Judaism through Saul/ Paul, there has not been 

practiced the true Christianity as mastered, taught, and demonstrated by Jesus Christ, for almost 

the last two thousand years. 

For reference to the “Traditions of the Elders,” See: the ever-lasting Condemnatory 

Judgements by The Master and Teacher of the true Christianity, Jesus Christ upon such 

“Traditions,” in The Gospel According to Matthew, Chp. 15, verses :2, :3, and :6; and, in The 

Gospel According to Mark, Chp. 7, verses :3, :5 :8, :9, and :13. See also, the Commentary on 

“The Traditions of the Elders, Understood,” in the to this Booklet. 

A CLOSING NOTE TO SECTION 4., PART 3. 

When some one doubts, or asks questions, about a serious subject such as the Writings of 

Paul and their more correct interpretations, it does not mean that The Doubter or Questioner is 

becoming an apostate — i.e., turning from the faith. Rather, it means that he or she is now 

awakened to what they had not thought of until that moment. If a “pastor” or “priest” responds 

to The Doubter’s questions with scriptural “cant & law, with biblical points & authorities in 

support,” The Doubter will be convinced of the truth of the matter, and shown his or her errors. 

But if that pastoral response is the usual haughty threats or subtle warnings to “conformance or 

excommunication,” that Doubter has just struck a chord of dis-harmony — not in themselves, 

but in “The Church, The System,” which the pastor or priest can not — or will not — resolve, 

knowing, perhaps, “The Truth.” 

Biblical Scripture is “harmony.” The end result of Scripture-study is that. But to obtain 

that harmony, much dis-harmony is revealed in the “acts of men,” to instruct the awakened 

spiritual-musician on the how-to’s of obtaining that harmony, and avoiding the easily-followed 

propositions of self-appointed spiritual leaders of dis-harmony, such as “St. Paul.” 

Therefore, a more careful — and “doubting” — reading of the “New Testament” 

Writings of Paul, formerly Saul of Tarsus, based upon the above treatises, will perhaps enlighten 

The Reader as to just how far “off-point” modernized Christianity had become, and what The 

Reader can do about it will be plainly seen, just by the commencement of awakening others as to 

this dark and unspoken danger. 

It should be noted that the Works of Martin Luther, the instigator of The Protestant 

Reformation Movement, wrote certain treatises, or “essays,” regarding Jewry and their adverse 

impact upon Christianity, under such titles as Dr. Martin Luther’s Warning to His Dear German 

People (A.D. 1531); Against the Sabbaterians: Letter To A Good Friend (A.D. 1538); and, On 

The Jews And Their Lies (A.D. 1543), among several others. German leaders of the mid-1500’s 



cited Luther’s treatises as having “alerted him to the Jews’ nefarious designs” 292/ and withdrew 

the `right of safe-conduct’ of Jews; 293/ these essays of Luther were suppressed until 1930-1940, 

when the National Socialists permitted their publication; these essays lend great weight to the 

principles described in The Protocols. 

Part 4. 

From: Don Juan 

Canto 12, V and VI 

by George Gordon Byron* 

(1788-1824, 6th Baron Lord Byron) 

Who hold the balance of the world? Who reign 

O’er congress, whether royalist or liberal? 

Who rouse the shirtless patriots of Spain? 

(That make old Europe’s journals squeak and gibber[1] all) 

Who keep the world, both old and new, in pain 

Or pleasure? Who make politics run glibber[2] all? 

The Shade of Buonaparte’s noble daring? 

Jew Rothschild,[3] and his fellow-Christian, Baring.[4] 

Those, and the truly liberal Lafitte,[5] 

Are the true lords of Europe. Every loan 

Is not a merely speculative hit, 

But seats a nation or upsets a throne. 

Republics also get involved a bit; 

Columbia’s[6] stock hath holders not unknown 

On ‘Change,[7] and even thy silver soil, Peru,[8] 

Must get itself discounted by a Jew. 

See also, this same quotation in: Armament and History, Major Gen. J.F.C. Fuller, C.B., C.B.E., 

D.S.O. (New York, Chs. Scribners’ Sons, 1945), Chp. V., “Age of Steam,” p. 123. 

NOTES: 

* George Gordon Byron (Lord Byron), English poet. (Webst.Int’l.Dict. (WID), 2nd Ed., 

WID, Bio, p. 3140); 

[1] Gibber: to speak rapidly and inarticulatively, or foolishly; p. 1055 

292 ALERTED TO JEWS’ NEFARIOUS DESIGNS. See: Luther’s Works, Vol. 47, “Christians 

in Society,” Part IV. Frank Sherman, Ed. (Fortress Press, Phila., 1971). 

293 “SAFE-CONDUCT OF JEWS.” The Jews were prohibited by law from freely travelling 

within and through most all European nations, for the fear that the Jews would perpetuate their 

obstructionist and destructive activities against Christian-based authority. Therefore under the 

guise of religious communication, the Jews would obtain from the Christian governments an 

òccasional use’ travel permit, issued under governmental authority, for safe — and 

unfortunately, unobstructed — travel. This unintentional Christian error essentially guaranteed 

the Jew travellers their “right” to coincidently spread anti-Christian dissension as they went — 

and they did. (Ed.). 



[2] Glibber: slippery. p. 1064 (or, gibber, as in note 1, above?). 

[3] Rothschild: Meyer Amschel R~, (1743-1812), German Jew banker, founder of 

House of R~ banking. (WID, Bio, p. 3182). 

[4] Baring: Sir Francis B~ (1740-1810), English capitalist and banker (WID, Bio., p. 3134). 

See also, re: banking-house competitors of Rothschild Brothers and others: Baring Bros., 

“fashionable English bankers” (still in business today, i.e., Lord Cromer) and, Ouvrand. Tragedy 

and Hope, Carroll Quigley (N.Y. Macmillian 1966), pp. 52, 56, 500); (The Rothschilds, A 

Family Portrait, Frederic Morton (N.Y. Curtis Pub., 1962), p. 52-55). 

[5] Lafitte: Jacques L~ (1767-1844) French banker and politician. (WID, Bio, p. 3165). 

[6] Columbia: Perhaps reference is to the “District of Columbia” of the United States of 

America, or to the South American nation, Columbia; what “stock”, is unknown. (Ed.). 

[7] Or, the (Stock or Commodities) “Exchange”? (Ed.). 

[8] Peru: Some of the worlds richest mineral deposits are found in the Peruvian mountains. 

World Book Encycl. Vol. 15, p. 272. 



A BIBLIOGRAPHY 

AN UN-ORGANIZED and INCOMPLETE 

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SOURCES 

RELLIED UPON WHEN ASSEMBLING 

INFORMATION REGARDING THIS BOOK 

American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Year Book, Schiderman & Morris, Eds., (Phila., 

The Jewish Publication Society of America, [Annual]) 

Leonard Baker, Days of Sorrow and Pain: Leo Baeck and The Berlin Jews, London, Macmillian 

Pub. Co., 1978 

Nathan C. Belth, A Promise to Keep: A Narrative of the American Encounter with Anti-Semitism 

(New York, Time Books, 1979) 

Harry Bennett, We Never Called Him Henry, New York, Faucett Books, 1951 

Philip Blackman, F.C.S., Mishnayoth: Pointed Bebrew Translation, Talmud Grammar, Maps, 

Ruminat Stomach, Taryag Mitzvoth, Hadran, Foreign Words, Faunam Flora, Indexes, 2nd Ed., 

Corrigenda, Addenda, Notes, New York, The Judaica Press, 1964, in 7 Vols. 

Cassell’s French-English, English-French Dictionary, New York, Macmillan Pub Co., 1978 

Margaret Coit, Mr. Baruch, The man, the myth, the eighty years, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co. 

1957 

Bertrand Comparet, Your Heritage, San Diego, Calif., Your Heritage Pub., c. 1960s 

Milton William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, Light Technology Pub. Sedona, Ariz., 1991 

Lucy S. Davidowicz, The War Against the Jews: 1933-1945, New York, Bantam, 1975 

Max I. Dimont, Jews, God, and History, New York, Signet/Times Mirror, 1962 

Max I. Dimont, The Indestyructible Jews, New York, Signet, 1971 

Paul Finley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions confront Israwel’s Lobby, 

Chicago, Lawrence Hill Books, 1985, 1989 

HENRY FORD. 

Henry Ford Sr. The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem; available 

from: Liberty Bell Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 25270; “Part/Item No.” 

09004, 1994 

MY LIFE AND WORK, 

Today and Tomorrow (19 — ) 

Moving Forward (19 — ). 



Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, London, Hurst & Blackett, Ltd., 1942, James Murphy, Translator 

Richard J.H. Gotthiel, Zionism (Movements in Judaism), Phila., The Jewish Publication Society 

of America, 1914 

Hertsberg, Arthur, ed., Judaism: the Unity of the Jewish Spirit throught the Ages, New York, 

Geo. Braziller, 1962 

Isaacs, Jews in American Politics, New York, Doubleday & Cp., 1974 

Keller, Mr. Ford, What Have You Done?, Henry Ford’s Views on Economics, Self-published, 

Qubin, Missouri, 1993 

Kertzer, Today’s American Jew, New York, MaGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967 

Klatt & Golze, Langenscheidt’s German-English Dict., New York, Washington Sq. Press, 1929, 

1952) 

Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament, Talbott, Transl./Ed., Boston, Little, Brown & Co. 

1974 

Albert Lee, Henry Ford and the Jews, (Pub.Co, City, Year) 

Lenin, I.V., “Left-wing” Communism, An Infantile Disorder, Peking, foreign Languages Press, 

1965 

Levy, A Lie & A Libel, 

Bernard Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, New York, W.W. Norton, 1986 

Liberty Lobby, Conspiracy Against Liberty, 

Martin Luther, The Jews & Their Lies (1534 A.D.); Liberty Bell Pub., “Part/Item No.” 10013, 

1994 

Nolan, Communism versus the Negro, Institute of Social Order, St. Luis University (Henry 

Regenery Co., 1951 

Richard L. Perry, Sources of Our Liberties, American Bar Foundation, 1155 East 66th Street, 

chicago, Illinois, 1978 

Raymond Postgate, Story of a Year: 1848, Jonathan Cape, Thirty Bedford Square, London, 1955 

Howard Sachar, The Course of Modern Jewish History, World Pub. Co., N.Y., 1958 

Sherman, Franklin, Luther’s Works, Vol. 47, “The Christian in Society,” Phila, Fortress Press, 

1971 



Gerald L.K. Smith, author: 

Matters of Life and Death, Los Angeles, Christian Nationalist Crusade, c. 1958; 

The International Jew, L.A., Christ. Nat’l. Crusade, c. 1941. 

Norman A. Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands in Modern Times, New York, The Jewish 

Publication Society, 5751-1991 

Chaim Potok, Wanderings: History of the Jews, New York, Alfred A. Knopf, Pub. 1987 

Tragedy and Hope, Carroll Quigley, N.Y. Macmillian 1966 

Robert. C. Tucker, ed, The Marx-Engels Reader, New York, W.W. Norton, 1972 

Ernest Wolkman, A Legacy of Hate: Anti-Semitism in America, New York, Franklin Watts, Pub., 

1982 

Winrod, Gerald B. Winrod (Ed., The Defender), The Truth About The Protocols, Liberty Bell 

Pub., Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 25270 

James Yaffe, The American Jews, Portrait of a Split Personality, New York, Random House, 

1968 

What Mrs. [Mary Baker] Eddy Said to Arthur Brisbane: the Celebrated Interview of the Eminent 

Journalist with the Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science, Boston, M.E. Paige Pub., 1930 

SCRIPTURAL REFERENCES (Incomplete) 

The Gospel According to Matthew 

The Gospel According to Mark 

The Gospel According to Luke 

The Gospel According to John 

REFERENCE WORKS (here, occasionally sans bibliographical detail): 

The Dearborn Independent, The Dearborn Publishing Co., Dearborn, Michigan, 1920-1922. 

The International Jew, Liberty Bell Pub., P.O. Box 21, Reedy, West Virginia 25270 

World Book Encyclopedia, Chicago, Field Enterprises Educational Corporation, 1973. 

Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition Unabridged, G. & C. Marriam Co., 

Springfield, Mass., 1960 (this edition was said by many librarians and lexicons to this 

Compiler/Editor as the most reliable); 

Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, West Pub. Co St. Paul, Minn. 1968 

Jonathan Elliot,(Ed.), Debates of the several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Fedral 

Constitution in 1787, Phila., J.B. Lippencott & Co., 1836, 2nd ed., Law Publisher’s Reprint, 

1941. 



Max Farrand, Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, New Haven, Yale Univ. Press, 19__. 

(There are at least five different editions of Farrand. Ed.). 

Standard Jewish Encycl., 

The New Dictionary of Thoughts, A Cyclopedia of Quotations (Being a Digest of Striking 

Thoughts from the Master Minds of the World Begun Over Ninety Years Ago and covering a 

Period of Over Four Thousand Years), Tryon Edwards, D.D., ed., New York, Standard Book 

Company, MCMXXXVI, 1955 

Dictionary of Quotations, Bergen Evans, ed., New York, Avenel Books, MCMLXVIII. 

The New Jewish Encyclopedia 

Encyclopedia Judaica 

The Jewish Guardian, 

The Jewish Chronicle 

True Magazine 

============================================== 

The End of Book One — The Introduction to 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 

More Clearly Understood 

The Reader may be interested in completing this study 

by consulting Book Two, The Annotated Text, 

for further details and useful information.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?